Cited by 30Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural dynamics and brain function

In vivo assay of cortical microcircuitry in frontotemporal dementia: a platform for experimental medicine studies

Open access
Shaw, Alexander D, Hughes, Laura E, Moran, Rosalyn, Coyle-Gilchrist, Ian, Rittman, Tim, Rowe, James B·2021·Cerebral Cortex

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The analysis of neural circuits can provide crucial insights into the mechanisms of neurodegeneration and dementias, and offer potential quantitative biological tools to assess novel therapeutics. Here we use behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) as a model disease. We demonstrate that inversion of canonical microcircuit models to noninvasive human magnetoencephalography, using dynamic causal modeling, can identify the regional- and laminar-specificity of bvFTD pathophysiology, and their parameters can accurately differentiate patients from matched healthy controls. Using such models, we show that changes in local coupling in frontotemporal dementia underlie the failure to adequately establish sensory predictions, leading to altered prediction error responses in a cortical information-processing hierarchy. Using machine learning, this model-based approach provided greater case–control classification accuracy than conventional evoked cortical responses. We suggest that this approach provides an in vivo platform for testing mechanistic hypotheses about disease progression and pharmacotherapeutics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhz024

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two small cross-sectional MEG studies suggested that disruption of sensory/auditory information processing in frontotemporal networks may be a useful biomarker to detect early disease progression.

    “two small yet promising cross-sectional studies on disruption of sensory/auditory information processing, as measured by magnetoencephalography (MEG) analysis of cortical microcircuits, suggested these changes in frontotemporal networks may be a useful biomarker to detect (early) disease progression (2013, N = 12, 2019, N = 44) (Hughes and Rowe, 2013; Shaw et al., 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Phillips HN Blenkmann A Hughes LE Bekinschtein TA Rowe JB Hierarchical Organization of Frontotemporal Networks for the Prediction of Stimuli across Multiple Dimensions J Neurosci 2015b 35 9255 9264 26109651 PMC4478247

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shaw, A. D., Hughes, L. E., Moran, R., Coyle-Gilchrist, I., Rittman, T., & Rowe, J. B.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Corresponding author
Rowe, James B
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2019-06-19
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
1837-1847
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2949471022
Cited by
30
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Medical Research Council (MC-A060-5PQ30)
  • NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (104943/Z/14/Z)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, cortical microcircuitry, dynamic causal modeling, magnetoencephalography, local coupling, prediction error, sensory prediction, laminar specificity, case-control classification, neurodegeneration, experimental medicine
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Aged, Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Neurological, Neural Pathways, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetoencephalography, Biomedical Research, Frontotemporal Dementia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review