Cited by 165Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentLung Cancer Research Studies

Maintenance bevacizumab-pemetrexed after first-line cisplatin-pemetrexed-bevacizumab for advanced nonsquamous nonsmall-cell lung cancer: updated survival analysis of the AVAPERL (MO22089) randomized phase III trial

Open access
Barlesi, F., Scherpereel, A., Gorbunova, V., Gervais, R., Vikström, A., Chouaid, C., Chella, A., Kim, J.H. +9 more·2014·Annals of Oncology

Abstract

Background The randomized, phase III AVAPERL trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab maintenance with or without pemetrexed in nonsquamous nonsmall-cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC). Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly prolonged with bevacizumab-pemetrexed, but overall survival (OS) data were immature. In this article, we report an independent, updated analysis of survival outcomes in AVAPERL.Patients and methods Patients with advanced nsNSCLC received first-line bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg), cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)), and pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks (q3w) for four cycles. Nonprogressing patients were randomized to maintenance bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg) or bevacizumab-pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)) q3w until progression or consent withdrawal. The primary end point of the trial was PFS; in this independent OS analysis, participating study centers were contacted to collect survival data on patients still alive at the time of the first analysis.Results A total of 376 patients received induction treatment. Disease control was confirmed in 71.9% of patients; 253 patients were randomized to maintenance treatment with bevacizumab (n = 125) or bevacizumab-pemetrexed (n = 128). At a median follow-up of 14.8 months, patients allocated to bevacizumab-pemetrexed had significantly improved PFS versus those on bevacizumab when measured from randomization [7.4 versus 3.7 months, hazard ratio (HR), 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.75); P < 0.0001]. OS events occurred in 58% of all patients. OS was numerically longer with bevacizumab-pemetrexed versus bevacizumab when measured from randomization [17.1 versus 13.2 months, HR 0.87 (0.63-1.21); P = 0.29]. Second-line therapy was administered in 77% and 70% of patients in the bevacizumab and bevacizumab-pemetrexed arms, respectively. No new adverse events were reported during this updated analysis.Conclusion In an unselected population of nsNSCLC patients achieving disease control on platinum-based induction therapy, maintenance with bevacizumab-pemetrexed was associated with a nonsignificant increase in OS over bevacizumab alone.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/annonc/mdu098

