Cited by 51Syphilis Diagnosis and TreatmentHistorical Medical Research and TreatmentsVector-borne infectious diseases

A multicenter study evaluating ceftriaxone and benzathine penicillin G as treatment agents for early syphilis in Jiangsu, China.

Open access
Cao, Yuping, Su, Xiaohong, Wang, Qianqiu, Xue, Huazhong, Zhu, Xiaofeng, Zhang, Chuanfu, Jiang, Juan, Qi, Shuzhen +8 more·2017·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of ceftriaxone and benzathine penicillin G (BPG) in nonpregnant, immunocompetent adults with early syphilis because there is a lack of clinical evidence supporting ceftriaxone as an alternative treatment for early syphilis without an human immunodeficiency virus coinfection. METHODS: A randomized, open-label controlled study evaluating the efficacy of ceftriaxone and BPG was conducted in 4 hospitals in Jiangsu Province. Treatment comprised either ceftriaxone (1.0 g, given intravenously, once daily for 10 days) or BPG (2.4 million units, given intramuscularly, once weekly for 2 weeks). A serological response was defined as a ≥4-fold decline in the rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titer. RESULTS: In all, 301 patients with early syphilis were enrolled in this study; 230 subjects completed the follow-ups. The serological response at 6 months of follow up was observed in 90.2% in ceftriaxone group and 78.0% in BPG group (P = .01). There was no significant difference between treatment groups in patients with primary or early latent syphilis, but among patients with secondary syphilis the difference was highly significant (95.8% vs 76.2%; P < .01). Moreover, patients exhibiting a Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction after treatment might have a shorter period before a serological response (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, ceftriaxone regimen was noninferior to the BPG regimen in nonpregnant, immunocompetent patients with early syphilis. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ChiCTR-TQR-13003624.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/cix611

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ceftriaxone (1 g daily either IM or IV for 10 days) is effective for treating primary and secondary syphilis.

    “Limited clinical studies, along with biologic and pharmacologic evidence, indicate that ceftriaxone (1 g daily either IM or IV for 10 days) is effective for treating primary and secondary syphilis”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [603]

    The Abstract and Discussion (page numbers not supplied) support ceftriaxone’s effectiveness for primary and secondary syphilis with 1 g daily for 10 days. The study administered it intravenously; our copy does not establish that the intramuscular route is effective with this regimen. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Ceftriaxone 1-2 g daily either IM or IV for 10-14 days can be used as an alternative treatment for persons with neurosyphilis.

    “Limited data indicate that ceftriaxone 1–2 g daily either IM or IV for 10–14 days can be used as an alternative treatment for persons with neurosyphilis (603,616,617).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [603]

    The Discussion (page not provided) reports that ceftriaxone may be an option for CNS syphilis and has reportedly been effective for neurosyphilis. It does not give the claimed neurosyphilis regimen of 1–2 g daily by IM or IV injection for 10–14 days; the 1 g IV daily for 10 days described in the paper was studied for early syphilis. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several different ceftriaxone regimens have been shown to be effective for the treatment of early syphilis.

    “Several different ceftriaxone regimens have been shown to be effective for the treatment of early syphilis.104–113”

    From BASHH UK guidelines for the management of syphilis 2024 (2024) · cites this paper as [113]

    The Abstract reports that one ceftriaxone regimen—1.0 g intravenously daily for 10 days—was noninferior to benzathine penicillin G for early syphilis in nonpregnant, immunocompetent patients. The Discussion also reports favorable results from a meta-analysis, but our copy does not establish that several different ceftriaxone regimens were effective. Page numbers were not provided for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The optimal dose and duration of ceftriaxone therapy for primary and secondary syphilis have not been defined.

    “however, the optimal dose and duration of ceftriaxone therapy have not been defined (602,603).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [603]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Gong X, Yue X, Teng F, Jiang N, Mei P. Syphilis in China from 2000 to 2013: epi- demiological trends and characteristics. Chin J Dermatol 2014; 47:310-5.
  2. Wang Q, Wang B, Yin Y, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of syph- ilis, gonorrhea, genital herpes and genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in China (2014). Chin J Dermatol 2014; 47:365-72.
  3. Qin JB, Yang TB, Feng TJ, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical controlled trials on effect of ceftriaxone sodium for treatment of early syphilis. Chin J Nosocomiol 2014; 24:1885-8.
  4. Wang ST, Ruan LM, Liu GY, Zhu WF, Jiang XL, Shu GB. Assessment of efficacy of benzathine penicillin, procaine penicillin and ceftriaxone in the treatment of early syphilis. Chin J Leprosy Skin Dis 2015; 31:473-5.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cao, Y., Su, X., Wang, Q., Xue, H., Zhu, X., Zhang, C., Jiang, J., Qi, S., Gong, X., Zhu, X., Pan, M., Ren, H., Hu, W., Wei, Z., Tian, M., & Liu, W.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
  • Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital (CN)
  • The First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang (CN)
  • Xuzhou Medical College (CN)
Corresponding author
Su, Xiaohong
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2017-07-17
Volume
65
Issue
10
Pages
1683-1688
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2735671091
Cited by
51
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Government of Jiangsu Province (BL2012003)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Historical Medical Research and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
Keywords
early syphilis, ceftriaxone, benzathine penicillin G, antibiotic efficacy, serological response, RPR, Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction, secondary syphilis, primary syphilis, latent syphilis, non-inferiority
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Ceftriaxone, China, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Penicillin G Benzathine, Syphilis, Syphilis Serodiagnosis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review