Cited by 482EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

The development of fluency in advanced learners of French

TOWELL, R., HAWKINS, R., BAZERGUI, N.·1996·Applied Linguistics

Abstract

In this article, it will be argued that the proceduralization of linguistic knowledge is the most important factor in the development of fluency in advanced second language learners Levelt's (1989) model of language production is used to provide the descriptive base for the sub-processes of language production This posits the existence of a conceplualizer, a formulator, and an articulator, each of which contains procedural knowledge Levelt's model does not, however, deal with how that knowledge is developed It is proposed that Anderson's (1983) model of adaptive control of thought may be used to account for developmental aspects This posus that the learning process involves the conversion of declarative knowledge into procedural knowledge via cognitive, associative, and autonomous stages of compilation and tuning Neither Levelt nor Anderson, however, have stated how the contribution of the sub-processes or how the developmental stages may be measured in language use It is argued that the temporal variables used by Grosjean andDeschamps (1972, 1973, 1975) provide a way of fluency and (b) the contribution of the sub-processed in the model Evidece from 12 advanced learners of French and English is used to show how this may be done Initial results from expertments indicate that on a specific task learners became more fluent (as measured by speaking rate) as a result of the period of residence abroad and that an increase in mean length of run was the most important of the temporal…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/applin/17.1.84

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
TOWELL, R., HAWKINS, R., & BAZERGUI, N.
Affiliations
University of Essex (GB)
Venue
Applied Linguistics
Published
1996-03-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
84-119
ISSN
  • 0142-6001 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-450X
OpenAlex
W2039838847
Cited by
482
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 24
FWCI
61.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Linguistics (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • British Association for Applied Linguistics
  • Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
second language fluency, procedural knowledge, declarative knowledge, advanced learners, French as a second language, speech rate, temporal variables, syntax, lexical phrases, residence abroad

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review