Cited by 1,547EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningSecond Language Learning and Teaching

A Framework for the Implementation of Task-based Instruction

SKEHAN, P.·1996·Applied Linguistics

Abstract

This paper examines recent proposals for task-based approaches to instruction It reviews relevant research, before going on to examine a number of potential problems with task-based teaching, such as a potential focus away from form and towards lexis It reviews recent developments in cognitive psychology which support a dual-mode perspective for language processing, and then proposes the goals of accuracy, complexity-restructuring, and fluency as the most relevant for task-based instruction In the final section, the paper proposes a framework for the implementation of task-based instruction which draws upon relevant theory and research, and which organizes the methods by which such instruction could be put into practice in such a way as to minimize problems, and maximize the probability that all three above goals can be achieved

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/applin/17.1.38

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Numerous implementation variables other than planning time can affect the difficulty of performing a task, such as performing a similar task first, listening to a model performance, brainstorming topic ideas, and pressure to perform rapidly.

    “But there are numerous other implementation variables that can affect the difficulty of performing a taskfor example, asking the learners to perform a similar task first (Prabhu, 1987), asking learners to listen to a model performance of the task (Aston, 1982), brainstorming ideas relevant to the topic of the task (Skehan, 1996), and, +/pressure to perform the task rapidly (Yuan and Ellis, 2003).”

    From Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward (2017) · cites this paper as Skehan, 1996

  • The main and repetition tasks can be regarded as task families with similar language or cognitive demands.

    “For that reason, the main and repetition tasks can be regarded as ' “task families”, where a group of tasks resemble one another and may well have similar language or cognitive demands' (Skehan, 1996, p. 56).”

    From Focus on form through task repetition in TBLT (2016) · cites this paper as Skehan, 1996

  • The first time learners carry out a task, they are so preoccupied with completing the task that they focus almost completely on content and not necessarily on linguistic accuracy.

    “Based on theories on learners having limited attentional resources, Skehan (1996Skehan ( , 1998) ) argues that the first time learners at Universiteit van Amsterdam on April 11, 2016 ltr.sagepub.comDownloaded from carry out a task they are so preoccupied with completing the task that they focus almost completely on the content and not necessarily on linguistic accuracy.”

    From Focus on form through task repetition in TBLT (2016) · cites this paper as Skehan, 1996

  • Fluency reflects the primacy of meaning and the capacity to cope with real-time communication.

    “Skehan (1992Skehan ( , 1996)), following Schmidt (1990), takes fluency to reflect the primacy of meaning and the capacity to cope with real-time communication.”

    From The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance (1996) · cites this paper as Skehan, 1996

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SKEHAN, P.
Affiliations
University of West London (GB)
Corresponding author
SKEHAN, P.
Venue
Applied Linguistics
Published
1996-03-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
38-62
ISSN
  • 0142-6001 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-450X
OpenAlex
W1975978582
Cited by
1,547
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 107 · 2019: 115 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 82 · 2016: 78 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 73 · 2013: 72 · 2012: 60
FWCI
100.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Linguistics (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
task-based language teaching, accuracy, fluency, lexis, form-focused instruction, implementation framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review