Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 453

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dissociable Connectivity within Human Angular Gyrus and Intraparietal Sulcus: Evidence from Functional and Structural Connectivity

Open access
Uddin, L. Q., Supekar, K., Amin, H., Rykhlevskaia, E., Nguyen, D. A., Greicius, M. D., Menon, V.·2010·Cerebral Cortex
DOI 10.1093/cercor/bhq011
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The inferior parietal lobule (IPL) of the human brain is a heterogeneous region involved in visuospatial attention, memory, and mathematical cognition. Detailed description of connectivity profiles of subdivisions within the IPL is critical for accurate interpretation of functional neuroimaging studies involving this region. We separately examined functional and structural connectivity of the angular gyrus (AG) and the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) using probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps. Regions-of-interest (ROIs) included anterior and posterior AG subregions (PGa, PGp) and 3 IPS subregions (hIP2, hIP1, and hIP3). Resting-state functional connectivity analyses showed that PGa was more strongly linked to basal ganglia, ventral premotor areas, and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, while PGp was more strongly connected with ventromedial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate, and hippocampus-regions comprising the default mode network. The anterior-most IPS ROIs, hIP2 and hIP1, were linked with ventral premotor and middle frontal gyrus, while the posterior-most IPS ROI, hIP3, showed connectivity with extrastriate visual areas. In addition, hIP1 was connected with the insula. Tractography using diffusion tensor imaging revealed structural connectivity between most of these functionally connected regions. Our findings provide evidence for functional heterogeneity of cytoarchitectonically defined subdivisions within IPL and offer a novel framework for synthesis and interpretation of the task-related activations and deactivations involving the IPL during cognition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhq011

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Research works printed but not linked: 67

