Cited by 67Lung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Research Studies

Pemetrexed plus platinum as the first-line treatment option for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Open access
Li, Ming, Zhang, Qian, Fu, Peifang, Li, Ping, Peng, Aimei, Zhang, Guoliang, Song, Xiaolian, Tan, Min +5 more·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

UNLABELLED: To compare the efficacy and toxicities of pemetrexed plus platinum with other platinum regimens in patients with previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed using trials identified through PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Two investigators independently assessed the quality of the trials and extracted data. The outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and different types of toxicity. Hazard ratios (HRs), odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using RevMan software. RESULTS: Four trials involving 2,518 patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC met the inclusion criteria. Pemetrexed plus platinum chemotherapy (PPC) improved survival compared with other platinum-based regimens (PBR) in patients with advanced NSCLC (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.83-1.00, p = 0.04), especially in those with non-squamous histology (HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.77-0.98, p = 0.02). No statistically significant improvement in either PFS or RR was found in PPC group as compared with PBR group (HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.94-1.13, p = 0.57; OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.95-1.39, p = 0.15, respectively). Compared with PBR, PPC led to less grade 3-4 neutropenia and leukopenia but more grade 3-4 nausea. However, hematological toxicity analysis revealed significant heterogeneities. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that PPC in the first-line setting leads to a significant survival advantage with acceptable toxicities for advanced NSCLC patients, especially those with non-squamous histology, as compared with other PRB. PPC could be considered as the first-line treatment option for advanced NSCLC patients, especially those with non-squamous histology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0037229

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pemetrexed-based combination chemotherapy shows a slight but significant survival benefit compared with gemcitabine- or docetaxel-based combinations.

    “Pemetrexed-based combination chemotherapy represents a therapeutic option, based on the results of a recent meta-analysis that showed a slight but significant survival benefit compared with gemcitabine-or docetaxel-based combinations and of a pre-planned subgroup analysis of a large randomised phase III trial [II, A] [54, 55].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]Higgins JP Green S 2008 Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions updated March 2011 John Wiley & Sons Available: http://www.cochrane-handbook.org/. Accessed: 2011 DEC 12

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, M., Zhang, Q., Fu, P., Li, P., Peng, A., Zhang, G., Song, X., Tan, M., Li, X., Liu, Y., Wu, Y., Fan, S., & Wang, C.
Affiliations
  • Tongji University (CN)
  • Fudan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Changhui
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-05-17
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
e37229
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088088880
Cited by
67
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
Keywords
pemetrexed, platinum-based chemotherapy, advanced non-small cell lung cancer, first-line therapy, overall survival, progression-free survival, response rate, hematologic toxicity, neutropenia, non-squamous histology, nausea
MeSH terms
Pemetrexed, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Glutamates, Guanine, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Organoplatinum Compounds, Treatment Outcome, Platinum Compounds, Disease-Free Survival

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review