The cellular inflammatory response in human spinal cords after injury
Open accessAbstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) provokes an inflammatory response that generates substantial secondary damage within the cord but also may contribute to its repair. Anti-inflammatory treatment of human SCI and its timing must be based on knowledge of the types of cells participating in the inflammatory response, the time after injury when they appear and then decrease in number, and the nature of their actions. Using post-mortem spinal cords, we evaluated the time course and distribution of pathological change, infiltrating neutrophils, monocytes/macrophages and lymphocytes, and microglial activation in injured spinal cords from patients who were 'dead at the scene' or who survived for intervals up to 1 year after SCI. SCI caused zones of pathological change, including areas of inflammation and necrosis in the acute cases, and cystic cavities with longer survival (Zone 1), mantles of less severe change, including axonal swellings, inflammation and Wallerian degeneration (Zone 2) and histologically intact areas (Zone 3). Zone 1 areas increased in size with time after injury whereas the overall injury (size of the Zones 1 and 2 combined) remained relatively constant from the time (1-3 days) when damage was first visible. The distribution of inflammatory cells correlated well with the location of Zone 1, and sometimes of Zone 2. Neutrophils, visualized by their expression of human neutrophil alpha-defensins (defensin), entered the spinal cord by haemorrhage or extravasation, were most numerous 1-3 days after SCI, and were detectable for up to 10 days after SCI. Significant numbers of activated CD68-immunoreactive ramified microglia and a few monocytes/macrophages were in injured tissue within 1-3 days of SCI. Activated microglia, a few monocytes/macrophages and numerous phagocytic macrophages were present for weeks to months after SCI. A few CD8(+) lymphocytes were in the injured cords throughout the sampling intervals. Expression by the inflammatory cells of the oxidative enzymes myeloperoxidase (MPO) and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase (gp91(phox)), and of the pro-inflammatory matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9, was analysed to determine their potential to cause oxidative and proteolytic damage. Oxidative activity, inferred from MPO and gp91(phox) immunoreactivity, was primarily associated with neutrophils and activated microglia. Phagocytic macrophages had weak or no expression of MPO or gp91(phox). Only neutrophils expressed MMP-9. These data indicate that potentially destructive neutrophils and activated microglia, replete with oxidative and proteolytic enzymes, appear within the first few days of SCI, suggesting that anti-inflammatory 'neuroprotective' strategies should be directed at preventing early neutrophil influx and modifying microglial activation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Phagocytic microglia and infiltrating macrophage proliferation increases 6-fold within the first week of injury compared to uninjured controls.
“Similarly, phagocytic microglia and infiltrating macrophage proliferation increases 6-fold within the first week of injury compared to uninjured controls [2, 4, 76].”
From Delayed short-term tamoxifen treatment does not promote remyelination or neuron sparing after spinal cord injury (2020) · cites this paper as [2]
The quantitative-analysis section reports an almost sixfold increase at 1–3 days after injury compared with uninjured controls, but the measure was the area of CD68 immunoreactivity, not cell proliferation. The activation-and-infiltration section reports increased activated microglia at that time and only small numbers of infiltrating monocytes; it does not establish a sixfold increase in both cell populations. Page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThis significant increase in macrophage/microglia and NG2 cell proliferation is maintained for months post-injury.
“This significant increase in macrophage/microglia and NG2 cell proliferation is maintained for months post-injury [2, 44]; therefore, it is not surprising that our data reveal ~25% of the NG2+ cells and CD68+ cells are EdU+ at 42pi.”
From Delayed short-term tamoxifen treatment does not promote remyelination or neuron sparing after spinal cord injury (2020) · cites this paper as [2]
The quantitative analysis and time-course section reports significantly greater CD68-immunoreactive microglia/macrophage area weeks to months after spinal cord injury. That measures cell presence and staining, not sustained proliferation; the passages do not address NG2-cell proliferation (searched: NG2, proliferation, and cell-division markers). (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredImmediately after injury the spinal cord undergoes massive cellular and molecular changes, including increased cell death, infiltration of inflammation cells, axon degeneration, and OL and myelin loss.
