Cited by 470Neuroscience and Music PerceptionAesthetic Perception and AnalysisMusic Therapy and Health

Passive music listening spontaneously engages limbic and paralimbic systems

Brown, Steven, Martinez, Michael J., Parsons, Lawrence M.·2004·NeuroReport

Abstract

In this PET study, non-musicians passively listened to unfamiliar instrumental music revealed afterward to elicit strongly pleasant feelings. Activations were observed in the subcallosal cingulate gyrus, prefrontal anterior cingulate, retrosplenial cortex, hippocampus, anterior insula, and nucleus accumbens. This is the first observation of spontaneous responses in such limbic and paralimbic areas during passive listening to unfamiliar although liked music. Activations were also seen in primary auditory, secondary auditory, and temporal polar areas known to respond to music. Our findings complement neuroimaging studies of aesthetic responses to music that have used stimuli selected by subjects or designed by experimenters. The observed pattern of activity is discussed in terms of a model synthesizing emotional and cognitive responses to music.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001756-200409150-00008

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Music listening prior to the experience of stress may add to, facilitate, or increase subsequent HPA axis activation by a staggered activation of a partly shared neuronal network.

    “It appears that music listening prior to the experience of stress may add to, facilitate, or increase subsequent HPA axis activation by a staggered activation of a partly shared neuronal network.”

    From The Effect of Music on the Human Stress Response (2013) · cites this paper as [80]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, S., Martinez, M. J., & Parsons, L. M.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Venue
NeuroReport
Published
2004-09
Volume
15
Issue
13
Pages
2033-2037
ISSN
0959-4965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098270502
Cited by
468
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 23
FWCI
6.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroreport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Music Therapy and Health
Keywords
passive music listening, music appreciation, limbic system, paralimbic system, emotional response to music, music aesthetics, anterior cingulate cortex, retrosplenial cortex, hippocampus, anterior insula, nucleus accumbens, auditory cortex, non-musicians, unfamiliar music
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Limbic System, Male, Middle Aged, Music, Temporal Lobe, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review