The development of fluency in advanced learners of French
Abstract
In this article, it will be argued that the proceduralization of linguistic knowledge is the most important factor in the development of fluency in advanced second language learners Levelt's (1989) model of language production is used to provide the descriptive base for the sub-processes of language production This posits the existence of a conceplualizer, a formulator, and an articulator, each of which contains procedural knowledge Levelt's model does not, however, deal with how that knowledge is developed It is proposed that Anderson's (1983) model of adaptive control of thought may be used to account for developmental aspects This posus that the learning process involves the conversion of declarative knowledge into procedural knowledge via cognitive, associative, and autonomous stages of compilation and tuning Neither Levelt nor Anderson, however, have stated how the contribution of the sub-processes or how the developmental stages may be measured in language use It is argued that the temporal variables used by Grosjean andDeschamps (1972, 1973, 1975) provide a way of fluency and (b) the contribution of the sub-processed in the model Evidece from 12 advanced learners of French and English is used to show how this may be done Initial results from expertments indicate that on a specific task learners became more fluent (as measured by speaking rate) as a result of the period of residence abroad and that an increase in mean length of run was the most important of the temporal…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cognitive load of writing is lower than that of speaking.
“Therefore, the cognitive load of writing is lower than that of speaking (Towell et al., 1996; Grabowski, 2007).”
From Syntactic Networks of Interlanguage Across L2 Modalities and Proficiency Levels (2021) · cites this paper as Towell et al., 1996
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners
Kormos, J., & Dénes (2004) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001 · Cited by 679 · see citing works
Fluency in Writing: Generating Text in L1 and L2
CHENOWETH, N. A., & HAYES, J. R. (2001) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088301018001004 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
de Jong, N., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00620.x · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Fluency in Second Language Testing: Insights From Different Disciplines
De Jong, N. H. (2018) · Language Assessment Quarterly · doi:10.1080/15434303.2018.1477780 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Exploring Connections Between First and Second Language Fluency: A Mixed Methods Approach
PELTONEN, P. (2018) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12516 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Sato, M. (2014) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.05.004 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Syntactic Networks of Interlanguage Across L2 Modalities and Proficiency Levels
Hao, Y., Wang, X., Wu, M., & Liu, H. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643120 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- TOWELL, R., HAWKINS, R., & BAZERGUI, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Essex (GB)
- ORCID
- HAWKINS, R.
- Venue
- Applied Linguistics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-03-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 84-119
- ISSN
- 0142-6001 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-450X
- OpenAlex
- W2039838847
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 61.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Linguistics (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- British Association for Applied Linguistics
- Economic and Social Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- second language fluency, procedural knowledge, declarative knowledge, advanced learners, French as a second language, speech rate, temporal variables, syntax, lexical phrases, residence abroad
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review