Cited by 37EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningLinguistics and Language Analysis

Exploring the construct of interactional oral fluency: Second Language Acquisition and Language Testing approaches

Sato, Masatoshi·2014·System

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.system.2014.05.004

Cites

127 of 127 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 130 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sato, M.
Affiliations
Universidad Andrés Bello (CL)
Corresponding author
Sato, Masatoshi
Venue
System
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
45
Pages
79-91
ISSN
0346-251X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046916173
Cited by
37
References
130
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
8.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
System (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
Keywords
second language acquisition, language assessment, peer interaction, verbal protocols, speech rate, pauses, turn-taking, rater perceptions, Japanese learners of English

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review