Cited by 26Labor market dynamics and wage inequalityDigital Economy and Work TransformationEconomic Development and Digital Transformation

No automation please, we’re British: technology and the prospects for work

Open access
Spencer, David, Slater, Gary·2020·Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society

Abstract

This article assesses the impact and probably limits of automation. It looks, in particular, at the case of the UK economy. The prospects for automation are seen as necessarily uncertain and potentially regressive in their effects, with technology likely to sustain a large number of low-quality jobs. The deep-seated problems of the UK economy—low-investment, low-productivity and low-real wages—are seen as key impediments to forms of automation that work for all in society. It is argued that, without wider institutional reform, the UK will be unable to reap the full potential of automation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cjres/rsaa003

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Different structures of the economy, the education system, and so on, mean that AI impacts work differently in different economies, making generalisation from one national context to another difficult.

    “Many researchers highlight the difficulty of generalising from one national context to another, as different structures of the economy, the education system, and so on, mean that AI impacts work differently in different economies (Luksha et al. 2015;Spencer and Slater 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Appelbaum, E., Batt, R. and Clark, I. (2013) Implications of financial capitalism, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 51: 498-518.
  2. Coulter, S. (2016) The UK labour market and the 'great recession'. In M. Myant, S. Theodoropoulou and A. Piasna, (eds.) Unemployment, Internal Devaluation and Labour Market Deregulation in Europe. pp.197-227.
  3. Grimshaw, C. Fagan, G. Hebson and I. Tavora, Making Work More Equal: A New Labour Market Segmentation Approach. pp. 188-207. Manchester, Manchester University Press.
  4. IFR (2018A) Robot density rises globally, IFR Press Releases, 7 th February 2018, Frankfurt, International Federation of Robotics. Available online at: https://ifr.org/ifr-press-releases/news/robot-density-rises-globally [Accessed 30 November 2018].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spencer, D., & Slater, G.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Slater, Gary
Venue
Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society
Published
2020-03
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
117-134
ISSN
  • 1752-1378 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-1386
OpenAlex
W3013202251
Cited by
26
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economic Development and Digital Transformation
Keywords
automation, future of work, low-quality jobs, low productivity, low investment, real wages, institutional reform, UK economy, technology and employment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review