Cited by 285Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHealth Policy Implementation ScienceAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Screening and brief intervention for excessive alcohol use: qualitative interview study of the experiences of general practitioners

Open access
Beich, A.·2002·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the suitability of a screening based intervention for excessive alcohol use by describing the experiences of general practitioners who tried such an intervention in their everyday practice. DESIGN: Qualitative interviews with general practitioners who had participated in a pragmatic study of a combined programme of screening and a brief intervention for excessive alcohol use. Doctors were interviewed either individually or in focus groups. A computer based, descriptive, phenomenological method was used to directly analyse the digitally recorded interviews. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 24 of 39 general practitioners in four Danish counties who volunteered to take part in the pragmatic study were interviewed. RESULTS: The doctors were surprised at how difficult it was to establish rapport with the patients who had a positive result on the screening and to ensure compliance with the intervention. Although the doctors considered the doctor-patient relationship robust enough to sustain targeting of alcohol use, they often failed to follow up on initial interventions, and some expressed a lack of confidence in their ability to counsel patients effectively on lifestyle issues. The doctors questioned the rationale of screening in young drinkers who may grow out of excessive drinking behaviour. The programme needed considerable resources, and it interrupted the natural course of consultations and was inflexible. The doctors could not recommend the screening and brief intervention programme, although they thought it important to counsel their patients on drinking. CONCLUSIONS: Screening for excessive alcohol use created more problems than it solved for the participating doctors. The results underline the value of carrying out pragmatic studies on the suitability of seemingly efficacious healthcare programmes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.325.7369.870

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Saunders JB, Aasland OG. WHO collaborative study on identification and treatment of persons with harmful alcohol consumption. Report on phase 1: developement of a screening instrument. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1987.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beich, A.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Beich, A.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2002-10-19
Volume
325
Issue
7369
Pages
870-870
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2117405519
Cited by
285
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 26
FWCI
11.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
screening and brief intervention, excessive alcohol use, general practitioners, physician experience, physician-patient relationship, patient rapport, intervention adherence, follow-up, lifestyle counseling
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcoholism, Denmark, Family Practice, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Physician-Patient Relations, Psychotherapy, Brief

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review