The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feedback, Noticing and Instructed Second Language Learning
Abstract
Second language acquisition researchers have claimed that feedback provided during conversational interaction facilitates second language (L2) acquisition. A number of experimental studies have supported this claim, connecting interactional feedback with L2 development. Researchers have suggested that interactional feedback is associated with L2 learning because it prompts learners to notice L2 forms. This study explores the relationships between feedback, instructed ESL learners’ noticing of L2 form during classroom interactions and their subsequent L2 development. Interactional feedback was provided to learners in response to their production problems with questions, plurals, and past tense forms. Learners’ noticing was assessed through on-line learning journals, introspective comments while viewing classroom videotapes, and questionnaire responses. Through a controlled pre-test, post-test design, analyses of noticing and learning were carried out for each learner. The results point to an interesting, complex and positive relationship between interactional feedback in the classroom, the learners’ reports about noticing and their learning of L2 question forms.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Investigation into the effects of interaction on L2 development has been considered a component of instructed second language acquisition (ISLA) (e.g.Mackey 2006;Loewen 2015;Long 2017;VanPatten 2017b), which is concerned with the manipulation of the processes and mechanisms of L2 learning.”
From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as Mackey 2006
In the citing paper
“This difficulty is evident from a body of research revealing that learners' attention is drawn to certain features more than others when there is no external manipulation, regardless of the target language (e.g.English : Mackey 2006;French: Ayoun 2001;Japanese: Loschky 1994).”
From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as Mackey 2006
In the citing paper
“Mackey also found that while there was some correspondence in the noticing identified by the different measures, there were also discrepancies, leading her to suggest that noticing might be best viewed as a continuum.”
From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as Mackey (2006)
In the citing paper
“She found that learners' reports of noticing related to linguistic development in some areas (e.g.questions) but not in others (e.g.past tense).”
From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as Mackey (2006)
In the citing paper
“However, there is also evidence to suggest that when the focus on form leads to learners consciously attending to linguistic forms they are more likely to learn what they have attended to (Mackey, 2006).”
From Focus on form: A critical review (2016) · cites this paper as Mackey, 2006
In the citing paper
“but to date there is little evidence to show a consistent direct effect of such noticing on acquisition (see, for example, Mackey (2006).”
From Focus on form: A critical review (2016) · cites this paper as Mackey (2006)
Citations
Cites
The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1
SCHMIDT, R. W. (1990) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129 · Cited by 5,435
The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition
Long, M. H. (1996) · Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1016/b978-012589042-7/50015-3 · Cited by 3,927
CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND LEARNER UPTAKE: Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classrooms
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263197001034 · Cited by 2,629
(1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,917
Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input1
Long, M. H. (1983) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/4.2.126 · Cited by 1,433
THE ROBUSTNESS OF CRITICAL PERIOD EFFECTS IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION
DeKeyser, R. M. (2000) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100004022 · Cited by 1,432
SWAIN, M., & LAPKIN, S. (1995) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/16.3.371 · Cited by 1,407
Schmidt, R. (2001) · Cognition and Second Language Instruction · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524780.003 · Cited by 1,322
Second language research methods
Seliger, H. W., & Shohamy, E. (1989) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 1,071
Stimulated Recall Methodology in Second Language Research
Gass, S. M., Gass, S. M., Mackey, A., & Mackey, A. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410606006 · Cited by 969
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Long, M. H. 2006. ‘Recasts in SLA: The story so far’ in Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (Chapter Four).
- Long, M. H. and P. Robinson.1998. ‘Focus on form: Theory, research, process’ in C. Doughty and J. Williams (eds): Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 15–41.
- Mackey, A. in press. ‘The relationship between conversational interaction and second language acquisition’ in A. Mackey (ed.): Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition: A Collection of Empirical Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press (Chapter One).
- Miyake, A. and N. F. Friedman.1998. ‘Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as “language aptitude” ’ in A. E. Healy and L. E. Bourne (eds): Foreign Language Learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 339–64.
- Packard, J. L. 1991. ‘Implications for classroom-based research of various research designs’ in B. F. Freedman (ed.): Foreign Language Acquisition Research and the Classroom. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company, pp. 354–62.
- Pienemann, M. and M.Johnston.1987. ‘Factors influencing the development of language proficiency’ in D. Nunan (ed.): Applying Second Language Acquisition Research. Adelaide: National Curriculum Resource Centre, AMEP, pp. 45–141.
