Cited by 226Action Observation and SynchronizationNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

What is the role of motor simulation in action and object recognition? Evidence from apraxia

Negri, Gioia A. L., Rumiati, Raffaella I., Zadini, Antonietta, Ukmar, Maja, Mahon, Bradford Z., Caramazza, Alfonso·2007·Cognitive Neuropsychology

Abstract

An important issue in contemporary cognitive neuroscience concerns the role of motor production processes in perceptual and conceptual analysis. To address this issue, we studied the performance of a large group of unilateral stroke patients across a range of tasks using the same set of common manipulable objects. All patients (n = 37) were tested for their ability to demonstrate the use of the objects, recognize the objects, recognize the corresponding object-associated pantomimes, and imitate those same pantomimes. At the group level we observed reliable correlations between object use and pantomime recognition, object use and object recognition, and pantomime imitation and pantomime recognition. At the single-case level, we document that the ability to recognize actions and objects dissociates from the ability to use those same objects. These data are problematic for the hypothesis that motor processes are constitutively involved in the recognition of actions and objects and frame new questions about the inferences that are merited by recent findings in cognitive neuroscience.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02643290701707412

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Not all patients with impairments in action production are also impaired in action recognition, suggesting that motor ability may not always predict this aspect of 'action understanding'.

    “not all patients with impairments in action production are also impaired in action recognition, suggesting that motor ability may not always predict this aspect of 'action understanding'”

    From Mirror neurons: from origin to function (2014) · cites this paper as Negri et al., 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Negri, G. A. L., Rumiati, R. I., Zadini, A., Ukmar, M., Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A.
Affiliations
  • Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (IT)
  • Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste (IT)
  • University of Trieste (IT)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Negri, Gioia A. L.
Venue
Cognitive Neuropsychology
Published
2007-12
Volume
24
Issue
8
Pages
795-816
ISSN
  • 0264-3294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0627
OpenAlex
W2107226456
Cited by
226
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 13
FWCI
12.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SDL (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC 04542, R01DC004542)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
motor simulation, human action recognition, object recognition, apraxia, stroke, object use
MeSH terms
Aged, Anomia, Apraxias, Brain, Brain Damage, Chronic, Concept Formation, Dominance, Cerebral, Female, Humans, Imagination, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychometrics, Psychomotor Performance, Tomography, X-Ray Computed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review