Cited by 49Syphilis Diagnosis and TreatmentHistorical Medical Research and TreatmentsReproductive tract infections research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A study evaluating ceftriaxone as a treatment agent for primary and secondary syphilis in pregnancy.

Zhou, Pingyu, Gu, Zhiying, Xu, Jinhua, Wang, Xiasheng, Liao, Kanghuang·2005·Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of ceftriaxone in pregnant women who were diagnosed with early syphilis. STUDY: Eleven women with a history of penicillin allergy, positive skin test, but prior history of safe usage of cephalosporins were included. Ceftriaxone (250 mg) was given intramuscularly once daily for 7 and 10 days to patients with primary and secondary syphilis, respectively. A second course of therapy was provided at 28 weeks' gestation. The rapid plasma reagin test (RPR) was measured before and after therapy. The blood of neonates was also tested at delivery and during the follow-up period. RESULTS: The serum RPR titers of 11 mothers decreased fourfold, 3 months after treatment. Ten patients developed negative RPR results. The serum RPR was negative at delivery or 6 months after delivery in all neonates. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftriaxone may be considered as an alternative for treatment of early syphilis in pregnancy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.olq.0000170443.70739.cd

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data are insufficient to recommend ceftriaxone or other cephalosporins for treatment of maternal infection and prevention of congenital syphilis.

    “Data are insufficient to recommend ceftriaxone or other cephalosporins for treatment of maternal infection and prevention of congenital syphilis (646,647).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [646]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 2004, 2003 Report on STD epidemic analysis in China., Bull STI Prevent Control, 18, 1
  2. Zhou, 2001, [Case control study of ceftriaxone in the treatment of early syphilis.], J Clin Dermatol, 30, 188

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhou, P., Gu, Z., Xu, J., Wang, X., & Liao, K.
Affiliations
Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhou, Pingyu
Venue
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Published
2005-08
Volume
32
Issue
8
Pages
495-498
ISSN
0148-5717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029158439
Cited by
49
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Historical Medical Research and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
ceftriaxone, maternal syphilis, primary syphilis, secondary syphilis, penicillin allergy, cephalosporin therapy, RPR, neonatal syphilis, maternal syphilis treatment
MeSH terms
Adult, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Ceftriaxone, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Injections, Intramuscular, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Pregnancy Trimesters, Syphilis, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review