Cited by 202Gene expression and cancer classificationGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Gaussian mixture clustering and imputation of microarray data

Open access
Ouyang, Ming, Welsh, William J., Georgopoulos, Panos·2004·Bioinformatics

Abstract

MOTIVATION: In microarray experiments, missing entries arise from blemishes on the chips. In large-scale studies, virtually every chip contains some missing entries and more than 90% of the genes are affected. Many analysis methods require a full set of data. Either those genes with missing entries are excluded, or the missing entries are filled with estimates prior to the analyses. This study compares methods of missing value estimation. RESULTS: Two evaluation metrics of imputation accuracy are employed. First, the root mean squared error measures the difference between the true values and the imputed values. Second, the number of mis-clustered genes measures the difference between clustering with true values and that with imputed values; it examines the bias introduced by imputation to clustering. The Gaussian mixture clustering with model averaging imputation is superior to all other imputation methods, according to both evaluation metrics, on both time-series (correlated) and non-time series (uncorrelated) data sets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth007

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ouyang, M., Welsh, W. J., & Georgopoulos, P.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Ouyang, Ming
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2004-01-29
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
917-923
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2119253710
Cited by
202
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 31
FWCI
4.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  • Commission on Higher Education
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES 0522)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (G08LM006230, 2 G08 LM06230-01AI)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
microarray data, missing data imputation, Gaussian mixture model clustering, model averaging, gene expression data, imputation accuracy, clustering bias, temporal gene expression
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Cell Cycle, Models, Genetic, Sensitivity and Specificity, Yeasts, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical, Cluster Analysis, Normal Distribution, Artifacts, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Benchmarking, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review