- Roberts, M. 1995. ‘Awareness and the efficacy of error correction’ in R. Schmidt (ed.): Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning (Tech. Rep. #9), Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’I, pp. 162–82.
- Schmidt, R. 1995. ‘Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning’ in R. Schmidt (ed.): Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, pp. 1–63.
- Schmidt, R. and S. Frota.1986. ‘Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese’ in R. Day (ed.): ‘Talking to learn’: Conversation in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, pp. 237–326.
- Silver, R. E. 2000. ‘Input, output, and negotiation: Conditions for second language development’ in B. Swierzbin, F. Morris, M. E. Anderson, C. A. Klee, and E. Tarone (eds): Social and Cognitive Factors in Second Language Acquisition: Selected proceedings of the 1999 Second Language Research Forum. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 345–71.
- Swain, M. 1998. ‘Focus on form through conscious reflection’ in C. Doughty and J. Williams (eds): Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ORAL FEEDBACK IN CLASSROOM SLA: A Meta-Analysis
Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263109990520 · Cited by 838
“1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 (2) When the study reported proportions of participants who showed improvements, Cohen’s d was calculated based on arcsine transformation (Lipsey & Wilson; see, e.g., Mackey, 2006 ): Cohen’s d = arcsine treatment – arcsine control .”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialInteractions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x · Cited by 746
“…examples of these from the primary studies include: free writing tasks (e.g., Bitchener, Young, & Cameron, 2005; Spada et al., 2005), picture description tasks (e.g., Izumi & Lakshmanan, 1998; Mackey, 2006), and picture-cued information gap tasks (e.g., Mackey, 1999, 2006; Mackey & Oliver, 2002).”
BackgroundOral corrective feedback in second language classrooms
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444812000365 · Cited by 741
“Depending on the interactional context, learners are likely to notice the corrective quality of recasts (Oliver & Mackey 2003), especially in cases where the recasts have been shortened and/or provided with added stress to highlight the error. Also beneficial are recasts provided by a teacher to scaffold interaction d…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialGass, S. M., Behney, J., Plonsky, L., Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2001) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410604651 · Cited by 549
Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2006.05.002 · Cited by 509
Ellis, R. (2010) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263109990544 · Cited by 479
“Mackey ( 2006 ), for example, investigated learners’ perceptions of the gap between their own production and recasts by examining the learners’ online learning journals, conducting a stimulated recall, and administering questionnaires.”
Focus on form: A critical review
Ellis, R. (2016) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168816628627 · Cited by 417
“There is clear evidence that learners do notice the corrections they receive even in implicit types of CF such as recasts (Egi, 2007), but to date there is little evidence to show a consistent direct effect of such noticing on acquisition (see, for example, Mackey, 2006).”
BackgroundRecasts in the Adult English L2 Classroom: Characteristics, Explicitness, and Effectiveness
LOEWEN, S., & PHILP, J. (2006) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00465.x · Cited by 408
Aspects of working memory in L2 learning
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (2011) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444810000509 · Cited by 249
“The relationship between attentional demands in L2 tasks and WM capacity is receiving increasing attention by L2 researchers (Ellis 2001; Mackey 2006b; Rai et al. in press).”
BackgroundInfluentialInteraction and instructed second language acquisition
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444818000125 · Cited by 377
“…expended considerable effort investigating the effects of interaction not only on L2 development but also on attention, awareness, and noticing (e.g. Mackey, Gass & McDonough 2000; Williams 2001b; Philp 2003; Gass & Alvarez Torres 2005; Mackey 2006; Philp & Iwashita 2013; Sagarra & Abbuhl 2013).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEnjoyment and anxiety in second language communication: An idiodynamic approach
Boudreau, C., MacIntyre, P. D., & Dewaele, J. (2018) · Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.1.7 · Cited by 405
“Such activities might allow learners to better notice L2 input (Mackey, 2006), helping build resources for the future by including specific language experiences stemming from interpersonal interactions that accumulate learners’ social capital (Gregersen, MacIntyre, & Meza, 2016).”
