The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New Evidence for Distinct Right and Left Brain Systems for Deductive versus Probabilistic Reasoning
Abstract
Deductive and probabilistic reasoning are central to cognition but the functional neuroanatomy underlying them is poorly understood. The present study contrasted these two kinds of reasoning via positron emission tomography. Relying on changes in instruction and psychological 'set', deductive versus probabilistic reasoning was induced using identical stimuli. The stimuli were arguments in propositional calculus not readily solved via mental diagrams. Probabilistic reasoning activated mostly left brain areas whereas deductive activated mostly right. Deduction activated areas near right brain homologues of left language areas in middle temporal lobe, inferior frontal cortex and basal ganglia, as well as right amygdala, but not spatial-visual areas. Right hemisphere activations in the deduction task cannot be explained by spill-over from overtaxed, left language areas. Probabilistic reasoning was mostly associated with left hemispheric areas in inferior frontal, posterior cingulate, parahippocampal, medial temporal, and superior and medial prefrontal cortices. The foregoing regions are implicated in recalling and evaluating a range of world knowledge, operations required during probabilistic thought. The findings confirm that deduction and induction are distinct processes, consistent with psychological theories enforcing their partial separation. The results also suggest that, except for statement decoding, deduction is largely independent of language, and that some forms of logical thinking are non-diagrammatic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory
Paulesu, E., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/362342a0 · Cited by 2,230
Image And Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate
Kosslyn, S. M. (1994) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3653.001.0001 · Cited by 1,977
A Suggestion for Using Powerful and Informative Tests of Normality
D'agostino, R. B., Belanger, A., & D'agostino, R. B. (1990) · The American Statistician · doi:10.2307/2684359 · Cited by 1,809
Anatomical evidence for cerebellar and basal ganglia involvement in higher cognitive function
Middleton, F. A., & Strick, P. L. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7939688 · Cited by 1,356
Cosmides, L. (1996) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(95)00664-8 · Cited by 1,293
Gur, R. C., Turetsky, B. I., Matsui, M., Yan, M., Bilker, W., Hughett, P., & Gur, R. E. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-10-04065.1999 · Cited by 909
Everitt, B. J., Cador, M., & Robbins, T. W. (1989) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(89)90353-9 · Cited by 444
Regional cerebral blood flow during object naming and word reading
Bookheimer, S. Y., Zeffiro, T. A., Blaxton, T., Gaillard, W., & Theodore, W. (1995) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460030206 · Cited by 410
Cortical speech processing mechanisms while vocalizing visually presented languages
Hirano, S., Kojima, H., Naito, Y., Honjo, I., Kamoto, Y., Okazawa, H., Ishizu, K., Yonekura, Y., Nagahama, Y., Fukuyama, H., et al. (1996) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-199612200-00071 · Cited by 57
Cited by
(2013) · Cited by 1,351
Passive music listening spontaneously engages limbic and paralimbic systems
Brown, S., Martinez, M. J., & Parsons, L. M. (2004) · NeuroReport · doi:10.1097/00001756-200409150-00008 · Cited by 468
Self-citationAn evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning
Osman, M. (2004) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196730 · Cited by 444
Brown, S., Martinez, M. J., & Parsons, L. M. (2006) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04785.x · Cited by 371
Medical decision-making in children and adolescents: developmental and neuroscientific aspects
Grootens-Wiegers, P., Hein, I. M., van den Broek, J. M., & de Vries, M. C. (2017) · BMC Pediatrics · doi:10.1186/s12887-017-0869-x · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Parsons, L. M.
- Venue
- Cerebral Cortex
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-10-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 954-965
- ISSN
- 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2199
- OpenAlex
- W2043180686
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 4.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Evidence for Distinct Right and Left Brain Systems for Deductive versus Probabilistic Reasoning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cercor/11.10.954
- The paper
- Parsons, L. M. (2001). New Evidence for Distinct Right and Left Brain Systems for Deductive versus Probabilistic Reasoning. Cerebral Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/11.10.954
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.