Cited by 60

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Robust Method for Detecting Convergent Shifts in Evolutionary Rates

Partha, Raghavendran, Kowalczyk, Amanda, Clark, Nathan L, Chikina, Maria·2019·Molecular Biology and Evolution

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Identifying genomic elements underlying phenotypic adaptations is an important problem in evolutionary biology. Comparative analyses learning from convergent evolution of traits are gaining momentum in accurately detecting such elements. We previously developed a method for predicting phenotypic associations of genetic elements by contrasting patterns of sequence evolution in species showing a phenotype with those that do not. Using this method, we successfully demonstrated convergent evolutionary rate shifts in genetic elements associated with two phenotypic adaptations, namely the independent subterranean and marine transitions of terrestrial mammalian lineages. Our original method calculates gene-specific rates of evolution on branches of phylogenetic trees using linear regression. These rates represent the extent of sequence divergence on a branch after removing the expected divergence on the branch due to background factors. The rates calculated using this regression analysis exhibit an important statistical limitation, namely heteroscedasticity. We observe that the rates on branches that are longer on average show higher variance, and describe how this problem adversely affects the confidence with which we can make inferences about rate shifts. Using a combination of data transformation and weighted regression, we have developed an updated method that corrects this heteroscedasticity in the rates. We additionally illustrate the improved performance offered by the updated method at robust detection of convergent rate shifts in phylogenetic trees of protein-coding genes across mammals, as well as using simulated tree data sets. Overall, we present an important extension to our evolutionary-rates-based method that performs more robustly and consistently at detecting convergent shifts in evolutionary rates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/molbev/msz107

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trait loss may occur when a change in the environment of a lineage makes a trait redundant, or when a change in development has the side effect of causing a trait to no longer form.

