Cited by 269Action Observation and SynchronizationNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismFace Recognition and Perception

Critical brain regions for action recognition: lesion symptom mapping in left hemisphere stroke

Open access
Kalénine, Solène, Buxbaum, Laurel J., Coslett, Harry Branch·2010·Brain

Abstract

A number of conflicting claims have been advanced regarding the role of the left inferior frontal gyrus, inferior parietal lobe and posterior middle temporal gyrus in action recognition, driven in part by an ongoing debate about the capacities of putative mirror systems that match observed and planned actions. We report data from 43 left hemisphere stroke patients in two action recognition tasks in which they heard and saw an action word ('hammering') and selected from two videoclips the one corresponding to the word. In the spatial recognition task, foils contained errors of body posture or movement amplitude/timing. In the semantic recognition task, foils were semantically related (sawing). Participants also performed a comprehension control task requiring matching of the same verbs to objects (hammer). Using regression analyses controlling for both the comprehension control task and lesion volume, we demonstrated that performance in the semantic gesture recognition task was predicted by per cent damage to the posterior temporal lobe, whereas the spatial gesture recognition task was predicted by per cent damage to the inferior parietal lobule. A whole-brain voxel-based lesion symptom-mapping analysis suggested that the semantic and spatial gesture recognition tasks were associated with lesioned voxels in the posterior middle temporal gyrus and inferior parietal lobule, respectively. The posterior middle temporal gyrus appears to serve as a central node in the association of actions and meanings. The inferior parietal lobule, held to be a homologue of the monkey parietal mirror neuron system, is critical for encoding object-related postures and movements, a relatively circumscribed aspect of gesture recognition. The inferior frontal gyrus, on the other hand, was not predictive of performance in any task, suggesting that previous claims regarding its role in action recognition may require refinement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awq210

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patient data indicate that components of action perception - including action detection, discrimination between observed actions, action recognition, and object-action matching - may require classical MN areas.

    “Patient data indicate that components of action perception - including action detection, discrimination between observed actions, action recognition (e.g. naming observed actions), and object-action matching - may require classical MN areas”

    From Mirror neurons: from origin to function (2014) · cites this paper as Kalenine, Buxbaum, & Coslett, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kalénine, S., Buxbaum, L. J., & Coslett, H. B.
Affiliations
  • Moss Rehabilitation Hospital (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Brain
Published
2010-08-28
Volume
133
Issue
11
Pages
3269-3280
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2095276182
Cited by
269
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 17
FWCI
23.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS036387)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD050836)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
human action recognition, gesture recognition, left hemisphere stroke, lesion-symptom mapping, inferior parietal lobule, posterior middle temporal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, mirror system, posterior temporal lobe
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Aged, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Stroke, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review