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Walsh TN, Noonan N, Hollywood D et al. A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 462-467.
  2. Safran H, Suntharalingam M, Dipetrillo T et al. Cetuximab with concurrent chemoradiation for esophagogastric cancer: assessment of toxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 70: 391-395.
  3. Blackstock AW, Aklilu M, Lovato J et al. Pathologic complete response may not represent the optimal surrogate for survival after preoperative therapy for esophageal cancer. Int J Gastrointest Cancer 2006; 37: 7-14.
  4. Jones DR, Detterbeck FC, Egan TM et al. Induction chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy in patients with carcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64: 185-191. discussion 191. -192.
  5. Rohatgi PR, Swisher SG, Correa AM et al. Failure patterns correlate with the proportion of residual carcinoma after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for carcinoma of the esophagus. Cancer 2005; 104: 1349-1355.
  6. Kleinberg LR, Catalano PJ, Gibson MK. ECOG 2205: A phase II study to measure response rate and toxicity of neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (IMRT permitted) with oxaliplatin (O) and infusional 5-fluorouracil (5FU) plus cetuximab (C225) in patients with operable adenocarcinoma of the esophagus: high risk of post-op adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 78: S72.
  7. We acknowledge Maria Luz Amador, Beatrix Lutiger, and Stefanie Srock, (F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.) for their critical input on this manuscript. In addition, we thank Andrea Schulze (Parexel International, Berlin) for her contributions to the statis- tical analysis, and we acknowledge the contributions of the AVAPERL study investigators. France: Eric Pichon (Hôpital Bretonneau, Tours), Denis Moro-Sibilot (Hôpital Albert Michallon, Grenoble [La Tronche]), Lidia Petit (Hôpital Robert Debre, Reims), Michael Hummelsberger (Centre De Radiothérapie Onco Médicale, Beziers), Gael Deplanque, (Gh Paris Saint Joseph, Paris), Maurice Perol (Hôpital De La Croix Rousse, Lyon), Roland Schott (Centre Paul Strauss, Strassbourg), Radj Gervais (Centre Françoise Baclesse, Caen), Pierre-Jean Souquet (Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Pierre Bénite), Francoise Guichard (Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine, Bordeaux), Pierre Fournel (Hôpital Nord, Saint-Etienne), Pascal Thomas (CHI des Alpes du Sud Site de Gap, Gap), Jean Domas (Hôpital Saint Jean, Perpignan), Henri Janicot (Hôpital Gabriel Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand), Dominique Genet (Clinique Chenieux, Limoges), Gerard Zalcman (Hôpital Cote De Nacre, Caen), Henri Berard (HIA Sainte Anne, Toulon), Isabelle Monnet (Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal, Creteil), Bénédicte Etiene- Mastroianni (Hôpital Louis Pradel, Bron), Lionel Falchero (Hôpital Nord Ouest, Gleize), Bernard Milleron (Hôpital Tenon, Paris), Christos Chouaid (Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris); Germany: Frank Griesinger (Pius-Hospital, Oldenburg), Hubert Wirtz (Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig), Yon-dschun Ko (Johanniter-Krankenhaus, Bonn), Corinna Eschbach (Asklepios Klinik Harburg, Hamburg), Elke Jaeger (Nordwest Klinik F., Frankfurt), Claus Steppert (Bezirksklinikum Obermain, Ebensfeld), Martin Reck (Krankenhaus Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf), Rudolf Huber (Ludwig-Maximilians Uni Klinik Innenstadt, Leipzig), Parvis Sadjadian (Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden, Minden), Christian Grohé (Evang. Lungenklinik Berlin, Berlin), Bernhard Heinrich (Haematologisch-Onkologische Praxis; Dr Med Brudler, Heinrich, Bangerter, Muenchen), Joerg Mezger (St Vincentius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein), B.E.E.M. Van den Borne (Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven), J.C.C.M. in 't Veen (Sint Franciscus Gasthuis, Rotterdam), J.A. Burgers (Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis, Amsterdam), F.P.J. Peters (Orbis Medisch Centrum, Sittard), Marten De Vries (Zaans Medisch Centrum, Zaandam); Russian Federation: Sergey Orlov (Research Institute of Pulmo- nology, St Petersburg), Rimma Savkova (Moscow Regional Oncology Hospital, Balashikha), Viktoriay Dvornichenko (Regi- onal Oncology Hospital, Irkutsk), Igor Polyakov (Clinical Regional Hospital #4, Krasnodar); Spain: Pilar Garrido Lopez (Hospital Ramon Y Cajal, Madrid), Juana Oramas (Hospital Univ.
  8. Patel J, Socinski MA, Garon EB et al. A randomized, open-label, phase 3, superiority study of pemetrexed (Pem)+carboplatin (Cb)+bevacizumab (B) followed by maintenance Pem+B versus paclitaxel (Pac)+Cb+B followed by maintenance B in patients ( pts) with stage IIIB or IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC). J Thorac Oncol 2012; 7: S336 (Abstr LBPL1).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barlesi, F., Scherpereel, A., Gorbunova, V., Gervais, R., Vikström, A., Chouaid, C., Chella, A., Kim, J. H., Ahn, M. J., Reck, M., Pazzola, A., Kim, H. T., Aerts, J. G., Morando, C., Loundou, A., Groen, H. J. M., & Rittmeyer, A.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR)
  • Centre François Baclesse (FR)
  • Linköping University Hospital (SE)
  • Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
  • University of Pisa (IT)
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Samsung Medical Center (KR)
  • LungenClinic Grosshansdorf (DE)
  • National Cancer Center (KR)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille (FR)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
1044-1052
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128002599
Cited by
165
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 9
FWCI
19.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd (NCT00961415)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
Keywords
bevacizumab, pemetrexed, maintenance therapy, cisplatin, first-line chemotherapy, overall survival, progression-free survival, anti-VEGF therapy, second-line therapy, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, EGFR mutation status, predictive biomarkers, quality of life, patient-reported outcomes
MeSH terms
Bevacizumab, Pemetrexed, Adenocarcinoma, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Cisplatin, Female, Glutamates, Guanine, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Proportional Hazards Models, Treatment Outcome, Disease-Free Survival, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Maintenance Chemotherapy, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review