Cited by 109Mental Health Treatment and AccessHealth disparities and outcomesRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

Is the Black-White Mental Health Paradox Consistent Across Gender and Psychiatric Disorders?

Open access
Erving, Christy L, Thomas, Courtney S, Frazier, Cleothia·2019·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

This study assessed whether the black-white mental health epidemiologic paradox (i.e., blacks' lower or similar rates of mental disorder relative to whites) extends across 12 lifetime and past-year psychiatric disorders and whether it varies with gender. We used data from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication and the National Survey of American Life, 2001-2003 (n = 4,584 black and 6,668 non-Hispanic white persons). Results showed overwhelming evidence of the paradox across lifetime and past-year disorders for women and men. In addition, blacks' mental health advantage over whites widened after adjusting for socioeconomic factors. There was one exception: Black women experienced higher risk of lifetime posttraumatic stress disorder compared with white women. These findings provide strong evidence for the "black-white mental health paradox"; however, additional research is needed to understand black women's heightened risk for posttraumatic stress disorder.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kwy224

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Erving, C. L., Thomas, C. S., & Frazier, C.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Erving, Christy L
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2018-10-24
Volume
188
Issue
2
Pages
314-322
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2898423841
Cited by
109
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2
FWCI
9.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (P30-AG021684, UL1TR001881)
  • National Institution on Aging (P30-AG021684)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR001881)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P2C – HD041022)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
racial disparities in mental health, mental illness, gender differences, post-traumatic stress disorder, Black women, socioeconomic factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Black or African American, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, United States, Comorbidity, Prevalence, White People, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review