Cited by 121Gene expression and cancer classificationBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

DNA microarray data imputation and significance analysis of differential expression

Jörnsten, Rebecka, Wang, Hui-Yu, Welsh, William J., Ouyang, Ming·2005·Bioinformatics

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Significance analysis of differential expression in DNA microarray data is an important task. Much of the current research is focused on developing improved tests and software tools. The task is difficult not only owing to the high dimensionality of the data (number of genes), but also because of the often non-negligible presence of missing values. There is thus a great need to reliably impute these missing values prior to the statistical analyses. Many imputation methods have been developed for DNA microarray data, but their impact on statistical analyses has not been well studied. In this work we examine how missing values and their imputation affect significance analysis of differential expression. RESULTS: We develop a new imputation method (LinCmb) that is superior to the widely used methods in terms of normalized root mean squared error. Its estimates are the convex combinations of the estimates of existing methods. We find that LinCmb adapts to the structure of the data: If the data are heterogeneous or if there are few missing values, LinCmb puts more weight on local imputation methods; if the data are homogeneous or if there are many missing values, LinCmb puts more weight on global imputation methods. Thus, LinCmb is a useful tool to understand the merits of different imputation methods. We also demonstrate that missing values affect significance analysis. Two datasets, different amounts of missing values, different imputation methods, the standard t-test and the regularized t-test and ANOVA are employed in the simulations. We conclude that good imputation alleviates the impact of missing values and should be an integral part of microarray data analysis. The most competitive methods are LinCmb, GMC and BPCA. Popular imputation schemes such as SVD, row mean, and KNN all exhibit high variance and poor performance. The regularized t-test is less affected by missing values than the standard t-test. AVAILABILITY: Matlab code is available on request from the authors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti638

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jörnsten, R., Wang, H.-Y., Welsh, W. J., & Ouyang, M.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées (FR)
  • University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
  • Jörnsten, Rebecka
  • Ouyang, Ming
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2005-08-23
Volume
21
Issue
22
Pages
4155-4161
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2136714708
Cited by
121
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. National Library of Medicine (G08LM006230, G08 LM06230-03A1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
microarray data, missing data imputation, differential gene expression, significance assessment, analysis of variance, high-dimensional data, imputation method comparison
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Analysis of Variance, Data Interpretation, Statistical, False Positive Reactions, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Liver, Liver Neoplasms, Models, Genetic, Software, Models, Statistical, Cluster Analysis, Sample Size, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, Microarray Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review