ATTENTION, AWARENESS, AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN LANGUAGE LEARNING
Schmidt, R. (2010) · Cited by 359
Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning
Sheen, Y. (2008) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00480.x · Cited by 330
“, Bigelow, de Mas, Hansen, & Tarone, 2006); learners’ perceptions/noticing of recasts; and whether there is modified output following the recasts (e.g., Egi, 2007a; Mackey, 2006; McDonough & Mackey, 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialTask-based language teaching theory and practice
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020) · Cited by 284
Quantitative Research Methods, Study Quality, and Outcomes: The Case of Interaction Research
Plonsky, L., & Gass, S. (2011) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00640.x · Cited by 267
“, Fotos, 1993; Philp, 2003; uptake sheets, Mackey, 2006) and offline (stimulated recall, journals, questionnaires, and introspective interviews following interaction; e.g., Lai & Zhao, 2006; Mackey, 2006) data collection techniques.”
PEER INTERACTION AND CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK FOR ACCURACY AND FLUENCY DEVELOPMENT
Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2012) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263112000356 · Cited by 298
“For example, Mackey ( 2006 ) showed that learners who noticed the corrective nature of feedback improved more than those who did not report noticing (but see Bigelow, delMas, Hansen, & Tarone, 2006 ).”
BackgroundResponses to Recasts: Repetitions, Primed Production, and Linguistic Development
McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2006) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00393.x · Cited by 259
Self-citationCORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND WORKING MEMORY CAPACITY IN INTERACTION-DRIVEN L2 LEARNING
Goo, J. (2012) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263112000149 · Cited by 257
“…role of recasts in L2 development (see Doughty & Varela, 1998 ; Han, 2002 ; Ishida, 2004 ; Iwashita, 2003 ; Leeman, 2003 ; Long, Inagaki, & Ortega, 1998 ; Mackey, 2006 ; Mackey & Philp, 1998 ; McDonough & Mackey, 2006 ; Révész, 2009 ; see also Long, 2007 , for a review and Mackey & Goo, 2007 ).”
BackgroundWaring, H. Z. (2008) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00788.x · Cited by 260
“, Sinclair & Coulthard, 1975), feedback in SLA (e.g., Aljaafreh & Lantolf, 1994; Mackey, 2006), and an issue of more general concern—learning opportunities (e.”
BackgroundTask-Based Language Teaching: Theory and Practice
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108643689 · Cited by 407
The Routledge Handbook of Language Awareness
Garrett, P., & Cots, J. M. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315676494 · Cited by 216
Twenty-five years of research on oral and written corrective feedback in System
Li, S., & Vuono, A. (2019) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2019.05.006 · Cited by 271
Beyond form-focused instruction: Reflections on past, present and future research
Spada, N. M. (2010) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444810000224 · Cited by 209
“Current research on learner attention and noticing should provide more insightful responses to these questions in the future (e.g. Leow 1997, 1998; Mackey 2006).”
BackgroundUptake, Modified Output, and Learner Perceptions of Recasts: Learner Responses as Language Awareness
Egi, T. (2010) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00980.x · Cited by 193
Yang, Y., & Lyster, R. (2010) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263109990519 · Cited by 344
“Several studies have suggested that recasts of phonological and lexical errors are more noticeable than recasts of errors in morphosyntax (Carpenter, Jeon, MacGregor, & Mackey, 2006 ; Ellis, Basturkmen, & Loewen, 2001 ; Han, 2008 ; Lyster, 1998 ; Mackey, Gass, & McDonough, 2000 ; Sheen, 2006 ).”
BackgroundResultEye tracking as a measure of noticing: A study of explicit recasts in SCMC
Smith, B. (2012) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44300 · Cited by 177
“A well-executed stimulated recall approach to determining what learners notice (awareness at the level of noticing) in the input seems to be a strong choice for researchers in that it provides complementary data for understanding, for example, the effect of corrective feedback (Egi, 2007; Mackey, 2006; Mackey et al.,…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTHE INTERSECTION OF TASK-BASED INTERACTION, TASK COMPLEXITY, AND WORKING MEMORY
Kim, Y., Payant, C., & Pearson, P. (2015) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263114000618 · Cited by 169
“This was similar to the criterion used in other SLA studies involving question development (e.g., Mackey & Philp, 1998 ; McDonough, 2005 ; McDonough & Mackey, 2006 ; Philp, 2003 ; Spada & Lightbown, 1993 ).”