“Immediately after injury the spinal cord undergoes massive cellular and molecular changes, including increased cell death [64, 65], infiltration of inflammation cells in the lesion [2–6], axon degeneration [7–10], and OL and myelin loss [13–16, 66, 67].”
From Delayed short-term tamoxifen treatment does not promote remyelination or neuron sparing after spinal cord injury (2020) · cites this paper as [2]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 56
- Agerberth B, Charo J, Werr J, Olsson B, Idali F, Lindbom L, et al. The human antimicrobial and chemotactic peptides LL-37 and alpha-defensins are expressed by specific lymphocyte and monocyte populations. Blood 2000; 96: 3086-93.
- Bao F, Chen Y, Dekaban GA, Weaver LC. Early anti-inflammatory treatment reduces lipid peroxidation and protein nitration after spinal cord injury in rats. J Neurochem 2004; 88: 1335-44.
- Bao F, Dekaban GA, Weaver LC. Anti-CD11d antibody treatment reduces free radical formation and cell death in the injured spinal cord of rats. J Neurochem 2005; 94: 1361-73.
- Barnathan ES, Raghunath PN, Tomaszewski JE, Ganz T, Cines DB, Higazi A al-R. Immunohistochemical localization of defensin in human coronary vessels. Am J Pathol 1997; 150: 1009-20.
- Bethea JR. Spinal cord injury-induced inflammation: a dual-edged sword. Prog Brain Res 2000; 128: 33-42.
- Blight AR. Delayed demyelination, macrophage invasion: a candidate for ''secondary'' cell damage in spinal cord injury. Cent Nerv Syst Trauma 1985; 2: 299-315.
- Brandes RP, Kreuzer J. Vascular NADPH oxidases: molecular mechanisms of activation. Cardiovasc Res 2005; 65: 16-27.
- Bunge RP, Puckett WR, Becerra JL, Marcillo A, Quencer RM. Observation on the pathology of human spinal cord injury. A review and classification of 22 new cases with details from a case of chronic cord compression with extensive focal demyelination. In: Seil FJ, editor. Advances in Neurology. New York: Raven Press Ltd.; 1993. p. 75-89.
- Carlson SL, Parrish ME, Springer JE, Doty K, Dossett L. Acute inflammatory response in spinal cord following impact injury. Exp Neurol 1998; 151: 77-81.
- Chang HT. Subacute human spinal cord contusion: few lymphocytes and many macrophages. Spinal Cord 2006. Advanced online publication, 28 February 2006; doi:10.1038/si.sc.3101910. · DOI
- Chatzipanteli K, Yanagawa Y, Marcillo AE, Kraydieh S, Yezierski RP, Dietrich WD. Posttraumatic hypothermia reduces polymorphonuclear leukocyte accumulation following spinal cord injury in rats. J Neurotrauma 2000; 17: 321-32.
- Crutcher KA, Gendelman HE, Kipnis J, Regino Perez-Polo J, Perry VH, Popovich PG, Weaver LC. Debate: ''is increasing neuroinflammation beneficial for neural repair?'' J Neuroimmune Pharm 2006; 1: 195-211.
- Dougherty KD, Dreyfus CF, Black IB. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor in astrocytes, oligodendrocytes and microglia/macrophages after spinal cord injury. Neurobiol Dis 2000; 7: 574-85.
- Duchossoy Y, Horvat JC, Stettler O. MMP-related gelatinase activity is strongly induced in scar tissue of injured adult spinal cord, forms pathways for ingrowing neurites. Mol Cell Neurosci 2001; 17: 945-56.
- Farooque M, Isaksson J, Olsson Y. Improved recovery after spinal cord trauma in ICAM-1 and P-selectin knockout mice. Neuroreport 1999; 10: 131-4.
- Friese MA, Fugger L. Autoreactive CD8+ T cells in multiple sclerosis: a new target for therapy? Brain 2005; 128: 1747-63.
- Gonzalez R, Glaser J, Liu MT, Lane TE, Keirstead HS. Reducing inflammation decreases secondary degeneration and functional deficit after spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol 2003; 184: 456-63.
- Greaves DR, Quinn CM, Seldin MF, Gordon S. Functional comparison of the murine macrosialin and human CD68 promoters in macrophage and nonmacrophage cell lines. Genomics 1998; 54: 165-8.
