Cited by 39Machine Learning in BioinformaticsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Artificial intelligence approaches to human-microbiome protein–protein interactions

Open access
Lim, Hansaim, Cankara, Fatma, Tsai, Chung-Jung, Keskin, Ozlem, Nussinov, Ruth, Gursoy, Attila·2022·Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Abstract

Host-microbiome interactions play significant roles in human health and disease. Artificial intelligence approaches have been developed to better understand and predict the molecular interplay between the host and its microbiome. Here, we review recent advancements in computational methods to predict microbial effects on human cells with a special focus on protein-protein interactions. We categorize recent methods from traditional ones to more recent deep learning methods, followed by several challenges and potential solutions in structure-based approaches. This review serves as a brief guide to the current status and future directions in the field.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102328

Cites

112 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bandyopadhyay S, et al.: A review of in silico approaches for analysis and prediction of HIV-1-human protein-protein in- teractions. Briefings Bioinf 2015, 16:830-851.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lim, H., Cankara, F., Tsai, C.-J., Keskin, O., Nussinov, R., & Gursoy, A.
Affiliations
  • Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (US)
  • Koç University (TR)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Nussinov, Ruth
Venue
Current Opinion in Structural Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-04
Volume
73
Pages
102328
ISSN
0959-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4211048753
Cited by
39
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Structural Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Collections portal (Koç University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHSN26120080001E)
  • National Institutes of Health (HHSN26120080001E)
  • National Cancer Institute (HHSN26120080001E)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
host-microbiome interactions, protein-protein interaction, artificial intelligence, deep learning, structure-based prediction, computational methods
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review