Cited by 5,270Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

ShinyGO: a graphical gene-set enrichment tool for animals and plants

Open access
Ge, Steven Xijin, Jung, Dongmin, Yao, Runan·2020·Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Gene lists are routinely produced from various omic studies. Enrichment analysis can link these gene lists with underlying molecular pathways and functional categories such as gene ontology (GO) and other databases. RESULTS: To complement existing tools, we developed ShinyGO based on a large annotation database derived from Ensembl and STRING-db for 59 plant, 256 animal, 115 archeal and 1678 bacterial species. ShinyGO's novel features include graphical visualization of enrichment results and gene characteristics, and application program interface access to KEGG and STRING for the retrieval of pathway diagrams and protein-protein interaction networks. ShinyGO is an intuitive, graphical web application that can help researchers gain actionable insights from gene-sets. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: http://ge-lab.org/go/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz931

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ge, S. X., Jung, D., & Yao, R.
Affiliations
  • Department of Mathematics and Statistics , Brookings, SD 57007, USA
  • South Dakota State University (US)
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2019-12-27
Volume
36
Issue
8
Pages
2628-2629
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2997022986
Cited by
5,270
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1074 · 2025: 1417 · 2024: 1204 · 2023: 783 · 2022: 419 · 2021: 235 · 2020: 110 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 3
FWCI
65.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (GM083226)
  • National Science Foundation/EPSCoR (IIA-1355423)
  • State of South Dakota
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
gene set enrichment analysis, Gene Ontology, pathway visualization, protein-protein interaction network, web application, annotation database, Ensembl, strings, plants, animals, archaea, bacteria
MeSH terms
Animals, Probability, Software, Databases, Factual, Computational Biology, Internet, Databases, Genetic, Gene Ontology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review