- Gris D, Marsh DR, Oatway MA, Chen Y, Hamilton EF, Dekaban GA, et al. Transient blockade of the CD11d/CD18 integrin reduces secondary damage after spinal cord injury, improving sensory, autonomic, and motor function. J Neurosci 2004; 24: 4043-51.
- Hall ED. The neuroprotective pharmacology of methylprednisolone. J Neurology 1992; 76: 13-22.
- Hauben E, Schwartz M. Therapeutic vaccination for spinal cord injury: helping the body to cure itself. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2003; 24: 7-12.
- Hauben E, Butovsky O, Nevo U, Yoles E, Moalem G, Agranov E, et al. Passive or active immunization with myelin basic protein promotes recovery from spinal cord contusion. J Neurosci 2000; 20: 6421-30.
- Hausmann ON. Post-traumatic inflammation following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2003; 41: 369-78.
- Ito T, Oyanagi K, Wakabayashi K, Ikuta F. Traumatic spinal cord injury: a neuropathological study on the longitudinal spreading of the lesions. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1997; 93: 13-8.
- Jones TB, Ankeny DP, Guan Z, McGaughy VM, Fisher L, Basso DM, et al. Passive or active immunization with myelin basic protein impairs neurological function and exacerbates neuropathology after spinal cord injury in rats. J Neurosci 2004; 24: 3752-61.
- Jones TB, Hart RP, Popovich PG. Molecular control of physiological and pathological T-cell recruitment after mouse spinal cord injury. J Neurosci 2005; 25: 6576-83.
- Kigerl KA, McGaughy VM, Popovich PG. Comparative analysis of lesion development and intraspinal inflammation in four strains of mice following spinal contusion injury. J Comp Neurol 2006; 494: 578-94.
- Kim MJ, Shin KS, Chung YB, Jung KW, Cha CI, Shin DH. Immunohis- tochemical study of p47Phox and gp91Phox distributions in rat brain. Brain Res 2005; 1040: 178-86.
- Kwon BK, Tetzlaff W, Grauer JN, Beiner J, Vaccaro AR. Pathophysiology and pharmacologic treatment of acute spinal cord injury. Spine J 2004; 4: 451-64.
- Mun-Bryce S, Rosenberg GA, Gelatinase B. modulates selective opening of the blood-brain barrier during inflammation. Am J Physiol 1998; 274: 1203-11.
- Noble LJ, Donovan F, Igarashi T, Goussev S, Werb Z. Matrix metallopro- teinases limit functional recovery after spinal cord injury by modulation of early vascular events. J Neurosci 2002; 22: 7526-35.
- Norenberg MD, Smith J, Marcillo A. The pathology of human spinal cord injury: defining the problems. J Neurotrauma 2004; 21: 429-40.
- Popovich PG, Wei P, Stokes BT. Cellular inflammatory response after spinal cord injury in Sprague-Dawley and Lewis rats. J Comp Neurol 1997; 377: 443-64.
- Popovich PG, Guan Z, Wei P, Huitinga I, van RN, Stokes BT. Depletion of hematogenous macrophages promotes partial hindlimb recovery and neuroanatomical repair after experimental spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol 1999; 158: 351-65.
- Popovich PG, Guan Z, McGaughy V, Fisher L, Hickey WF, Basso DM. The neuropathological, behavioral consequences of intraspinal microglial/macrophage activation. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2002; 61: 623-33.
- Rabchevsky AG, Streit WJ. Role of microglia in postinjury repair and regeneration of the CNS. MRDD Res Rev 1998; 4: 187-92.
- Ross JA, Auger MJ. The biology of the macrophage. In: Burke BLCE, editor. The macrophage. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002. p. 3-72.
- Saville LR, Pospisil CH, Mawhinney LA, Bao F, Simedria FC, Peters AA, et al. A monoclonal antibody to CD11d reduces the inflammatory infiltrate into the injured spinal cord: a potential neuroprotective treatment. J Neuroimmunol 2004; 156: 42-57.
- Schluesener H, Meyermann R. Neutrophilic defensins penetrate the blood-brain barrier. J Neurosci Res 1995; 42: 718-23.