    “Trait loss may occur when a change in the environment of a lineage makes a trait redundant (Partha et al. 2019), or when a change in development has the side effect of causing a trait to no longer form (Womack et al. 2018; Pereira and Kohlsdorf 2023; Womack and Hoke 2023).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Archer, 2011, Australia’s first fossil marsupial mole (Notoryctemorphia) resolves controversies about their evolution and palaeoenvironmental origins, Proc R Soc B Biol Sci., 278, 1498, 10.1098/rspb.2010.1943 · DOI
  2. Casper, 2018, The UCSC Genome Browser database: 2018 update, Nucleic Acids Res., 46, D762, 10.1093/nar/gkx1020 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Chikina, 2016, Hundreds of Genes Experienced Convergent Shifts in Selective Pressure in Marine Mammals, Mol Biol Evol., 33, 2182, 10.1093/molbev/msw112 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Di, 2011, The NBP Negative Binomial Model for Assessing Differential Gene Expression from RNA-Seq, Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol, 10, 1, 10.2202/1544-6115.1637 · DOI
  5. Eden, 2009, GOrilla: A tool for discovery and visualization of enriched GO terms in ranked gene lists, BMC Bioinformatics., 10, 48, 10.1186/1471-2105-10-48 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Eisen, 1998, Phylogenomics: Improving functional predictions for uncharacterized genes by evolutionary analysis, Genome Research., 8, 163, 10.1101/gr.8.3.163 · DOI
  7. Esteller, 2011, Non-coding RNAs in human disease, Nature Reviews Genetics., 12, 861, 10.1038/nrg3074 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Foote, 2015, Convergent evolution of the genomes of marine mammals, Nature Genetics., 47, 272, 10.1038/ng.3198 · DOI
  9. Hiller, 2012, A “Forward Genomics” Approach Links Genotype to Phenotype using Independent Phenotypic Losses among Related Species, Cell Reports., 2, 817, 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.08.032 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Jarvis, 2014, Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds, Science., 346, 1320, 10.1126/science.1253451 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Kowalczyk, 2018, RERconverge: an R package for associating evolutionary rates with convergent traits, bioRxiv
  12. Lartillot, 2011, A phylogenetic model for investigating correlated evolution of substitution rates and continuous phenotypic characters, Mol Biol Evol, 28, 729, 10.1093/molbev/msq244 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Law, 2014, voom: precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts, Genome Biol, 15, R29., 10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r29 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Li, 2014, Expansion of biological pathways based on evolutionary inference, Cell., 158, 213, 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.034 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Manolio, 2009, Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases, Nature., 461, 747, 10.1038/nature08494 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Marcovitz, 2016, “reverse Genomics” predicts function of human conserved noncoding elements, Mol Biol Evol, 33, 1358, 10.1093/molbev/msw001 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Meyer, 2018, Ancient convergent losses of Paraoxonase 1 yield potential risks for modern marine mammals, Science., 361, 591, 10.1126/science.aap7714 · DOI
  18. Murphy, 2001, Resolution of the early placental mammal radiation using bayesian phylogenetics, Science., 294, 2348, 10.1126/science.1067179 · DOI
  19. Murphy, 2007, Using genomic data to unravel the root of the placental mammal phylogeny, Genome Research., 17, 413, 10.1101/gr.5918807 · DOI
  20. Parker, 2013, Genome-wide signatures of convergent evolution in echolocating mammals, Nature., 502, 228, 10.1038/nature12511 · DOI
  21. Partha, 2017, Subterranean mammals show convergent regression in ocular genes and enhancers, along with adaptation to tunneling, eLife, 6, e25884, 10.7554/eLife.25884 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Pellegrini, 1999, Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: protein phylogenetic profiles, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96, 4285, 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4285 · DOI
  23. Pennacchio, 2013, Enhancers: Five essential questions, Nature Reviews Genetics., 14, 288, 10.1038/nrg3458 · DOI
  24. Prudent, 2016, Controlling for phylogenetic relatedness and evolutionary rates improves the discovery of associations between species’ phenotypic and genomic differences, Mol Biol Evol, 33, 2135, 10.1093/molbev/msw098 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Project Consortium TE, Consortium EP, 2012, An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome, Nature, 489, 57, 10.1038/nature11247 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Radivojac, 2013, A large-scale evaluation of computational protein function prediction, Nature Methods., 10, 221, 10.1038/nmeth.2340 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Ritchie, 2015, limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies, Nucleic acids research., 43, e47, 10.1093/nar/gkv007 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Robinson, 1981, Comparison of phylogenetic trees, Mathematical Biosciences., 53, 131, 10.1016/0025-5564(81)90043-2 · DOI
  29. Robinson, 2009, edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data, Bioinformatics, 26, 139, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Romanoski, 2015, Epigenomics: Roadmap for regulation, Nature., 518, 314, 10.1038/518314a · DOI · Paper page
  31. Roscito, 2018, Phenotype loss is associated with widespread divergence of the gene regulatory landscape in evolution, Nature Communications, 9, 10.1038/s41467-018-07122-z · DOI
  32. Sánchez, 2015, Long Non-Coding RNAs: Challenges for Diagnosis and Therapies, Nucleic Acid Therapeutics., 23, 15, 10.1089/nat.2012.0414 · DOI
  33. Schliep, 2011, phangorn: Phylogenetic analysis in R, Bioinformatics., 27, 592, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq706 · DOI
  34. Shlyueva, 2014, Transcriptional enhancers: From properties to genome-wide predictions, Nature Reviews Genetics., 15, 272, 10.1038/nrg3682 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Stern, 2013, The genetic causes of convergent evolution, Nat Rev Genet, 14, 751, 10.1038/nrg3483 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Su, 2004, A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences., 101, 6062, 10.1073/pnas.0400782101 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Thomas, 2015, Determining the null model for detecting adaptive convergence from genomic data: A case study using echolocating mammals, Molecular Biology and Evolution., 32, 1232, 10.1093/molbev/msv013 · DOI
  38. Yang, 2007, PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood, Mol Biol Evol, 24, 1586, 10.1093/molbev/msm088 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Zhang, 1997, Detection of convergent and parallel evolution at the amino acid sequence level, Molecular Biology and Evolution., 14, 527, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025789 · DOI
  40. Zou, 2015, No genome-wide protein sequence convergence for echolocation, Molecular Biology and Evolution., 32, 1237, 10.1093/molbev/msv014 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Partha, R., Kowalczyk, A., Clark, N. L., & Chikina, M.
Affiliations
Department of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
Venue
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Published
2019-05-11
Volume
36
Issue
8
Pages
1817-1830
ISSN
  • 0737-4038
  • 1537-1719
Cited by
60
References
3
Language
en
Funders
  • NIH (R01 HG009299-01A1, T32 EB009403)
  • HHMI-NIBIB

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review