Cited by 115COVID-19 and Mental HealthHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutOccupational Health and Burnout

Care for the Psychological Status of Frontline Medical Staff Fighting Against Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Open access
Huang, Jing, Liu, Fangkun, Teng, Ziwei, Chen, Jindong, Zhao, Jingping, Wang, Xiaoping, Wu, Renrong·2020·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

To the Editor—The outbreak of the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infection in Wuhan has rapidly and widely spread nationwide and to other countries, which has caused an exponential increase in patients with infection. As of 23 March 2020, the number of confirmed cases of COVID-19 infection increased to 81 171 in the Chinese mainland, including 3277 deaths and 1573 patients in critical condition [1]. With the national fight to combat the COVID-19 for about 60 days after Wuhan was sealed off, the number of confirmed cases in China, including in Hubei province, has continued to decline and suspected cases nationwide have also dropped sharply. However, the number of cases of infection in other countries is still rising, with a rapid increase in Europe, especially in Italy, and other parts of the world. A total of 302 704 patients with confirmed disease and 28 342 deaths have been reported in countries outside of China so far. Frontline medical workers and scientists have played a leading role in fighting against the COVID-19 outbreak. China has sent many medical staff from across the country to Hubei province in the virus fight. Almost all medical workers in Hubei province have worked on the frontline to participate in the emergency response. According to preliminary estimates, there were more than 80 000 medical workers in 131 COVID-19–designated hospitals, and more than 170 000 medical workers in Hubei province fighting against COVID-19. In additon, a total of 6097 medical workers from different provinces in China were in Hubei province to assist in the response to COVID-19 by 30 January 2020 [2]. More medical teams were then sent out to the hardest-hit areas in Hubei province, including rescue and medical teams from different provinces, the army medical teams, specialized doctors’ and nurses’ teams, and emergency medical teams from different hospitals. For example, the emergency medical team from the Second Xiangya Hospital was able to set up field hospitals and ambulances to help and serve the victims. These medical staff are in the forefront of the battle to combat COVID-19, providing medical services to the most affected areas. The updates of confirmed case numbers of medical staff infection have alarmed the pandemic status and severity of COVID-19. As of 11 February, statistical data show that the outbreak has caused 1716 confirmed cases of medical staff infection, with 1502 (87.5% of the total medical staff infections) in Hubei province, and a grievous loss of 6 lives. The majority of these cases came from Wuhan, where 1102 medical staff were infected with COVID-19 in the outbreak [3]. On 24 February, the World Health Organization–China Joint Mission on COVID-19 held a press conference in Beijing and announced that over 3000 medical personnel were infected with COVID-19. On 23 March, there were 4824 medical staff who had been infected with COVID-19 in Italy [4]. Mental health care for the frontline medical workers around the word is urgently needed [5]. The frontline medical professionals have worked under great psychological stress and faced many challenges and losses [6]. The large number of patients with COVID-19, suspected cases, hospitalizations, and patients in critical condition has made the medical work incredibly hard. The transmission of COVID-19 from humans to humans and the increasing number of deaths could elicit their unease and fear about getting infected. The bad outcomes of some critical patients and the suffering of patients and their relatives could lead to worsening anxiety and mental distress. The lack of medical supplies, the uncertain information from various resources, the loneliness, and concerns for their loved ones may increase the mental pressure. These factors will increase medical staffs’ anxiety and lead them to be reluctant to work [7]. Although the National Health Commission of China has released the notification of basic principles for emergency psychological crisis interventions for the patients with COVID-19 pneumonia [8], the psychological condition of healthcare workers has often been neglected [6, 9]. To this, a recent notice issued by the State Council announced that the governments should provide a guarantee for the frontline medical workers and their families [10]. In addition to basic goods and supplies, security, and work subsidies, the notice emphasized the importance of timely mental health care for medical staff. First, to provide health and life support to prevent them from being vulnerable to potential physical and mental health problems, including COVID-19. Second, to find and help with the negative psychological status and sleep disorders of healthcare staff to promote the prevention and intervention of mental diseases. Third, to build and encourage the communication of healthcare staff and their families, relieve their psychological stress, and strengthen the confidence and courage to defeat the disease. The State Council on 11 February issu

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/ciaa385

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 5 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, J., Liu, F., Teng, Z., Chen, J., Zhao, J., Wang, X., & Wu, R.
Affiliations
  • Central South University (CN)
  • Xiangya Hospital Central South University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wu, Renrong
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2020-04-03
Volume
71
Issue
12
Pages
3268-3269
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W3014565622
Cited by
115
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 25
FWCI
10.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Nature Science Foundation of China (81901401)
  • Key R&D Program Projects
  • National Science Foundation of China (2016YFC1306900, 81622018)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, psychological state, mental health of healthcare workers, psychological support, occupational infection risk, Hubei Province, emergency response, field hospitals, medical ethics education
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Anxiety, China, Cross-Sectional Studies, Health Personnel, Humans, Medical Staff

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review