- Schmitt AB, Buss A, Breuer S, Brook GA, Pech K, Martin D, et al. Major histocompatibility complex class II expression by activated microglia caudal to lesions of descending tracts in the human spinal cord is not associated with a T cell response. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 2000; 100: 528-36.
- Schnell L, Fearn S, Klassen H, Schwab ME, Perry VH. Acute inflammatory responses to mechanical lesions in the CNS: differences between brain and spinal cord. Eur J Neurosci 1999; 11: 3648-58.
- Schwartz M. Macrophages and microglia in central nervous system injury: are they helpful or harmful? J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2003; 23: 385-94.
- Shkrum MJ, Ramsay DA. Craniocerebral trauma and vertebrospinal trauma. In: Shkrum MJ, Ramsay DA, editors. Forensic pathology of trauma: common problems for the pathologist. Clifton, NJ : Humana Press; 2006. p. 581-4.
- Snedecor G, Cochran WG. Statistical methods. Iowa: Iowa State University Press; 1989.
- Sroga JM, Jones TB, Kigerl KA, McGaughy VM, Popovich PG. Rats and mice exhibit distinct inflammatory reactions after spinal cord injury. J Comp Neurol 2003; 462: 223-40.
- Taoka Y, Okajima K, Uchiba M, Murakami K, Kushimoto S, Johno M, et al. Role of neutrophils in spinal cord injury in the rat. Neurosci 1997; 79: 1177-82.
- Taoka Y, Okajima K, Murakami K, Johno M, Naruo M. Role of neutrophil elastase in compression-induced spinal injury in rats. Brain Res 1998; 799: 264-9.
- Tator CH, Fehlings MG. Review of the secondary injury theory of acute spinal cord trauma with emphasis on vascular mechanisms. J Neurosurg 1991; 75: 15-26.
- van den Berg TK, Dopp EA, Dijkstra CD. Rat macrophages: membrane glycoproteins in differentiation and function. Immunol Rev 2001; 184: 45-57.
- Vaziri ND, Lee YS, Lin CY, Lin VW, Sindhu RK. NAD(P)H oxidase, superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase and nitric oxide synthase expression in subacute spinal cord injury. Brain Res 2004; 995: 76-83.
- Wang X, Jung J, Asahi M, Chwang W, Russo L, Moskowitz MA, et al. Effects of matrix metalloproteinase-9 gene knock-out on morphological and motor outcomes after traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci 2000; 20: 7037-42.
- Whyte MK, Meagher LC, MacDermot J, Haslett C. Impairment of function in aging neutrophils is associated with apoptosis. J Immunol 1993; 150: 5124-34.
- Yang L, Blumbergs PC, Jones NR, Manavis J, Sarvestani GT, Ghabriel MN. Early expression and cellular localization of proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-1Beta, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in human traumatic spinal cord injury. Spine 2004; 29: 966-71.
- Yin Y, Cui Q, Li Y, Irwin N, Fischer D, Harvey AR, et al. Macrophage-derived factors stimulate optic nerve regeneration. J Neurosci 2003; 23: 2284-93.
- Yin Y, Henzl MT, Lorber B, Nakazawa T, Thomas TT, Jiang F, et al. Oncomodulin is a macrophage-derived signal for axon regeneration in retinal ganglion cells. Nat Neurosci 2006; 9: 843-52.
