Cited by 280interferon and immune responsesCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

Preliminary results of the first-in-human (FIH) study of MK-1454, an agonist of stimulator of interferon genes (STING), as monotherapy or in combination with pembrolizumab (pembro) in patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphomas

Open access
Harrington, K.J., Brody, J., Ingham, M., Strauss, J., Cemerski, S., Wang, M., Tse, A., Khilnani, A. +2 more·2018·Annals of Oncology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/annonc/mdy424.015

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • STING-activating agents have shown limited efficacy in early-phase clinical trials in cancer patients, either as monotherapy or in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

    “early-phase clinical trials with these agents in cancer patients, either as monotherapy or in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors, have so far shown lack of efficacy26–28.”

    From Epigenetic state determines the in vivo efficacy of STING agonist therapy (2023) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Abstract reports no complete or partial responses with MK-1454 monotherapy, but six partial responses among 25 evaluated patients receiving MK-1454 plus pembrolizumab. Its conclusion calls the combination’s efficacy “encouraging,” contrary to the claim that the combination showed a lack of efficacy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Clinical trials in cancer patients currently testing STING activating drugs as monotherapy or in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors have so far provided little, if any, evidence of objective responses.

    “However, clinical trials in cancer patients currently testing STING activating drugs as a monotherapy or in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors have so far provided little, if any, evidence of objective responses26–28.”

    From Epigenetic state determines the in vivo efficacy of STING agonist therapy (2023) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Results (abstract, p. viii712) report no complete or partial responses with MK-1454 monotherapy, but six partial responses among 25 patients (24%) receiving MK-1454 plus pembrolizumab. Those objective responses contradict the claim that the trials provided little, if any, evidence of objective responses, although the monotherapy result is consistent with it. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Preliminary data showed that some combination therapies (ADU-S100 plus spartalizumab, MK-1454 plus pembrolizumab, manganese plus α-PD-1) had encouraging antitumor activity with a tolerable safety profile.

    “The preliminary data showed that some combination therapies (e.g. ADU-S100 plus spartalizumab, MK-1454 plus pembrolizumab, manganese plus α-PD-1) had encouraging antitumor activity with a tolerable safety profile [270, 275, 276].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harrington, K. J., Brody, J., Ingham, M., Strauss, J., Cemerski, S., Wang, M., Tse, A., Khilnani, A., Marabelle, A., & Golan, T.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Cancer Research (GB)
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Mary Crowley Cancer Research Center (US)
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
  • Institut Gustave Roussy (FR)
  • Sheba Medical Center (IL)
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
29
Pages
viii712
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898106814
Cited by
280
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 20
FWCI
9.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › interferon and immune responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
STING agonist, cyclic dinucleotides, pembrolizumab, immune checkpoint inhibitor combination, advanced solid tumors, lymphoma, antitumor immunity, intratumoral administration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review