TASK COMPLEXITY, LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES, AND KOREAN EFL LEARNERS’ QUESTION DEVELOPMENT
Kim, Y. (2012) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263112000368 · Cited by 161
“Thus, separate measures for L2 learning should be provided to determine L2 development (Philp, Oliver, & Mackey, 2006 ).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialEgi, T. (2007) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263107070416 · Cited by 137
“…the recast as feedback or as the NS’s confirmation of meaning+ Despite the growing body of research on noticing of interactional feedback ~e+g+, Mackey, 2006; Mackey, Gass, & McDonough, 2000; Philp, 2003; Roberts, 1995!, little research has addressed how learners interpret the recasts…”
BackgroundThe Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching
Nuzzo, E., & Velásquez, D. C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327 · Cited by 138
Mobile-assisted grammar exercises: Effects on self-editing in L2 writing
Li, Z., & Hegelheimer, V. H. (2013) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44343 · Cited by 135
“According to the interactionist theory, input includes materials that learners should be exposed to for language development; input is typically a target like model, which provides positive evidence to learners (Mackey, 2006).”
Mixed methods research: toward new research designs in applied linguistics
Hashemi, M. R., & Babaii, E. (2013) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12049.x · Cited by 183
INPUT, INTAKE, AND CONSCIOUSNESS
Truscott, J., & Smith, M. S. (2011) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263111000295 · Cited by 104
“Mackey ( 2006 ) described the NH as the claim “that learners must consciously notice input” (p. 408).”
BackgroundKeck, C., & Kim, Y. (2014) · John Benjamins Publishing Company eBooks · doi:10.1075/z.190 · Cited by 102
Analyses of Move Structure and Verb Tense of Research Article Abstracts in Applied Linguistics
Tseng, F.-P. (2011) · International Journal of English Linguistics · doi:10.5539/ijel.v1n2p27 · Cited by 95
Spada, N. M., Shiu, J. L., & Tomita, Y. (2015) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12129 · Cited by 103
How Do Teachers and Learners Perceive Corrective Feedback in the Japanese Language Classroom?
Yoshida, R. (2010) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01022.x · Cited by 102
Potential of automated writing evaluation feedback
Cotos, E. (2011) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.11139/cj.28.2.420-459 · Cited by 95
“Feedback is an essential aspect of interaction, and it is generally viewed as a form of negative evidence that can help the learners notice the mismatch between the target language and their own interlanguage form (Mackey, 2006).”
BackgroundCoyle, Y., & de Larios, J. R. (2013) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263113000612 · Cited by 97
“…is required on task to verbalize their thoughts aloud (Sachs & Polio, 2007 ), and (b) nonveridicality, as, under communicative pressure, learners may either fail to verbalize everything they notice, or they may report noticing that has not actually taken place (Jourdenais, 2001 ; Mackey, 2006 ).”
BackgroundMethodFang, W., Yeh, H., Luo, B.-R., & Chen, N. (2020) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344020000208 · Cited by 127
“Because large classroom sizes make it harder for instructors to overcome these challenges (Bruton, 2005; Carless, 2007), implementing TBLT may not effectively foster language processing and conversational interaction, which are considered essential for language learning (Mackey, 2006).”
BackgroundThe use of corpus examples for language comprehension and production
Frankenberg‐Garcia, A. (2014) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344014000093 · Cited by 109
“While there have been several empirical studies supportive of this hypothesis (e.g. Leow 2000; Izumi 2002; Mackey 2006), it is important to note that there are two separate processes”
BackgroundHernández, T. A. (2011) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168810388694 · Cited by 55
“As Mackey (2006) and McDonough (2005) as well as other researchers have shown that feedback is an important aspect of the SLA process, future studies should address the specific contribution of interactional feedback in promoting acquisition of discourse markers.”
BackgroundRaising language awareness in peer interaction: a cross-context, cross-methodology examination
Sato, M., & Ballinger, S. (2012) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658416.2011.639884 · Cited by 111
“…and CF can trigger this noticing process; otherwise, the given input may be unnoticed and unprocessed and thus a learner may lose the opportunity to acquire new knowledge or modify the existing L2 knowledge (Carroll & Swain, 1993; Doughty, 1994; Doughty & Varela, 1998; Gass, 1991; Mackey, 2006).”
