Cited by 89SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

Warp Speed for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccines: Why Are Children Stuck in Neutral?

Open access
Anderson, Evan J, Campbell, James D, Creech, C Buddy, Frenck, Robert, Kamidani, Satoshi, Munoz, Flor M, Nachman, Sharon, Spearman, Paul·2021·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

While adult clinical trials of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines have moved quickly into phase 3 clinical trials, clinical trials have not started in children in the United States. The direct COVID-19 impact upon children is greater than that observed for a number of other pathogens for which we now have effective pediatric vaccines. Additionally, the role of children in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission has clearly been underappreciated. Carefully conducted phase 2 clinical trials can adequately address potential COVID-19 vaccine safety concerns. Delaying phase 2 vaccine clinical trials in children will delay our recovery from COVID-19 and unnecessarily prolong its impact upon children’s education, health, and emotional well-being, and equitable access to opportunities for development and social success. Given the potential direct and indirect benefits of pediatric vaccination, implementation of phase 2 clinical trials for COVID-19 vaccines should begin now.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/ciaa1425

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Indirect benefits of vaccination include the likelihood of reduced transmission in the home and school settings, including transmission affecting vulnerable persons, and safer in-person learning.

    “Indirect benefits include the likelihood of reduced transmission in the home and in school settings, including transmission affecting vulnerable persons, and safer in-person learning.26-29”
  • Without effective Covid-19 vaccines for this age group, children could potentially become ongoing reservoirs of infection and sources of newly emerging variants.

    “Without effective Covid-19 vaccines for this age group, children could potentially become ongoing reservoirs of infection and sources of newly emerging variants.26,30”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [39]Keech C, Albert G, Reed P, et al. First-in-human trial of a SARS CoV 2 recombinant spike protein nanoparticle vaccine. medRxiv 2020; doi: 2020.08.05.20168435. PMC7494251 32877576
  2. [48]Zhu FC, Li YH, Guan XH, et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a recombinant adenovirus type-5 vectored COVID-19 vaccine: a dose-escalation, open-label, non-randomised, first-in-human trial. Lancet 2020; 395: 1845– 54. 32450106 PMC7255193

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, E. J., Campbell, J. D., Creech, C. B., Frenck, R., Kamidani, S., Munoz, F. M., Nachman, S., & Spearman, P.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
  • Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
  • State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Anderson, Evan J
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2020-09-18
Volume
73
Issue
2
Pages
336-340
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W3087530397
Cited by
89
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 6
FWCI
2.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Keywords
COVID-19 vaccines, SARS-CoV-2, vaccine safety, vaccine development timeline
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, Adult, Child, Humans, Vaccination, Viral Vaccines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review