Cited by 230Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsMesenchymal stem cell research

Inflammation stimulates remyelination in areas of chronic demyelination

Foote, A. K.·2005·Brain

Abstract

A major challenge in multiple sclerosis research is to understand the cause or causes of remyelination failure and to devise ways of ameliorating its consequences. This requires appropriate experimental models. Although there are many models of acute demyelination, at present there are few suitable models of chronic demyelination. The taiep rat is a myelin mutant that shows progressive myelin loss and, by 1 year of age, its CNS tissue has many features of chronic areas of demyelination in multiple sclerosis: chronically demyelinated axons present in an astrocytic environment in the absence of acute inflammation. Using the taiep rat and a combination of X-irradiation and cell transplantation, it has been possible to address a number of questions concerning remyelination failure in chronic multiple sclerosis lesions, such as whether chronically demyelinated axons have undergone changes that render them refractory to remyelination and why remyelination is absent when oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs) are present. Our experiments show that (i) transplanted OPCs will not populate OPC-containing areas of chronic demyelination; (ii) myelination competent OPCs can repopulate OPC-depleted chronically demyelinated astrocytosed tissue, but this repopulation does not result in remyelination--closely resembling the situation found in some multiple sclerosis plaques; and (iii) the induction of acute inflammation in this non-remyelinating situation results in remyelination. Thus, we c…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awh417

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foote, A. K.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Foote, A. K.
Venue
Brain
Published
2005-01-05
Volume
128
Issue
3
Pages
528-539
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2170870485
Cited by
230
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
11.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
Keywords
remyelination, chronic demyelination, multiple sclerosis, oligodendrocyte precursor cells, cell transplantation, X-ray irradiation, acute inflammation, astrocytes, demyelination, remyelination failure, inhibiting factors
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Animals, Cell Division, Chronic Disease, Disease Models, Animal, Inflammation, Multiple Sclerosis, Myelin Sheath, Nerve Regeneration, Oligodendroglia, Rats, Mutant Strains, Spinal Cord, Stem Cells, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Disease Progression, Stem Cell Transplantation, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review