BackgroundWritten Languaging, Direct Correction, and Second Language Writing Revision
Suzuki, W. (2012) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00720.x · Cited by 92
Beyond paradigm: The ‘what’ and the ‘how’ of classroom research
Whong, M., Gil, K., & Marsden, H. (2014) · Second language Research · doi:10.1177/0267658314526749 · Cited by 88
“…include research on different types of explicit and/or implicit instruction (e.g. Benati, 2005; Ellis et al., 2006; Izumi and Lakshmanan, 1998), corrective feedback (e.g. Carroll and Swain, 1993; Mackey, 2006; Philp, 2003) and interaction (e.g. Ellis et al., 1994; Long, 1996; Pica et al., 1987).”
BackgroundEFFICACY OF RECASTS AND GESTURES ON THE ACQUISITION OF LOCATIVE PREPOSITIONS
Nakatsukasa, K. (2016) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263115000467 · Cited by 89
“…studies used stimulated sessions as a methodology for eliciting learner noticing during classroom interaction (e.g., Carpenter, Jeon, MacGregor, & Mackey, 2006 ; Egi, 2007 ; Kim & Han, 2007 ; Mackey et al., 2000 ; Mackey, McDonough, Fujii, & Tatsumi, 2001 ; Polio, Gass, & Chapin, 2006 ; Roberts,…”
Rao, K., & Torres, C. (2016) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.342 · Cited by 94
Attention and awareness in second language acquisition
Polio, C. G. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203808184-24 · Cited by 86
Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach
(2017) · AILA applied linguistics series · doi:10.1075/aals.16 · Cited by 80
Teachers' Intentions and Learners' Perceptions about Corrective Feedback in the L2 Classroom
Mackey, A., Al-Khalil, M., Atanassova, G., Hama, M., Logan‐Terry, A., & Nakatsukasa, K. (2007) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.2167/illt047.0 · Cited by 77
“Linguistic target Using a similar method to Roberts (1995), Mackey et al . (2000) found that learners’ perceptions about corrective feedback were influenced by the linguistic target of the feedback. Ten learners of English as a second language (ESL) and seven learners of Italian as a foreign language (IFL) participate…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationZhang, H., Song, W., Shen, S., & Huang, R. (2014) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.860 · Cited by 79
“Such noticing is essential to effective L2 acquisition, especially to the acquisition of L2 forms (Mackey, 2006).”
BackgroundScaffolded Feedback, Recasts, and L2 Development: A Sociocultural Perspective
Rassaei, E. (2014) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12060.x · Cited by 92
Incidental Focus on Form in University Spanish Literature Courses
Zyzik, E. C., & Polio, C. G. (2008) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00686.x · Cited by 74
Interactional feedback in learner-learner interactions in a task-based EFL classroom
Fujii, A., & Mackey, A. (2009) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral.2009.012 · Cited by 71
Self-citationJunqueira, L., & Kim, Y. (2013) · Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes · doi:10.3138/cmlr.1536 · Cited by 72
“However, according to Amy’s SLA syllabus2, two weeks were devoted to focus-on-form techniques, and the students read articles suggesting the benefits of CF (e.g., Mackey, 2006).”
MethodRouhshad, A., Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2015) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168815584455 · Cited by 78
“Jake: yeah Several studies (e.g. Ammar & Spada, 2006; Bitchener, 2004; Mackey, 2006) and meta-analyses (Li, 2010; Mackey & Goo, 2007) have suggested that negotiations are conducive to second language development.”
BackgroundCorrective feedback, learners' perceptions, and second language development
Rassaei, E. (2013) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2013.05.002 · Cited by 71
ATTENTION TO IRREGULAR VERBS BY BEGINNING LEARNERS OF GERMAN
Godfroid, A., & Uggen, M. S. (2013) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263112000897 · Cited by 39
2. Peer interaction and metacognitive instruction in the EFL classroom
Fujii, A., Ziegler, N., & Mackey, A. (2016) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.45.03fuj · Cited by 65
Self-citationCoyle, Y., & de Larios, J. R. (2020) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2020.102374 · Cited by 71
Attention to Form and Meaning Revisited
Leow, R. P., Hsieh, H.-C., & Moreno, N. (2008) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00453.x · Cited by 59
“Greenslade, Bouden, & Sanz, 1999; Leow, 1993; Mackey, 2006; Shook, 1994; Williams & Evans, 1998; Wong, 2001).”
Parlak, Ö., & Ziegler, N. (2017) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263116000310 · Cited by 58
“…2007; Mackey, Gass, & McDonough, 2000), with studies demonstrating evidence confirming the occurrence of negotiation for phonological features but also for L2 learners successfully understanding the intent of phonological feed-back (Carpenter, Jeon, MacGregor, & Mackey, 2006; Lyster & Saito, 2010).”
