Cited by 175Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Reconstruction of single cortical projection neurons reveals primary spine loss in multiple sclerosis

Open access
Jürgens, Tanja, Jafari, Mehrnoosh, Kreutzfeldt, Mario, Bahn, Erik, Brück, Wolfgang, Kerschensteiner, Martin, Merkler, Doron·2016·Brain

Abstract

See Friese (doi: 10.1093/brain/awv349 ) for a scientific commentary on this article. Grey matter pathology has emerged as an important contributor to long-term disability in multiple sclerosis. To better understand where and how neuronal damage in the grey matter is initiated, we used high resolution confocal microscopy of Golgi-Cox impregnated tissue sections and reconstructed single cortical projection neurons in autopsies from eight patients with long-standing relapsing-remitting or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis and eight control patients without neurological disease. Analysis of several hundred individual neurons located in the insular, frontotemporal and occipital lobe revealed a widespread and pronounced loss of dendritic spines in multiple sclerosis cortex that occurs independent of cortical demyelination and axon loss. The presence of a primary synaptic pathology in the normal-appearing cortex of multiple sclerosis patients challenges current disease concepts and has important implications for our understanding of disease progression. See Friese (doi: 10.1093/brain/awv349 ) for a scientific commentary on this article. Neuronal pathology contributes to long-term disability in multiple sclerosis, but where and how this damage is initiated is unclear. Jürgens et al. use high-resolution confocal microscopy to reconstruct single cortical neurons in patients with multiple sclerosis and controls. Results reveal a primary lesion-independent synaptic pathology that challenges current disease concepts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awv353

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neurite morphology is affected by multiple sclerosis.

    “Our study tests the hypothesis that the variability of neurite orientations is a biomarker of multiple sclerosis pathology, and is motivated by recent findings demonstrating that neurite morphology is a substrate of neural function23, 24 and is affected by multiple sclerosis.25”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jürgens, T., Jafari, M., Kreutzfeldt, M., Bahn, E., Brück, W., Kerschensteiner, M., & Merkler, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • Institut für Klinische Neuroimmunologie (DE)
  • Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
  • Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (DE)
Venue
Brain
Published
2015-12-14
Volume
139
Issue
1
Pages
39-46
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2199486318
Cited by
175
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1
FWCI
11.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion)
  • RERO DOC (Universität Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • GRO (submittedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Multiple Sclerosis Society
  • European Commission (2007–2013)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EXC 1010)
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (152928)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
  • Schweizerische Multiple Sklerose Gesellschaft
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (310932)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, dendritic spine loss, cortical projection neurons, synaptic pathology, gray matter pathology, neuronal injury, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, long-term disability, single-neuron reconstruction
MeSH terms
Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Neurons, Case-Control Studies, Dendritic Spines, Gray Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review