Cited by 4,060Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismMemory Processes and InfluencesReading and Literacy Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 439 of the 439 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Where Is the Semantic System? A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of 120 Functional Neuroimaging Studies

Open access

Abstract

Semantic memory refers to knowledge about people, objects, actions, relations, self, and culture acquired through experience. The neural systems that store and retrieve this information have been studied for many years, but a consensus regarding their identity has not been reached. Using strict inclusion criteria, we analyzed 120 functional neuroimaging studies focusing on semantic processing. Reliable areas of activation in these studies were identified using the activation likelihood estimate (ALE) technique. These activations formed a distinct, left-lateralized network comprised of 7 regions: posterior inferior parietal lobe, middle temporal gyrus, fusiform and parahippocampal gyri, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and posterior cingulate gyrus. Secondary analyses showed specific subregions of this network associated with knowledge of actions, manipulable artifacts, abstract concepts, and concrete concepts. The cortical regions involved in semantic processing can be grouped into 3 broad categories: posterior multimodal and heteromodal association cortex, heteromodal prefrontal cortex, and medial limbic regions. The expansion of these regions in the human relative to the nonhuman primate brain may explain uniquely human capacities to use language productively, plan, solve problems, and create cultural and technological artifacts, all of which depend on the fluid and efficient retrieval and manipulation of semantic knowledge.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhp055

Cites

439 of 439 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Items 401–439 of 439

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Broca, 1861, Remarques sur le siège de la faculté du langage articulé; suivies d'une observation d'aphemie, Bull Soc Anat Paris, 6, 330
  2. Brodmann, 1994, Localisation in the cerebral cortex
  3. Coltheart, 1980, Deep dyslexia
  4. Damasio, 1981, Cerebral localization of the aphasias, 27
  5. Marr, 1982, Vision
  6. Martin, 2000, Category-specificity and the brain: the sensory-motor model of semantic representations of objects, 1023
  7. Mesulam, 1985, Patterns in behavioral neuroanatomy: association areas, the limbic system, and hemispheric specialization, 1
  8. Neisser, 1967, Cognitive psychology
  9. Rapcsak, 1994, Localization of lesions in transcortical aphasia, 297
  10. Sarkissov, 1955, Atlas of the cytoarchitectonics of the human cerebral cortex
  11. Vogt, 1919, Allgemeinere Erg ebrisse unserer Hirnforschung, J Psychol Neurol, 25, 279
  12. Warrington, 1985, Agnosia: the impairment of object recognition, 333

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 4,060

Metadata

Authors
Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L.
Affiliations
Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2009-03-27
Volume
19
Issue
12
Pages
2767-2796
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2112891119
Cited by
4,060
References
439
Citations by year
2026: 208 · 2025: 280 · 2024: 226 · 2023: 244 · 2022: 331 · 2021: 270 · 2020: 359 · 2019: 288 · 2018: 239 · 2017: 268 · 2016: 257 · 2015: 269 · 2014: 206 · 2013: 211 · 2012: 172
FWCI
9.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH019992)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R03DC008416, R01DC006287)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS033576, R01NS035929)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (F32HD056767)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
semantic memory, semantic processing, semantic system, artificial neural networks, middle temporal gyrus, fusiform gyrus, parahippocampal gyrus, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, action knowledge, abstract concepts, concrete concepts, human evolution, primate brain, language, prefrontal cortex, association cortex
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Humans, Memory, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Neuroradiography, Semantics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review