- Young W. Secondary injury mechanisms in acute spinal cord injury. J Emerg Med 1993; 11: 13-22.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kigerl, K. A., Gensel, J. C., Ankeny, D. P., Alexander, J. K., Donnelly, D. J., & Popovich, P. G. (2009) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3257-09.2009 · Cited by 2,130 · see citing works
Neuroinflammation and M2 Microglia: The Good, the Bad, and the Inflamed
Cherry, J. D., Olschowka, J. A., & O’Banion, M. K. (2014) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/1742-2094-11-98 · Cited by 1,748 · see citing works
Neuroinflammation: The Devil Is in the Details
DiSabato, D. J., Quan, N., & Godbout, J. P. (2016) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/jnc.13607 · Cited by 1,640 · see citing works
Inflammation and white matter degeneration persist for years after a single traumatic brain injury
Johnson, V. E., Stewart, J. E., Begbie, F. D., Trojanowski, J. Q., Smith, D. H., & Stewart, W. (2013) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/aws322 · Cited by 1,045 · see citing works
Spinal cord repair: advances in biology and technology
Courtine, G., & Sofroniew, M. V. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0475-6 · Cited by 508 · see citing works
Jiang, D., Gong, F., Ge, X., Lv, C., Huang, C., Feng, S., Zhou, Z., Rong, Y., Wang, J., Ji, C., et al. (2020) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-020-00665-8 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Schwab, J. M., Zhang, Y., Kopp, M. A., Brommer, B., & Popovich, P. G. (2014) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.04.023 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
“Injury to the spinal cord elicits a robust intraspinal inflammatory response (Fleming et al., 2006; Popovich et al., 1996a,b; Rice et al., 2007; Schwab et al., 2001).”
BackgroundInfluentialAging and Neurodegenerative Disease: Is the Adaptive Immune System a Friend or Foe?
Mayne, K., White, J. A., McMurran, C. E., Rivera, F. J., & de la Fuente, A. G. (2020) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2020.572090 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Prolonged Microgliosis in the Rhesus Monkey Central Nervous System after Traumatic Brain Injury
Nagamoto-Combs, K., McNeal, D. W., Morecraft, R. J., & Combs, C. K. (2007) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2007.0377 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Stefanova, N., Georgievska, B., Eriksson, H., Poewe, W., & Wenning, G. K. (2012) · Neurotoxicity Research · doi:10.1007/s12640-011-9294-3 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Yu, W. R., & Fehlings, M. G. (2011) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-011-0882-3 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
A perspective on the role of class III semaphorin signaling in central nervous system trauma
Mecollari, V., Nieuwenhuis, B., & Verhaagen, J. (2014) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2014.00328 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Targeting senescent cells improves functional recovery after spinal cord injury
Paramos-de-Carvalho, D., Martins, I., Cristóvão, A. M., Dias, A. F., Neves-Silva, D., Pereira, T., Chapela, D., Farinho, A., Jacinto, A., & Saúde, L. (2021) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109334 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Monteiro, S., Pinho, A. G., Macieira, M., Serre-Miranda, C., Cibrão, J. R., Lima, R., Soares-Cunha, C., Vasconcelos, N. L., Lentilhas-Graça, J., Duarte-Silva, S., et al. (2020) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-020-01945-8 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Pericyte-derived fibrotic scarring is conserved across diverse central nervous system lesions.
Dias, D. O., Kalkitsas, J., Kelahmetoglu, Y., Estrada, C. P., Tatarishvili, J., Ernst, A., Huttner, H. B., Kokaia, Z., Lindvall, O., Brundin, L., et al. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.04.30.068965
Pukos, N., & McTigue, D. M. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0235232 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fleming, J. C., Norenberg, M. D., Ramsay, D. A., Dekaban, G. A., Marcillo, A. E., Saenz, A. D., Pasquale-Styles, M., Dietrich, W. D., & Weaver, L. C.
- Affiliations
- Western University (CA)
- University of Miami (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fleming, J. C.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-06-09
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3249-3269
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W1988868629
- Cited by
- 847
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 53
- FWCI
- 17.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Brain (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- London Health Sciences Centre
- Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation
- National Institutes of Health
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P01NS38665, N01NS32351, P01NS038665)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Keywords
- spinal cord injury, secondary injury, inflammation, neutrophils, microglial activation, macrophages, CD8+ T cells, myeloperoxidase, NADPH oxidase, MMP-9, oxidative stress, Wallerian degeneration, cystic cavities, time course of injury, anti-inflammatory therapy
- MeSH terms
- NADPH Oxidase 2, CD68 Molecule, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Lymphocytes, Macrophages, Male, Membrane Glycoproteins, Middle Aged, Monocytes, Peroxidase, Necrosis, Neutrophils, Oxidation-Reduction, Spinal Cord, Spinal Cord Injuries, Time Factors, Antigens, Differentiation, Myelomonocytic, Biomarkers, Antigens, CD, Microglia, NADPH Oxidases, Matrix Metalloproteinase 9
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review