Cited by 18COVID-19 and Mental HealthHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutOccupational Health and Burnout

COVID-19, anxiety, and hopelessness: quality of life among healthcare workers in Turkey

Open access
Mert, Selda, Peker Karatoprak, Ayfer, Demirhan, Yeliz, Baydemir, Canan, Çetinarslan, Berrin, Cantürk, Zeynep, Selek, Alev, Aydin, Levent +2 more·2022·Evaluation & the Health Professions

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The aim of the study is to investigate the effects of intense anxiety and hopelessness experienced by healthcare workers during the pandemic on their quality of life. This cross-sectional, online questionnaire-based study was conducted between August 31, 2020 and October 31, 2020, with 729 healthcare workers in Turkey. The study showed that hopelessness, the weekly working time, fatigue, and the workload of healthcare workers negatively affected their quality of life, those who found the pandemic measures inadequate had a lower quality of life and higher hopelessness levels, and those who needed knowledge on various issues to improve their skills had lower quality of life and higher levels of anxiety and hopelessness. Increasing the measures to make healthcare workers feel competent and ready during the COVID-19 pandemic and meet their information needs to improve their skills will reduce their anxiety and hopelessness and improve their quality of life. Identifying the factors affecting anxiety, hopelessness, and quality of life will help achieve sustainable success in the delivery of health services and promote employee health and safety.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/01632787211067530

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Workers experiencing high levels of burnout were more likely to feel hopeless.

    “Research indicates that workers experiencing high levels of burnout were more likely to feel hopeless”

    From Evolution of burnout syndrome in Spanish healthcare professionals during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: psychosocial variables involved (2025) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) mentions burnout and hopelessness together when describing other studies, but does not report that workers with higher burnout were more likely to feel hopeless. A search for “burnout” found no such association in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. North America Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA), Nursing Diagnosis: De nitions and Classi casion, Wiley Blackwell publication, Indianapolis. 2009.
  2. Eser SY, Fidaner H, Elbi H, et al. Measure of quality of life WHOQOL-100 and WHOQOL-Bref. 3P Journal, 1999;7(2):5-13.
  3. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RC, Luschene RE. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Invenntory. Consulting Psychologists Press, California, 1970.
  4. Seber G, Dilbaz N, Kaptanoğlu C, Tekin D. Umutsuzluk Ölçeği: Geçerlilik ve güvenirliği. Kriz Dergisi, 1993;1:139-142.
  5. Shaw SCK. Hopelessness, helplessness and resilience: The importance of safeguarding our trainees' mental wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nurse Education in Practice, 2020;44:102780.
  6. Kliem S, Lohmann A, Mößle T, Brähler E. Psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the Beck hopelessness scale (BHS): Results from a German representative population sample. BMC Psychiatry, 2018;18(1):110-111.
  7. Arslantaş H, Adana F, Kaya F, Turan DHopelessness and social support level in the inpatients and factors affecting them. İ.U.F.N. Hem. Derg, 2010;18(2):87-97.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mert, S., Peker Karatoprak, A., Demirhan, Y., Baydemir, C., Çetinarslan, B., Cantürk, Z., Selek, A., Aydin, L., Sözen, M., & Gezer, E.
Affiliations
  • Kocaeli Üniversitesi (TR)
  • Kocaeli Vocational School of Health Services, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey
  • Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey
Corresponding author
Mert, Selda
Venue
Evaluation & the Health Professions
Published
2021-12-22
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
97-107
ISSN
  • 0163-2787 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3918
OpenAlex
W4225901242
Cited by
18
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Evaluation & the Health Professions (publishedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kocaeli Üniversitesi - AVESİS (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers, anxiety, hopelessness, quality of life, workload, fatigue, working hours, pandemic control measures, professional competence, information needs, employee health
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Anxiety, Cross-Sectional Studies, Health Personnel, Humans, Quality of Life, Turkey, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review