A Framework for the Implementation of Task-based Instruction
Abstract
This paper examines recent proposals for task-based approaches to instruction It reviews relevant research, before going on to examine a number of potential problems with task-based teaching, such as a potential focus away from form and towards lexis It reviews recent developments in cognitive psychology which support a dual-mode perspective for language processing, and then proposes the goals of accuracy, complexity-restructuring, and fluency as the most relevant for task-based instruction In the final section, the paper proposes a framework for the implementation of task-based instruction which draws upon relevant theory and research, and which organizes the methods by which such instruction could be put into practice in such a way as to minimize problems, and maximize the probability that all three above goals can be achieved
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Numerous implementation variables other than planning time can affect the difficulty of performing a task, such as performing a similar task first, listening to a model performance, brainstorming topic ideas, and pressure to perform rapidly.
“But there are numerous other implementation variables that can affect the difficulty of performing a taskfor example, asking the learners to perform a similar task first (Prabhu, 1987), asking learners to listen to a model performance of the task (Aston, 1982), brainstorming ideas relevant to the topic of the task (Skehan, 1996), and, +/pressure to perform the task rapidly (Yuan and Ellis, 2003).”
From Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward (2017) · cites this paper as Skehan, 1996
The main and repetition tasks can be regarded as task families with similar language or cognitive demands.
“For that reason, the main and repetition tasks can be regarded as ' “task families”, where a group of tasks resemble one another and may well have similar language or cognitive demands' (Skehan, 1996, p. 56).”
From Focus on form through task repetition in TBLT (2016) · cites this paper as Skehan, 1996
The first time learners carry out a task, they are so preoccupied with completing the task that they focus almost completely on content and not necessarily on linguistic accuracy.
“Based on theories on learners having limited attentional resources, Skehan (1996Skehan ( , 1998) ) argues that the first time learners at Universiteit van Amsterdam on April 11, 2016 ltr.sagepub.comDownloaded from carry out a task they are so preoccupied with completing the task that they focus almost completely on the content and not necessarily on linguistic accuracy.”
From Focus on form through task repetition in TBLT (2016) · cites this paper as Skehan, 1996
Fluency reflects the primacy of meaning and the capacity to cope with real-time communication.
“Skehan (1992Skehan ( , 1996)), following Schmidt (1990), takes fluency to reflect the primacy of meaning and the capacity to cope with real-time communication.”
From The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance (1996) · cites this paper as Skehan, 1996
Cites
The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1
SCHMIDT, R. W. (1990) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129 · Cited by 4,910 · see citing works
Three Approaches to Task-Based Syllabus Design
Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1992) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587368 · Cited by 866 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100015047 · Cited by 1,147 · see citing works
Self-citationExploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners
Kormos, J., & Dénes (2004) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001 · Cited by 679 · see citing works
Issues in Teachers' Reinterpretation of a Task-Based Innovation in Primary Schools
Carless, D. (2004) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588283 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials
Ellis, R. (1997) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/51.1.36 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Focus on form: A critical review
Ellis, R. (2016) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168816628627 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1999) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1191/136216899672186140 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Self-citationSome reflections on task-based language performance assessment
Bachman, L. F. (2002) · Language Testing · doi:10.1191/0265532202lt240oa · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward
Ellis, R. (2017) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444817000179 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning
Lynch, T., & Maclean, J. (2000) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/136216880000400303 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Classroom Learning, Teaching, and Research: A Task‐Based Perspective
PICA, T. (2005) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00309.x · Cited by 179 · see citing works
VAN DE GUCHTE, M., BRAAKSMA, M., RIJLAARSDAM, G., & BIMMEL, P. (2015) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12211 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
T(w)o and fro: using the L1 as a language teaching tool in the CLIL classroom
Gallagher, F., & Colohan, G. (2017) · The Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2014.947382 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Focus on form through task repetition in TBLT
van de Guchte, M., Braaksma, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Bimmel, P. (2016) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168815609616 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Design and application of automatic feedback scaffolding in forums to promote learning
Wang, Q., Rose, C. P., Ma, N., Jiang, S., Bao, H., & Li, Y. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2022.3156914 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- SKEHAN, P.
- Affiliations
- University of West London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- SKEHAN, P.
- ORCID
- SKEHAN, P.
- Venue
- Applied Linguistics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-03-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 38-62
- ISSN
- 0142-6001 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-450X
- OpenAlex
- W1975978582
- Cited by
- 1,547
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 66 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 107 · 2019: 115 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 82 · 2016: 78 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 73 · 2013: 72 · 2012: 60
- FWCI
- 100.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Linguistics (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Keywords
- task-based language teaching, accuracy, fluency, lexis, form-focused instruction, implementation framework
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review