The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computational cluster validation in post-genomic data analysis
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: The discovery of novel biological knowledge from the ab initio analysis of post-genomic data relies upon the use of unsupervised processing methods, in particular clustering techniques. Much recent research in bioinformatics has therefore been focused on the transfer of clustering methods introduced in other scientific fields and on the development of novel algorithms specifically designed to tackle the challenges posed by post-genomic data. The partitions returned by a clustering algorithm are commonly validated using visual inspection and concordance with prior biological knowledge—whether the clusters actually correspond to the real structure in the data is somewhat less frequently considered. Suitable computational cluster validation techniques are available in the general data-mining literature, but have been given only a fraction of the same attention in bioinformatics. Results: This review paper aims to familiarize the reader with the battery of techniques available for the validation of clustering results, with a particular focus on their application to post-genomic data analysis. Synthetic and real biological datasets are used to demonstrate the benefits, and also some of the perils, of analytical cluster validation. Availability: The software used in the experiments is available at http://dbkgroup.org/handl/clustervalidation/ Contact: J.Handl@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk Supplementary information: Enlarged colour plots are provided in the Supplementary Material, which is available at http://dbkgroup.org/handl/clustervalidation/
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns
Eisen, M. B., Spellman, P. T., Brown, P. O., & Botstein, D. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863 · Cited by 16,184
Hubert, L., & Arabie, P. (1985) · Journal of Classification · doi:10.1007/bf01908075 · Cited by 8,219
Estimating the Number of Clusters in a Data Set Via the Gap Statistic
Tibshirani, R., Walther, G., & Hastie, T. (2001) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00293 · Cited by 6,205
Ankerst, M. (1999) · doi:10.1145/304181.304187 · Cited by 3,982
'Gene shaving' as a method for identifying distinct sets of genes with similar expression patterns
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Eisen, M. B., Alizadeh, A., Levy, R., Staudt, L., Chan, W. C., Botstein, D., & Brown, P. (2000) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2000-1-2-research0003 · Cited by 547 · cited 1×
“Prominent examples include biclustering techniques [51] and gene shaving [33], which have both been specifically designed to deal with the particular challenges posed by gene expression data.”
BackgroundKell, D. B., & Oliver, S. G. (2004) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.10385 · Cited by 535
Self-citation
Cited by
Is My Network Module Preserved and Reproducible?
Langfelder, P., Luo, R., Oldham, M. C., & Horvath, S. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001057 · Cited by 1,012
Defining functional areas in individual human brains using resting functional connectivity MRI
Cohen, A. L., Fair, D. A., Dosenbach, N. U. F., Miezin, F. M., Dierker, D., Van Essen, D. C., Schlaggar, B. L., & Petersen, S. E. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.066 · Cited by 582
Multiobjective Optimization in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
Handl, J., Kell, D. B., & Knowles, J. (2007) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2007.070203 · Cited by 308
Self-citationPloran, E. J., Nelson, S. M., Velanova, K., Donaldson, D. I., Petersen, S. E., & Wheeler, M. E. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3522-07.2007 · Cited by 282
“Thus, the cophenetic r when using UPGMA will always be greater than or equal to the cophenetic r when using single or complete linkage (Handl et al., 2005).”
MethodInfluentialQuantitative Analysis of Synaptic Phosphorylation and Protein Expression
Trinidad, J. C., Thalhammer, A., Specht, C. G., Lynn, A. J., Baker, P. R., Schoepfer, R., & Burlingame, A. L. (2008) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m700170-mcp200 · Cited by 194
Metadata
- Authors
- Handl, J., Knowles, J., & Kell, D. B.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-08-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 3201-3212
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2133098435
- Cited by
- 898
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 41.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.