Cited by 76Syphilis Diagnosis and TreatmentHistorical Medical Research and TreatmentsAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy

Treatment of neurosyphilis with ceftriaxone.

Open access
Shann, S·2003·Sexually Transmitted Infections

Abstract

The first choice treatment for late syphilis is penicillin. Other than doxycycline, which penetrates the CNS, there are few alternatives for the treatment of neurosyphilis. We report a case of successful treatment of symptomatic neurosyphilis with parenteral ceftriaxone.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/sti.79.5.415

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ceftriaxone 1-2 g daily either IM or IV for 10-14 days can be used as an alternative treatment for persons with neurosyphilis.

    “Limited data indicate that ceftriaxone 1–2 g daily either IM or IV for 10–14 days can be used as an alternative treatment for persons with neurosyphilis (603,616,617).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [617]

    The Case Report describes successful treatment with 1 g of ceftriaxone daily for 14 days, and the Discussion specifies three days IV followed by 11 days IM. The Discussion suggests ceftriaxone may be an alternative, but does not establish the full 1–2 g, 10–14-day regimen and cautions that efficacy in patients with HIV coinfection is uncertain. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hahn RD, Webster B, Weickhardt G, et al. The results of treatment of 1086 general paralytics the majority of whom were followed up for more than 5 years. J Chron Dis 1958;7:209-27.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shann, S.
Affiliations
Leeds General Infirmary (GB)
Corresponding author
Shann, S
Venue
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2003-10-01
Volume
79
Issue
5
Pages
415-416
ISSN
  • 0007-134X (ISSN-L)
  • 1368-4973
OpenAlex
W2167757726
Cited by
76
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sexually Transmitted Infections (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Historical Medical Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Keywords
neurosyphilis, ceftriaxone, late syphilis, parenteral antibiotics, CNS penetration, doxycycline
MeSH terms
Antitreponemal Agents, Ceftriaxone, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neurosyphilis, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review