BackgroundThe effect of personalized feedback on listening and reading skills in the learning of EFL
Pérez-Segura, J. J., Ruiz, R. S., González‐Calero, J. A., & Gutiérrez, R. C. (2020) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1705354 · Cited by 56
“As Mackey (2006) notes, research on second language acquisition has demonstrated that feedback develops such acquisition.”
BackgroundThe noticeability and effectiveness of corrective feedback in relation to target type
Kartchava, E., & Ammar, A. (2014) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168813519373 · Cited by 62
“In the laboratory context, recasts have been shown to positively affect language learning when they were not compared to another CF condition (Han, 2002; Leeman, 2003; McDonough & Mackey, 2006) and when no control group was involved (Ishida, 2004).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEffects of communication mode and salience on recasts: A first exposure study
Yılmaz, Y., & Yüksel, D. (2011) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168811412873 · Cited by 59
“Mackey (2006) found that learners were more likely to notice English question forms than the past tense morpheme after receiving interactional feedback, including recasts.”
BackgroundReinvestigating the Noticing Function of Output
Uggen, M. S. (2012) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00693.x · Cited by 58
Employing Eye-Tracking Technology in Researching the Effectiveness of Recasts in CMC
SMITH, B. K. (2010) · Educational linguistics · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9136-9_6 · Cited by 53
Learners' Beliefs as Mediators of What Is Noticed and Learned in the Language Classroom
Kartchava, E., & Ammar, A. (2013) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.101 · Cited by 58
The effects of learner profiles on pragmalinguistic awareness and learning
Takahashi, S. (2014) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.09.004 · Cited by 58
Reducing international graduate students’ language anxiety through oral pronunciation corrections
Lee, E. J. (2015) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2015.11.006 · Cited by 58
10. A procedure for testing the Noticing Hypothesis in the context of vocabulary acquisition
Godfroid, A., Housen, A., & Boers, F. (2010) · Converging evidence in language and communication research · doi:10.1075/celcr.13.14god · Cited by 52
de la Fuente, M. J. (2012) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2012.733710 · Cited by 49
“Attention to input is, then, a crucial internal variable, and research in SLA has provided empirical evidence for its role in L2 development (e.g. Leow, 1997, 2000; Mackey, 2006; Rosa & Leow, 2004).”
BackgroundKhalil, A.-H. A., & Khalil, M. (2011) · Georgetown University-Graduate School of Arts & Sciences · Cited by 48
Verbal Reports, Noticing, and SLA Research
Egi, T. (2004) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658410408668810 · Cited by 49
Aloesnita, N. M. A. N., & Alwi, N. A. N. M. (2010) · Cited by 48
Interaction, Feedback and Task Research in Second Language Learning
Mackey, A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108589284 · Cited by 62
Self-citationAssessing the effectiveness of interactional feedback for L2 acquisition: Issues and challenges
Nassaji, H. (2020) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444819000375 · Cited by 53
“While some have shown a positive relationship (e.g., Nabei & Swain, 2002; McDonough, 2005), others have either failed to show a connection (Mackey & Philp, 1998; McDonough & Mackey, 2006) or have found that the relationship depends on the nature of the modified output or repair (Nassaji, 2011).”
BackgroundMethodWhy Some Things Are Better Done in Tandem
Horgues, C., & Scheuer, S. (2015) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137509437_3 · Cited by 44
From classroom to workplace: tracking socio-pragmatic development
Holmes, J., & Riddiford, N. (2010) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/ccq071 · Cited by 43
Mackey, A., & Bryfonski, L. (2018) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-59900-1_5 · Cited by 42
Self-citationArdasheva, Y., Norton‐Meier, L. A., & Hand, B. M. (2015) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057267.2015.1078019 · Cited by 41
The Influence of Implementing Role-play as an Educational Technique on EFL Speaking Development
Encalada, M. A. R., & Villafuerte, J. (2018) · Theory and Practice in Language Studies · doi:10.17507/tpls.0807.02 · Cited by 50
“Role-plays (RP) offers multiple opportunities to practice a foreign language than any other teaching activity (Lee and Smagorinsky, 2000; and Gass and Mackey, 2006).”