  1. Ansari, 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1820, 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.11.1820 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ansari, 2006, Brain research, 1067, 181, 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.10.083 · DOI
  3. Bammer, 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine : official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 48, 128, 10.1002/mrm.10184 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Baron-Cohen, 2000, Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 24, 355, 10.1016/S0149-7634(00)00011-7 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Barton, 2002, Neurology, 58, 71, 10.1212/WNL.58.1.71 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Basser, 1995, NMR in biomedicine, 8, 333, 10.1002/nbm.1940080707 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Basser, 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance. Series B, 111, 209, 10.1006/jmrb.1996.0086 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Ben-Shachar, 2007, Current opinion in neurobiology, 17, 258, 10.1016/j.conb.2007.03.006 · DOI
  9. 2009, Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2767, 10.1093/cercor/bhp055 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Burbaud, 1995, Journal of Neurophysiology, 74, 2194, 10.1152/jn.1995.74.5.2194 · DOI
  11. Cabeza, 2008, Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 9, 613, 10.1038/nrn2459 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Cantlon, 2006, PLoS biology, 4, e125, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040125 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Castellanos, 2008, Biological psychiatry, 63, 332, 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.06.025 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 2006, PNAS, 103, 4693, 10.1073/pnas.0600444103 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Chambers, 2004, Nature neuroscience, 7, 217, 10.1038/nn1203 · DOI
  16. Choi, 2006, The Journal of comparative neurology, 495, 53, 10.1002/cne.20849 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 2008, 41, 45, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.066 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Cohen Kadosh, 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 957, 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.6.957 · DOI
  19. Culham, 2006, Current opinion in neurobiology, 16, 205, 10.1016/j.conb.2006.03.005 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Dehaene, 2004, Current opinion in neurobiology, 14, 218, 10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.008 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Dehaene, 1999, Science, 284, 970, 10.1126/science.284.5416.970 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Delazer, 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research, 18, 76, 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.09.005 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 2008, Cerebral Cortex, 18, 2735, 10.1093/cercor/bhn041 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 2009, American Journal of Psychiatry, 166, 891, 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08121894 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 2005, PNAS, 102, 7350, 10.1073/pnas.0500003102 · DOI
  26. Duffau, 2002, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 73, 733, 10.1136/jnnp.73.6.733 · DOI
  27. Egner, 2008, Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 6141, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1262-08.2008 · DOI
  28. 2007, 56, 171
  29. Fransson, 2005, Human brain mapping, 26, 15, 10.1002/hbm.20113 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Frey, 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research, 23, 397, 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.11.010 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 1995, 2, 166, 10.1006/nimg.1995.1019 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Goodale, 1992, Trends in neurosciences, 15, 20, 10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Grefkes, 2005, Journal of Anatomy, 207, 3, 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00426.x · DOI · Paper page
  34. Gruber, 2001, Cerebral Cortex, 11, 350, 10.1093/cercor/11.4.350 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Habas, 2009, Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 8586, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1868-09.2009 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Hew, 2008, Physical Review Letters, 101, 036801, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.036801 · DOI
  37. 2009, PNAS, 106, 2035, 10.1073/pnas.0811168106 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Husain, 2007, Trends in cognitive sciences, 11, 30, 10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.011 · DOI
  39. Isaacs, 2001, Brain, 124, 1701, 10.1093/brain/124.9.1701 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 2007, 36, 993, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.051 · DOI
  41. Ischebeck, 2009, 44, 1103, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.025 · DOI
  42. 2003, Brain, 126, 2463, 10.1093/brain/awg248 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Jones, 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine : official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 51, 807, 10.1002/mrm.20033 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Jones, 2008, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 44, 936, 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.05.002 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 2008, 39, 1877, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.052 · DOI
  46. 2006, Cerebral Cortex, 16, 849, 10.1093/cercor/bhj028 · DOI
  47. Li, 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine : official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 55, 325, 10.1002/mrm.20783 · DOI
  48. Makin, 2007, Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 731, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3653-06.2007 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 2000, 12, 357, 10.1006/nimg.2000.0613 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 2003, 40, 847
  51. Mori, 1999, Annals of neurology, 45, 265, 10.1002/1531-8249(199902)45:2<265::AID-ANA21>3.0.CO;2-3 · DOI
  52. Nieder, 2009, Annual review of neuroscience, 32, 185, 10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135550 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Pajevic, 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997), 154, 85, 10.1006/jmre.2001.2452 · DOI
  54. 2007, 53, 293
  55. Price, 2007, Current biology : CB, 17, R1042, 10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.013 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 2009, The Behavioral and brain sciences, 32, 350, 10.1017/S0140525X09990860 · DOI
  57. 2008, 39, 417, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.045 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 2006, Cerebral Cortex, 16, 1418, 10.1093/cercor/bhj079 · DOI
  59. Seeley, 2009, 62, 42, 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.03.024 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Fahrenfort, 2008, Journal of Vision, 8, 12.1
  61. Shulman, 2009, Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 4392, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5609-08.2009 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Skudlarski, 2008, 43, 554, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.07.063 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Squire, 2009, Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 12711, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3575-09.2009 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 2007, 55, 521
  65. Vogel, 2005, Nature; Physical Science (London), 438, 500, 10.1038/nature04171 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 2009, Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2930, 10.1093/cercor/bhp063 · DOI
  67. Xu, 2009, Trends in cognitive sciences, 13, 167, 10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.008 · DOI

Cited by

See all 453

Metadata

Authors
Uddin, L. Q., Supekar, K., Amin, H., Rykhlevskaia, E., Nguyen, D. A., Greicius, M. D., & Menon, V.
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2010-02-12
Volume
20
Issue
11
Pages
2636-2646
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
DOI
10.1093/cercor/bhq011
OpenAlex
W2140024876
Cited by
453
References
30
FWCI
18.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dissociable Connectivity within Human Angular Gyrus and Intraparietal Sulcus: Evidence from Functional and Structural Connectivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cercor/bhq011
The paper
Uddin, L. Q., Supekar, K., Amin, H., Rykhlevskaia, E., Nguyen, D. A., Greicius, M. D., & Menon, V. (2010). Dissociable Connectivity within Human Angular Gyrus and Intraparietal Sulcus: Evidence from Functional and Structural Connectivity. Cerebral Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhq011

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.