The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drug-target interaction prediction from chemical, genomic and pharmacological data in an integrated framework
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: In silico prediction of drug–target interactions from heterogeneous biological data is critical in the search for drugs and therapeutic targets for known diseases such as cancers. There is therefore a strong incentive to develop new methods capable of detecting these potential drug–target interactions efficiently. Results: In this article, we investigate the relationship between the chemical space, the pharmacological space and the topology of drug–target interaction networks, and show that drug–target interactions are more correlated with pharmacological effect similarity than with chemical structure similarity. We then develop a new method to predict unknown drug–target interactions from chemical, genomic and pharmacological data on a large scale. The proposed method consists of two steps: (i) prediction of pharmacological effects from chemical structures of given compounds and (ii) inference of unknown drug–target interactions based on the pharmacological effect similarity in the framework of supervised bipartite graph inference. The originality of the proposed method lies in the prediction of potential pharmacological similarity for any drug candidate compounds and in the integration of chemical, genomic and pharmacological data in a unified framework. In the results, we make predictions for four classes of important drug–target interactions involving enzymes, ion channels, GPCRs and nuclear receptors. Our comprehensively predicted drug–target interaction networks enable us to suggest many potential drug–target interactions and to increase research productivity toward genomic drug discovery. Supplementary information: Datasets and all prediction results are available at http://cbio.ensmp.fr/~yyamanishi/pharmaco/. Availability: Softwares are available upon request. Contact: yoshihiro.yamanishi@ensmp.fr
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Identification of common molecular subsequences
Smith, T. F., & Waterman, M. S. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(81)90087-5 · Cited by 9,940
KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment
Kanehisa, M., Araki, M., Goto, S., Hattori, M., Hirakawa, M., Itoh, M., Katayama, T., Kawashima, S., Okuda, S., Tokimatsu, T., et al. (2007) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm882 · Cited by 6,782
Self-citationFrom genomics to chemical genomics: new developments in KEGG
Kanehisa, M. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkj102 · Cited by 3,120
Self-citationDrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets
Wishart, D. S., Knox, C., Guo, A. C., Cheng, D., Shrivastava, S., Tzur, D., Gautam, B., & Hassanali, M. (2008) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm958 · Cited by 2,861
A Fast Flexible Docking Method using an Incremental Construction Algorithm
Rarey, M., Kramer, B., Lengauer, T., & Klebe, G. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0477 · Cited by 2,827
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20
Bonilla, E. V., Chai, K. M. A., & Williams, C. K. I. (2008) · neural information processing systems · Cited by 2,701
Yıldırım, M. A., Goh, K.-I., Cusick, M. E., Barabási, A.-L., & Vidal, M. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1338 · Cited by 1,708
Drug target identification using side-effect similarity
Campillos, M., Kuhn, M., Gavin, A.-C., Jensen, L. J., & Bork, P. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1158140 · Cited by 1,248
Prediction of drug–target interaction networks from the integration of chemical and genomic spaces
Yamanishi, Y., Araki, M., Gutteridge, A., Honda, W., & Kanehisa, M. (2008) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn162 · Cited by 1,147
Self-citationKernel Methods in Computational Biology
(2004) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4057.001.0001 · Cited by 1,032
Cited by
Gaussian interaction profile kernels for predicting drug–target interaction
van Laarhoven, T., Nabuurs, S. B., & Marchiori, E. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr500 · Cited by 934
Structure and dynamics of molecular networks: A novel paradigm of drug discovery
Csermely, P., Korcsmáros, T., Kiss, H. J. M., London, G., & Nussinov, R. (2013) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.01.016 · Cited by 892
Prediction of Drug-Target Interactions and Drug Repositioning via Network-Based Inference
Cheng, F., Liu, C., Jiang, J., Lu, W., Li, W., Liu, G., Zhou, W., Huang, J., & Tang, Y. (2012) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002503 · Cited by 818
Drug–target interaction prediction: databases, web servers and computational models
Chen, X., Yan, C. C., Zhang, X., Zhang, X., Dai, F., Yin, J., & Zhang, Y. (2016) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbv066 · Cited by 658
Machine learning approaches and databases for prediction of drug–target interaction: a survey paper
Bagherian, M., Sabeti, E., Wang, K., Sartor, M. A., Nikolovska-Coleska, Z., & Najarian, K. (2021) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbz157 · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- Yamanishi, Y., Kotera, M., Kanehisa, M., & Goto, S.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-06-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- i246-i254
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2139516171
- Cited by
- 470
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 23.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drug-target interaction prediction from chemical, genomic and pharmacological data in an integrated framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq176
- The paper
- Yamanishi, Y., Kotera, M., Kanehisa, M., & Goto, S. (2010). Drug-target interaction prediction from chemical, genomic and pharmacological data in an integrated framework. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq176
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.