Cited by 179EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Learning and TeachingSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

Classroom Learning, Teaching, and Research: A Task‐Based Perspective

PICA, TERESA·2005·The Modern Language Journal

Abstract

In an increasing number of second language (L2) classrooms, teachers and researchers are taking on new roles and responsibilities. From these new perspectives, they are developing similar concerns about L2 learning processes, which they typically express in ways that reflect their different backgrounds and goals. To support learning, teaching, and research in the L2 classroom, researchers and teachers have attempted to develop activities that both address their concerns and accommodate their differences on a long‐term basis. This article reflects my participation as a researcher in this context and presents the ways in which the teachers and students with whom I have worked have turned to information gap tasks to serve many of our needs. The first part of the article describes the contributions of information gap tasks as seen from our learning, teaching, and research perspectives. The second part describes the issues and challenges we have faced in integrating and implementing them. Then the third part presents an approach that we have developed for designing information gap tasks both as authentic activities for teaching and learning and as reliable instruments for research. Examples of our tasks are provided, together with excerpts from the discourse of their classroom implementation. These excerpts reveal the effectiveness of the tasks in drawing students' attention to form, function, and meaning in ways that we considered vital to students' L2 learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00309.x

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Apart from interlocutor characteristics, there are numerous task features that may impact interaction.

    “Apart from interlocutor characteristics, there are numerous task features that may impact interaction (e.g.Doughty & Pica 1986;Robinson 2001;Pica 2005;Keck et al. 2006;Pica, Kang & Sauro 2006;Kim 2008;Tavakoli & Foster 2008;Jenks 2009;Kormos & Trebits 2012).”

    From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as Pica 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PICA, T.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
PICA, TERESA
Venue
The Modern Language Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-08-22
Volume
89
Issue
3
Pages
339-352
ISSN
  • 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4781
OpenAlex
W2136044730
Cited by
179
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
47.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Modern Language Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
information-gap tasks, second language classroom, task-based language teaching, task design, teacher-researcher collaboration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review