Cited by 329Action Observation and SynchronizationNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismMotor Control and Adaptation

On beyond mirror neurons: Internal representations subserving imitation and recognition of skilled object-related actions in humans

Buxbaum, Laurel J., Kyle, Kathleen M., Menon, Rukmini·2005·Cognitive Brain Research

Abstract

A considerable recent literature argues that the same representations, encoded by inferior prefrontal and parietal cells known as "mirror neurons", may be activated in both production and recognition of object-related actions. Here, we test several predictions derived from the contemporary literature on the parity between production and recognition and the putative emergence of the mirror neuron system from a system coding hand-object interactions. Forty-four patients with left-hemisphere stroke, 21 of whom exhibited ideomotor apraxia, performed a number of pantomime imitation and recognition tasks, and performance was scored with respect to hand posture, arm posture, amplitude, and timing. Consistent with predictions, there were strong relationships between object-related pantomime imitation and object-related pantomime recognition, and between imitation and recognition of the hand posture component of object-related actions. Skilled object-related gesture representations are likely to be closely tied to evolutionarily more primitive systems controlling object grasping, to emerge from a mapping between object and action information coded by ventral and dorsal streams, and to be lateralized to the left hemisphere in humans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.05.014

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patient data indicate that components of action perception - including action detection, discrimination between observed actions, action recognition, and object-action matching - may require classical MN areas.

    “Patient data indicate that components of action perception - including action detection, discrimination between observed actions, action recognition (e.g. naming observed actions), and object-action matching - may require classical MN areas”

    From Mirror neurons: from origin to function (2014) · cites this paper as Buxbaum, Kyle, & Menon, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buxbaum, L. J., Kyle, K. M., & Menon, R.
Affiliations
  • Thomas Jefferson University (US)
  • Moss Rehabilitation Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Buxbaum, Laurel J.
Venue
Cognitive Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-09
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
226-239
ISSN
0926-6410 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021596040
Cited by
329
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 13
FWCI
22.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pennsylvania Department of Health
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS036387, R01NS36387)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
mirror neurons, imitation, human action recognition, pantomime, ideomotor apraxia, stroke, hemispheric lateralization, hand-object interaction, left hemisphere
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Choice Behavior, Disability Evaluation, Female, Gestures, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Psychomotor Performance, Space Perception, Case-Control Studies, Apraxia, Ideomotor, Stroke, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review