Cited by 52Phytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressFood and Agricultural Sciences

Influence of fruit and vegetable juices on the endogenous formation of N-nitrosoproline and N-nitrosothiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid in humans on controlled diets

Helser, M.A., Hotchkiss, J.H., Roe, D.A.·1992·Carcinogenesis

Abstract

Water, green pepper, pineapple, tomato, strawberry, carrot, and celery juices were made 46 mg/100 ml in ascorbic acid by the addition of distilled water or ascorbate. The ability of each juice to inhibit endogenous formation of N-nitrosoamino acids (NAA) in humans was determined in controlled experiments. Sixteen men consumed a standard diet low in nitrate and ascorbic acid for 18 consecutive days. Nitrate (5.24 mmol) and L-proline (4.35 mmol) were given orally on days 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17 and 18. On days 3 and 18, L-proline was immediately followed by 100 ml distilled water (positive control). On days 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15 and 17, L-proline was immediately followed by 100 ml juice or 46 mg ascorbate in 100 ml distilled water (treatment). Only diet was given in between dosing days to ensure baseline levels of NAA excretion. Urine was collected for 24 h following treatments and analyzed for NAA. Green pepper, pineapple, tomato, strawberry and carrot treatments significantly inhibited N-nitrosoproline (NPRO) formation relative to the positive control. Also, green pepper, pineapple and tomato juices significantly inhibited NPRO formation relative to ascorbic acid alone. Green pepper significantly inhibited N-nitrosothiazolidine-carboxylic acid formation relative to ascorbic acid alone. These data demonstrate that green pepper, tomato, pineapple, strawberry and carrot juice have greater ability to inhibit endogenous nitrosation than would be expected based solely on their ascorbate content.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/carcin/13.12.2277

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Helser, M. A., Hotchkiss, J. H., & Roe, D. A.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Venue
Carcinogenesis
Published
1992
Volume
13
Issue
12
Pages
2277-2280
ISSN
  • 0143-3334 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2180
OpenAlex
W2046250076
Cited by
52
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Carcinogenesis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
Keywords
fruit and vegetable juices, N-nitrosoproline, endogenous nitrosation, proline, vitamin C, tomato juice, pineapple juice, strawberry juice, carrot juice, celery juice, nitrate, urinary excretion
MeSH terms
Adult, Beverages, Diet, Fruit, Humans, Male, Nitrosamines, Nitroso Compounds, Thiazoles, Vegetables, Thiazolidines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review