Cited by 147

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

RERconverge: an R package for associating evolutionary rates with convergent traits

Kowalczyk, Amanda, Meyer, Wynn K, Partha, Raghavendran, Mao, Weiguang, Clark, Nathan L, Chikina, Maria·2019·Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Motivation: When different lineages of organisms independently adapt to similar environments, selection often acts repeatedly upon the same genes, leading to signatures of convergent evolutionary rate shifts at these genes. With the increasing availability of genome sequences for organisms displaying a variety of convergent traits, the ability to identify genes with such convergent rate signatures would enable new insights into the molecular basis of these traits. Results: Here we present the R package RERconverge, which tests for association between relative evolutionary rates of genes and the evolution of traits across a phylogeny. RERconverge can perform associations with binary and continuous traits, and it contains tools for visualization and enrichment analyses of association results. Availability and implementation: RERconverge source code, documentation and a detailed usage walk-through are freely available at https://github.com/nclark-lab/RERconverge. Datasets for mammals, Drosophila and yeast are available at https://bit.ly/2J2QBnj. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz468

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RERconverge is an R package for the genome-wide association of convergent evolutionary rate shifts with convergent phenotypes.

    “we introduce categorical methods within RERconverge, an R package for the genome-wide association of convergent evolutionary rate shifts with convergent phenotypes (Kowalczyk et al. 2019).”
  • PCOC is available as a container and RERconverge is available as an R package.

    “such as PCOC being available as a container (Rey et al. 2018) or RERconverge being available as an R package Kowalczyk et al. 2019”

    From From Trees to Traits: A Review of Advances in PhyloG2P Methods and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as Kowalczyk et al. 2019

  • Previous RERconverge ancestral trait reconstruction functionality was only available for binary or continuous traits and used an approximate maximum parsimony approach for binary traits and estimation of maximum likelihood states for continuous traits.

    “Previous RERconverge ancestral trait reconstruction functionality was only available for binary or continuous traits and used an approximate maximum parsimony approach for binary traits and estimation of maximum likelihood states for continuous traits (Maddison 1989; Kowalczyk et al. 2019; Revell 2024).”
  • Using a likelihood ratio test, the all rates different (ARD) model was selected to infer the ancestral states.

    “Using a likelihood ratio test, as implemented in the expanded categorical RERconverge (Pagel 1994; Kowalczyk et al. 2019), we selected the all rates different (ARD) model to infer the ancestral states”
  • RERconverge quantifies the rate of substitution along a branch as an evolutionary rate and computes relative evolutionary rates (RERs) that reflect whether a given gene is evolving slower or faster than expected along a branch of the phylogeny.

    “The rate of substitution along a branch is quantified as an evolutionary rate and, by correcting for factors affecting rates at all genes or on all branches of a phylogeny, we can compute relative evolutionary rates (RERs) that reflect whether a given gene is evolving slower or faster than expected along a branch of the phylogeny (Kowalczyk et al. 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Benjamini, 1995, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Methodol, 57, 289, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · DOI · Paper page
  2. Chikina, 2016, Hundreds of genes experienced convergent shifts in selective pressure in marine mammals, Mol. Biol. Evol, 33, 2182, 10.1093/molbev/msw112 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Eddelbuettel, 2011, Rcpp: seamless R and C++ integration, J. Stat. Softw, 40, 1, 10.18637/jss.v040.i08 · DOI
  4. Feldman, 2012, Constraint shapes convergence in tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channels of snakes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 4556, 10.1073/pnas.1113468109 · DOI
  5. Hiller, 2012, A “forward genomics” approach links genotype to phenotype using independent phenotypic losses among related species, Cell Rep, 2, 817, 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.08.032 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Kronforst, 2012, Unraveling the thread of nature’s tapestry: the genetics of diversity and convergence in animal pigmentation, Pigment Cell Melanoma Res, 25, 411, 10.1111/j.1755-148X.2012.01014.x · DOI
  7. Lartillot, 2011, A phylogenetic model for investigating correlated evolution of substitution rates and continuous phenotypic characters, Mol. Biol. Evol, 28, 729, 10.1093/molbev/msq244 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Li, 2010, The hearing gene Prestin unites echolocating bats and whales, Curr. Biol, 20, R55, 10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.042 · DOI
  9. Meyer, 2018, Ancient convergent losses of Paraoxonase 1 yield potential risks for modern marine mammals, Science, 361, 591, 10.1126/science.aap7714 · DOI
  10. Partha, 2017, Subterranean mammals show convergent regression in ocular genes and enhancers, along with adaptation to tunneling, Elife, 6, e25884, 10.7554/eLife.25884 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Partha, 2019, Robust methods for detecting convergent shifts in evolutionary rates, Mol. Biol. Evol, 10.1093/molbev/msz107 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Prudent, 2016, Controlling for phylogenetic relatedness and evolutionary rates improves the discovery of associations between species’ phenotypic and genomic differences, Mol. Biol. Evol, 33, 2135, 10.1093/molbev/msw098 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 2018, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
  14. Yang, 2007, PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood, Mol. Biol. Evol, 24, 1586, 10.1093/molbev/msm088 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kowalczyk, A., Meyer, W. K., Partha, R., Mao, W., Clark, N. L., & Chikina, M.
Affiliations
Department of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2019-06-13
Volume
35
Issue
22
Pages
4815-4817
ISSN
  • 1367-4803
  • 1367-4811
Cited by
147
References
1
Language
en
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01 HG009299-01A1, T32 EB009403)
  • University of Pittsburgh Center for Research Computing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review