Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 853

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical Characteristics of Refractory Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Wuhan, China

Open access
Mo, Pingzheng, Xing, Yuanyuan, Xiao, Yu, Deng, Liping, Zhao, Qiu, Wang, Hongling, Xiong, Yong, Cheng, Zhenshun, Gao, Shicheng, Liang, Ke, Luo, Mingqi, Chen, Tielong, Song, Shihui, Ma, Zhiyong, Chen, Xiaoping, Zheng, Ruiying, Cao, Qian, Wang, Fan, Zhang, Yongxi·2021·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Background: Since December 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe adult respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, occurred in Wuhan, and rapidly spread throughout China. This study aimed to clarify the characteristics of patients with refractory COVID-19. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, we included 155 consecutive patients with confirmed COVID-19 in Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University from 1 January to 5 February. The cases were divided into general and refractory COVID-19 groups according to the clinical efficacy of treatment after hospitalization, and the differences between groups were compared. Results: Compared with patients with general COVID-19 (45.2%), those with refractory disease were older, were more likely to be male, and had more underlying comorbid conditions, a lower incidence of fever, higher maximum temperatures among patients with fever, higher incidences of shortness of breath and anorexia, more severe disease assessment at admission, higher neutrophil, aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, and C-reactive protein levels, lower platelet counts and albumin levels, and higher incidences of bilateral pneumonia and pleural effusion (P < .05). Patients with refractory COVID-19 were more likely to receive oxygen, mechanical ventilation, expectorant, and adjunctive treatment, including corticosteroids, antiviral drugs, and immune enhancers (P < .05). Considering the factors of disease severity at admission, mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit transfer, patients with refractory COVID-19 were also more likely to be male, have manifestations of anorexia on admission, and receive oxygen, expectorant, and adjunctive agents (P < .05). Conclusion: In nearly 50% of patients with COVID-19 obvious clinical and radiological remission was not achieved within 10 days after hospitalization. Male, anorexia, and no fever at admission was predictive of poor treatment efficacy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/ciaa270

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 853

Metadata

Authors
Mo, P., Xing, Y., Xiao, Y., Deng, L., Zhao, Q., Wang, H., Xiong, Y., Cheng, Z., Gao, S., Liang, K., Luo, M., Chen, T., Song, S., Ma, Z., Chen, X., Zheng, R., Cao, Q., Wang, F., & Zhang, Y.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2020-03-16
Volume
73
Issue
11
Pages
e4208-e4213
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W3010738632
Cited by
853
References
17
FWCI
24.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Funders
Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University (ZNYB2019003)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Characteristics of Refractory Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cid/ciaa270
The paper
Mo, P., Xing, Y., Xiao, Y., Deng, L., Zhao, Q., Wang, H., Xiong, Y., Cheng, Z., Gao, S., Liang, K., Luo, M., Chen, T., Song, S., Ma, Z., Chen, X., Zheng, R., Cao, Q., Wang, F., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Clinical Characteristics of Refractory Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa270

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.