The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visual control of locomotion in Parkinson's disease
Abstract
The effect of placing parallel lines on the walking surface on parkinsonian gait was evaluated. To identify the kind of visual cues (static or dynamic) required for the control of locomotion, we tested two visual conditions: normal lighting and stroboscopic illumination (three flashes/s), the latter acting to suppress dynamic visual cues completely. Sixteen subjects with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (nine males, seven females; mean age 68.8 years) and the same number of age-matched controls (seven males; nine females, mean age 67.5 years) were studied. During the baseline phase, Parkinson's disease patients walked with a short-stepped, slow velocity pattern. The double limb support duration was increased and the step cadence was reduced relative to normal. Under normal lighting, visual cues from the lines on the walking surface induced a significant improvement in gait velocity and stride length in Parkinson's disease patients. With stroboscopic illumination and without lines, both groups reduced their stride length and velocity but the changes were significant only in the Parkinson's disease group, indicating greater dependence on dynamic visual information. When stroboscopic light was used with stripes on the floor, the improvement in gait due to the stripes was suppressed in parkinsonian patients. These results demonstrate that the perceived motion of stripes, induced by the patient's walking, is essential to improve the gait parameters and thus favour the hypothesis of a specific visual-motor pathway which is particularly responsive to rapidly moving targets. Previous studies have proposed a cerebellar circuit, allowing the visual stimuli to by-pass the damaged basal ganglia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The relevance of the Lewy body to the pathogenesis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease.
Gibb, W. R., & Lees, A. J. (1988) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.51.6.745 · Cited by 3,481
Cited by
Dynamic Sensorimotor Interactions in Locomotion
Rossignol, S., Dubuc, R., & Gossard, J.-P. (2006) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00028.2005 · Cited by 1,096
Visual dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease
Weil, R. S., Schrag, A. E., Warren, J. D., Crutch, S. J., Lees, A. J., & Morris, H. R. (2016) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/aww175 · Cited by 481
“Patients with Parkinson’s disease carrying mutations in the gene for synuclein, SNCA, also show higher rates of cognitive deficits, REM sleep behaviour disorder (RBD) and hallucinations (Nishioka et al., 2009; Konno et al., 2016; Petrucci et al., 2016).”
BackgroundHerman, T., Giladi, N., Gruendlinger, L., & Hausdorff, J. M. (2007) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.05.015 · Cited by 315
A Technological Review of Wearable Cueing Devices Addressing Freezing of Gait in Parkinson’s Disease
Sweeney, D., Quinlan, L. R., Browne, P., Richardson, M., Meskell, P., & ÓLaighin, G. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19061277 · Cited by 103
A Common Optimization Principle for Motor Execution in Healthy Subjects and Parkinsonian Patients
Baraduc, P., Thobois, S., Gan, J., Broussolle, E., & Desmurget, M. (2013) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1482-12.2013 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Azulay, J.-P., Mesure, S., Amblard, B., Blin, O., Sangla, I., & Pouget, J.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111-120
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2157522178
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.