BackgroundTask-Based Teacher Training: Implementation and Evaluation in Central American Bilingual Schools
Bryfonski, L. (2019) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 40
Collaborative Attention Work on Gender Agreement in Italian as a Foreign Language
Kunitz, S. (2018) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12458 · Cited by 39
Focus-on-form through peer feedback in a Spanish–American telecollaborative exchange
Lee, L. (2011) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658416.2011.592589 · Cited by 41
“There has been considerable discussion about the role of corrective feedback and its efficacy in foreign language (L2) development (e.g., Long, 1996; Mackey, 2006; Nassaji & Swain, 2000).”
BackgroundMethodInteraction, Output, and Communicative Language Learning
Swain, M., & Suzuki, W. (2008) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470694138.ch39 · Cited by 38
Lynch, T. (2009) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501220802379109 · Cited by 38
“…of the nature and effect of feedback in the classroom has concentrated on immediate feedback, whether from the teacher (Doughty and Varela 1998; Lightbown 1998; Lyster 2004; Mackey 2006; Mackey, Gass, and McDonough 2000; Sheen 2004) or from peers (Gaies 1983; Gass and Varonis 1994; Oliver 2000).”
BackgroundThe Instructed Learning of Form–Function Mappings in the English Article System
Zhao, H., & MacWhinney, B. (2017) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12449 · Cited by 39
“We can think of cue focusing as an instantiation of the general role of noticing (Mackey, 2006; Robinson, 1995; Schmidt, 1990) in second language acquisition.”
BackgroundEgi, T. (2008) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658410802146859 · Cited by 35
“…have gathered stimulated recall comments from learners either before (e.g. Adams, 2003; Egi, 2007; Lapkin et al., 2002; Lindgren & Sullivan, 2003; Nabei & Swain, 2002; Swain & Lapkin, 2002) or after (Egi, 2004; Mackey, 2006; Mackey et al., 2002) the administration of post-treatment measures.”
BackgroundAkiyama, Y., & Saito, K. (2016) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12338 · Cited by 36
An Exploration of Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing
Rahimivand, M., & Kuhi, D. (2014) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.570 · Cited by 33
Wang, C., Tseng, W., Chen, Y.-L., & Cheng, H.-F. (2019) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-019-00492-y · Cited by 35
“…learners to use the target language for interpersonal and intergroup communication, interaction has been recognized as a necessary aspect of the languageacquisition process—a process in which the language classroom plays a major role (e.g., Hymes 1971; Long 1996; Mackey 1999, 2006; Swain 1985).”
BackgroundLearners’ perceptions and performance under peer versus teacher corrective feedback conditions
Mahvelati, E. H. (2021) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100995 · Cited by 59
Bao, M., Egi, T., & Han, Y. (2011) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2011.05.001 · Cited by 32
'Would you perhaps consider ...': hedged comments in ESL writing
Nurmukhamedov, U., & Kim, S. (2009) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/ccp063 · Cited by 32
Zhao, Y. (2015) · ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) · Cited by 32
The Cognition Hypothesis, the Triadic Componential Framework and the SSARC Model
Robinson, P. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.013 · Cited by 35
Liu, Y. (2008) · Asia Pacific Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/02188790701850071 · Cited by 33
“This observation is clearly very much in line with well-established findings concerning the need for meaning to be negotiated in the language classroom (Hall & Walsh, 2002; Mackey, 2006).”
InfluentialIncidental Focus on Form, Noticing and Vocabulary Learning in the EFL Classroom
Soler, E. A. (2007) · Digitum: Institutional Repository of the University of Murcia (University of Murcia) · doi:10.6018/ijes.7.2.48981 · Cited by 30
“…feedback in incidental focus on form, although in this study teachers’ use of recasts seems to play a role in vocabulary learning, we McDonough and Mackey (2006) that there is a need to investigate the impact of recasts on L2 their effect on vocabulary learning, but, as suggested by Loewen and…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Mackey, A.
- Affiliations
- Georgetown University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mackey, Alison
- ORCID
- Mackey, Alison
- Venue
- Applied Linguistics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-09-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 405-430
- ISSN
- 0142-6001 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-450X
- OpenAlex
- W2101121875
- Cited by
- 536
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 37
- FWCI
- 116.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Linguistics (publishedVersion)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
- Keywords
- interactional feedback, noticing, second language acquisition, English as a second language, classroom interaction, question forms, plural nouns, past tense, learner journals, introspective reports
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review