The DOI matches its Crossref record.
QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF HUMAN SURAL NERVE AT DIFFERENT AGES
Abstract
A qualitative and quantitative study was made of 27 sural nerves obtained within 24 hours of death from human subjects without history of disease or ingestion of drugs known to affect peripheral nerve. Parameters studied included fascicular area, internodal length and diameter of teased fibres, density of myelinated and unmyelinated axons, and axonal and fibre diameter. The slope of internodal length-fibre diameter regression lines increased progressively during the first decade but thereafter remained relatively constant until about the age of 60 years, after which degeneration and regeneration, and demyelination and remyelination caused increasing variation in internodal length. Densities of myelinated and unmyelinated axons decreased markedly from birth to the end of the eighth decade, due to increasing size and separation of fibres during the first decade, and axonal degeneration and an increase in endoneurial collagen in the older age groups. Except during the first year of life, the diameter distribution of myelinated fibres was bimodal, the lower mode occurring at 3-5 microns in all age groups and the upper shifting progressively from 5-6 microns at 1 year to 9-12 microns after the first decade. g ratios were generally higher in small than in large fibres and showed increasing scatter with age. The distribution of unmyelinated axons was unimodal until the fifth decade; thereafter the number of fine calibre axons increased. Ageing was associated with reduplication of vascular, and thickening of perineurial, basement membranes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sarcopenia: Aging-Related Loss of Muscle Mass and Function
Larsson, L., Degens, H., Li, M., Salviati, L., Lee, Y. I., Thompson, W., Kirkland, J. L., & Sandri, M. (2019) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00061.2017 · Cited by 1,797
Influence of aging on peripheral nerve function and regeneration
Verdu, E., Ceballos, D., Vilches, J. J., & Navarro, X. (2000) · Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System · doi:10.1046/j.1529-8027.2000.00026.x · Cited by 855
Epidermal Nerve Fiber Density: Normative Reference Range and Diagnostic Efficiency
McArthur, J. C., Stocks, E. A., Hauer, P., Cornblath, D. R., & Griffin, J. W. (1998) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.55.12.1513 · Cited by 560
The effect of age and gender on epidermal nerve fiber density
Gøransson, L. G., Mellgren, S. I., Lindal, S., & Omdal, R. (2004) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000113732.41127.8f · Cited by 207
Age and race effects on pain sensitivity and modulation among middle-aged and older adults
Riley, J. L., Cruz-Almeida, Y., Glover, T. L., King, C. D., Goodin, B. R., Sibille, K. T., Bartley, E. J., Herbert, M. S., Sotolongo, A., Fessler, B. J., et al. (2014) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2013.10.015 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- JACOBS, J. M., & LOVE, S.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1985
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 897-924
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2072248389
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF HUMAN SURAL NERVE AT DIFFERENT AGES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/108.4.897
- The paper
- JACOBS, J. M., & LOVE, S. (1985). QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF HUMAN SURAL NERVE AT DIFFERENT AGES. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/108.4.897
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.