Cited by 169Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain functionMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Horizontal synaptic connections in monkey prefrontal cortex: An in vitro electrophysiological study

Gonzalez-Burgos, G.·2000·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

In monkey dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC), long-distance, horizontally oriented intrinsic axon collaterals interconnect clusters of pyramidal neurons in the supragranular layers. In order to study the electrophysiological responses mediated by these long-distance projections, an in vitro slice preparation of monkey PFC was used to obtain whole-cell patch clamp recordings from layer 3 pyramidal neurons. Using in vivo tracer injections, we found that long-distance projections were well preserved in PFC slices cut in the coronal plane. Postsynaptic currents were evoked by low-intensity electrical extracellular stimulation applied successively to 20-30 discrete sites located up to 2200 micron lateral to the recorded cell. Several criteria were applied to discriminate between mono- and polysynaptic responses. Long-distance monosynaptic connections were mediated by fibers with relatively slow conduction velocity (0.14 m/s). Excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) evoked by stimulation of short- or long-distance horizontal connections did not differ in kinetic properties. The majority (77%) of the 35 layer 3 PFC neurons studied were monosynaptic targets of long-distance connections. EPSCs mediated by long-distance connections had amplitudes that were similar or even larger than short-distance EPSCs, suggesting that excitatory input provided by the former was relatively robust. For most neurons (87.5%) in which a full complement of monosynaptic EPSCs was evoked by multisite sti…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/10.1.82

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gonzalez-Burgos, G.
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2000-01-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
82-92
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2160931640
Cited by
169
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH-00519, MH-51234, MH 45156, R01MH051234, P50MH045156)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, axon collaterals, monosynaptic connections, polysynaptic connections, excitatory postsynaptic currents, conduction velocity, intrinsic functional connectivity
MeSH terms
Animals, Electric Stimulation, Electrophysiology, Macaca fascicularis, Male, Neural Pathways, Synapses, Prefrontal Cortex, Pyramidal Cells, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review