Cited by 35Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsMental Health Treatment and Access

Detection and management of alcohol use disorders in German primary care influenced by non-clinical factors

Berner, M. M., Harter, M., Kriston, L., Lohmann, M., Ruf, D., Lorenz, G., Mundle, G.·2007·Alcohol and Alcoholism

Abstract

AIMS: The primary objective was to assess the proportion of detected and correctly referred patients in German primary care. The secondary objective was to identify patient and practitioner characteristics that predict detection and correct referral. METHODS: In this clustered cross-sectional survey in German primary care, 3003 patients were consecutively invited to participate, and were asked to fill in a standardized health questionnaire. They were then screened for problematic alcohol consumption using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. The physicians recorded their assessment of the presence of any alcohol use disorder and documented the treatment course of all identified patients for 3 months. RESULTS: Correctly identified problem drinkers were 38.6% in a per-protocol analysis and 33.6% using a worst-case scenario. Referral behaviour of physicians was in conformity with current practice guidelines in 64.6% of the documented cases and 27.0% in a worst-case scenario. Several patient (e.g. sex, age) and practitioner characteristics (e.g. age), which influence the diagnosis and referral of patients, could be identified. CONCLUSIONS: There is a clear need to increase the special diagnostic and therapeutic skills of general practitioners so that they may be able to indicate and perform secondary prevention. Further research should focus on the likely effects of the implementation of these diagnostic and management tools.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/alcalc/agm013

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Six pieces of data from 3 qualitative, 1 quantitative and 1 mixed methods studies alluded that both GPs' and nurses' screening activities were influenced by patients' characteristics.

    “Six pieces of data from 3 qualitative, 1 quantitative and 1 mixed methods studies alluded that both GPs and nurses screening activities were influenced by patients’ characteristics [41, 51, 74, 105, 115].”

    From Factors influencing the implementation of screening and brief interventions for alcohol use in primary care practices: a systematic review using the COM-B system and Theoretical Domains Framework (2021) · cites this paper as [51]

    The Detection and referral of patients section (p. 5) reports that patient characteristics, including sex and frequency of GP visits, were associated with GPs’ detection of problem drinkers. This supports the GP portion of the claim, but the paper does not study nurses’ screening activities; its measured outcome is GP detection rather than screening activity generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Berner, M. M., Habbig, S. and H¨ arter, M. (2004) Quality of guidelines for the treatment of alcohol related disorders. A systematic review and content analysis. [German]. Fortschritte der Neurologie and Psychiatrie 72 , 696-704.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berner, M. M., Harter, M., Kriston, L., Lohmann, M., Ruf, D., Lorenz, G., & Mundle, G.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Freiburg (DE)
  • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Berner, M. M.
Venue
Alcohol and Alcoholism
Published
2007-05-21
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
308-316
ISSN
  • 0735-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3502
OpenAlex
W1979576672
Cited by
35
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Alcohol and Alcoholism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
alcoholism, primary care, alcohol screening, referral behavior, general practitioners, auditing, secondary prevention, diagnostic accuracy, clinical guidelines, patient characteristics, physician characteristics
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcoholism, Analysis of Variance, Female, Germany, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Quality Control, Referral and Consultation, Socioeconomic Factors, Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review