The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do women really have more bilateral language representation than men? A meta-analysis of functional imaging studies
Abstract
Sex differences in cognition are consistently reported, men excelling in most visuospatial tasks and women in certain verbal tasks. It has been hypothesized that these sex differences in cognition results from a more bilateral pattern of language representation in women than in men. This bilateral pattern of language representation in women is thought to interfere with visuospatial functions in the right hemisphere. To test whether language representation is indeed more bilateral in the female than in the male brain, a meta-analysis was performed on studies that assessed language activity with functional imaging in healthy men and women. Effect sizes were weighted for sample size and the meta-analytic method was applied to obtain a combined effect size. Fourteen studies were included, providing data on 377 men and 442 women. Meta-analysis yielded a mean weighted effect d of 0.21 with a 95% confidence interval of -0.05 to 0.48, indicating no significant difference in language lateralization between men and women. This implies that the putative sex difference in language lateralization may be absent at the population level, or may be observed only with some, as yet not defined, language tasks. It is therefore not likely that differences in language lateralization underlie the general sex differences in cognitive performance, and the neuronal basis for these cognitive sex differences remains elusive.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Functional disruption in the organization of the brain for reading in dyslexia
Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Pugh, K. R., Fulbright, R. K., Constable, R. T., Mencl, W. E., Shankweiler, D. P., Liberman, A. M., Skudlarski, P., Fletcher, J. M., et al. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.5.2636 · Cited by 872
An fMRI Study of Sex Differences in Regional Activation to a Verbal and a Spatial Task
Gur, R. C., Alsop, D., Glahn, D., Petty, R., Swanson, C. L., Maldjian, J. A., Turetsky, B. I., Detre, J. A., Gee, J., & Gur, R. E. (2000) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1006/brln.2000.2325 · Cited by 352 · cited 3×
“…No Included, d = 0.1 Vingerhoets et al., 1999 38 men, 52 women Several verbal tasks No Excluded: no separate data for spatial and verbal tasks Gur et al., 2000 14 men, 13 women Semantic decision Yes Included, d = 0.03 Kansaku et al., 2000 16 men, 14 women Story listening Yes Included, d =…”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Sowell, E. R., Peterson, B. S., Kan, E., Woods, R. P., Yoshii, J., Bansal, R., Xu, D., Zhu, H., Thompson, P. M., & Toga, A. W. (2007) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl066 · Cited by 695
Symmetries in human brain language pathways correlate with verbal recall
Catani, M., Allin, M. P. G., Husain, M., Pugliese, L., Mesulam, M. M., Murray, R. M., & Jones, D. K. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0702116104 · Cited by 650
Brain sensitivity to print emerges when children learn letter-speech sound correspondences
Brem, S., Bach, S., Kucian, K., Kujala, J. V., Guttorm, T. K., Martin, E., Lyytinen, H., Brandeis, D., & Richardson, U. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0904402107 · Cited by 456
Sex differences in neural processing of language among children
Burman, D. D., Bitan, T., & Booth, J. R. (2008) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.12.021 · Cited by 254
The dynamic role of genetics on cortical patterning during childhood and adolescence
Schmitt, J. E., Neale, M. C., Fassassi, B., Perez, J., Lenroot, R. K., Wells, E. M., & Giedd, J. N. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1311630111 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Sommer, I. E. C.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-06-16
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1845-1852
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2109117700
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do women really have more bilateral language representation than men? A meta-analysis of functional imaging studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/awh207
- The paper
- Sommer, I. E. C. (2004). Do women really have more bilateral language representation than men? A meta-analysis of functional imaging studies. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh207
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.