Cited by 456Reading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Brain sensitivity to print emerges when children learn letter-speech sound correspondences

Open access
Brem, Silvia, Bach, Silvia, Kucian, Karin, Kujala, Janne V., Guttorm, Tomi K., Martin, Ernst, Lyytinen, Heikki, Brandeis, Daniel +1 more·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The acquisition of reading skills is a major landmark process in a human's cognitive development. On the neural level, a new functional network develops during this time, as children typically learn to associate the well-known sounds of their spoken language with unfamiliar characters in alphabetic languages and finally access the meaning of written words, allowing for later reading. A critical component of the mature reading network located in the left occipito-temporal cortex, termed the "visual word-form system" (VWFS), exhibits print-sensitive activation in readers. When and how the sensitivity of the VWFS to print comes about remains an open question. In this study, we demonstrate the initiation of occipito-temporal cortex sensitivity to print using functional MRI (fMRI) (n = 16) and event-related potentials (ERP) (n = 32) in a controlled, longitudinal training study. Print sensitivity of fast (<250 ms) processes in posterior occipito-temporal brain regions accompanied basic associative learning of letter-speech sound correspondences in young (mean age 6.4 +/- 0.08 y) nonreading kindergarten children, as shown by concordant ERP and fMRI results. The occipito-temporal print sensitivity thus is established during the earliest phase of reading acquisition in childhood, suggesting that a crucial part of the later reading network first adopts a role in mapping print and sound.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0904402107

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the early stages of children or adults learning to read, left ventral occipitotemporal activation increased with learning and correlated with the rate of improvement in word recognition.

    “In the early stages of children or adults learning to read, left ventral occipitotemporal activation increased with learning (Brem et al., 2010; Dehaene et al., 2010b) and this correlated with the rate of improvement in word recognition (Ben-Shachar et al., 2011).”
  • Few long-term studies have followed brain changes that support reading growth in typical children.

    “For these reasons and others, long-term longitudinal studies of brain changes underlying reading development in the normal population are still quite rare, and the longitudinal perspective is used mostly for testing intervention effects (Brem et al., 2010; Shaywitz et al., 2004; Temple et al., 2003).”

    From The Development of Cortical Sensitivity to Visual Word Forms (2011) · cites this paper as Brem et al., 2010

  • The study shows rising word response curves in children as young as 7, consistent with recent German-reader reports.

    “We demonstrate rising response curves to words in children as young as 7 years, in agreement with recent reports in German readers (Brem et al., 2010).”

    From The Development of Cortical Sensitivity to Visual Word Forms (2011) · cites this paper as Brem et al., 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brem, S., Bach, S., Kucian, K., Kujala, J. V., Guttorm, T. K., Martin, E., Lyytinen, H., Brandeis, D., & Richardson, U.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University Children's Hospital Zurich (CH)
  • Agora (NL)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-04-15
Volume
107
Issue
17
Pages
7939-7944
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2090169869
Cited by
456
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 25
FWCI
51.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • Hartmann Müller-Stiftung für Medizinische Forschung
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
reading acquisition, phonological awareness, occipitotemporal cortex, early reading, kindergarten children, neural correlates of reading, alphabetic writing
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Brain Mapping, Child, Child, Preschool, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Language, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Occipital Lobe, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reading, Temporal Lobe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review