The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multisensory Interactions within Human Primary Cortices Revealed by BOLD Dynamics
Open accessAbstract
Whether signals from different sensory modalities converge and interact within primary cortices in humans is unresolved, despite emerging evidence in animals. This is partially because of debates concerning the appropriate analyses of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data in response to multisensory phenomena. Using event-related fMRI, we observed that simple auditory stimuli (noise bursts) activated primary visual cortices and that simple visual stimuli (checkerboards) activated primary auditory cortices, indicative of multisensory convergence. Moreover, analyses of blood oxygen level-dependent response dynamics revealed facilitation of hemodynamic response peak latencies and slopes for multisensory auditory-visual stimuli versus either unisensory condition, indicative of multisensory interactions within primary sensory cortices. Neural processing at the lowest cortical levels can be modulated by interactions between the senses. Temporal information in fMRI data can reveal these modulations and overcome analytic and interpretational challenges of more traditional procedures. In addition to providing an essential translational link with animal models, these results suggest that longstanding notions of cortical organization need to be revised to include multisensory interactions as an inherent component of functional brain organization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-4365 · Cited by 1,882
Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals
Miller, J. (1982) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(82)90010-x · Cited by 1,213
Giard, M. H., & Peronnet, F. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892999563544 · Cited by 1,072
Haxby, J., Horwitz, B., Ungerleider, L., Maisog, J., Pietrini, P., & Grady, C. (1994) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.14-11-06336.1994 · Cited by 1,068
The Underpinnings of the BOLD Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signal
Logothetis, N. K. (2003) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-10-03963.2003 · Cited by 1,039
Crossmodal Processing in the Human Brain: Insights from Functional Neuroimaging Studies
Calvert, G. A. (2001) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/11.12.1110 · Cited by 1,012
Molholm, S., Ritter, W., Murray, M. M., Javitt, D. C., Schroeder, C. E., & Foxe, J. J. (2002) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00066-6 · Cited by 902
Self-citationAnatomical evidence of multimodal integration in primate striate cortex
Falchier, A., Clavagnier, S., Barone, P., & Kennedy, H. (2002) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-13-05749.2002 · Cited by 892 · cited 2×
“Multisensory Interactions within Human”
MethodJosephs, O., Turner, R., & Friston, K. (1997) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(1997)5:4<243::aid-hbm7>3.0.co;2-3 · Cited by 694
DIVISION OF PSYCHOLOGY : STATISTICAL FACILITATION OF SIMPLE REACTION TIMES*
Raab, D. H. (1962) · Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.2164-0947.1962.tb01433.x · Cited by 668
Cited by
Benefits of multisensory learning
Shams, L., & Seitz, A. R. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.006 · Cited by 1,178
Driver, J., & Noesselt, T. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.12.013 · Cited by 940
Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Cortical Sensorimotor Integration in Behaving Mice
Ferezou, I., Haiss, F., Gentet, L. J., Aronoff, R., Weber, B., & Petersen, C. C. H. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.007 · Cited by 697
Baum, S. H., Stevenson, R. A., & Wallace, M. T. (2015) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.09.007 · Cited by 370
Decoding sound and imagery content in early visual cortex
Vetter, P., Smith, F. W., & Muckli, L. (2014) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.04.020 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Martuzzi, R., Murray, M. M., Michel, C. M., Thiran, J.-P., Maeder, P. P., Clarke, S., & Meuli, R. A.
- Venue
- Cerebral Cortex
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-09-12
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1672-1679
- ISSN
- 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2199
- OpenAlex
- W2147675386
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 21.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multisensory Interactions within Human Primary Cortices Revealed by BOLD Dynamics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cercor/bhl077
- The paper
- Martuzzi, R., Murray, M. M., Michel, C. M., Thiran, J.-P., Maeder, P. P., Clarke, S., & Meuli, R. A. (2007). Multisensory Interactions within Human Primary Cortices Revealed by BOLD Dynamics. Cerebral Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhl077
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.