The History of Technological Anxiety and the Future of Economic Growth: Is This Time Different?
Abstract
Technology is widely considered the main source of economic progress, but it has also generated cultural anxiety throughout history. The developed world is now suffering from another bout of such angst. Anxieties over technology can take on several forms, and we focus on three of the most prominent concerns. First, there is the concern that technological progress will cause widespread substitution of machines for labor, which in turn could lead to technological unemployment and a further increase in inequality in the short run, even if the long-run effects are beneficial. Second, there has been anxiety over the moral implications of technological process for human welfare, broadly defined. While, during the Industrial Revolution, the worry was about the dehumanizing effects of work, in modern times, perhaps the greater fear is a world where the elimination of work itself is the source of dehumanization. A third concern cuts in the opposite direction, suggesting that the epoch of major technological progress is behind us. Understanding the history of technological anxiety provides perspective on whether this time is truly different. We consider the role of these three anxieties among economists, primarily focusing on the historical period from the late 18th to the early 20th century, and then compare the historical and current manifestations of these three concerns.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The handloom weavers and frame knitters with their little workshops were quite rapidly wiped out by factories after 1815.
“the handloom weavers and frame knitters with their little workshops were quite rapidly wiped out by factories after 1815”
From Applying AI to Rebuild Middle Class Jobs (2024) · cites this paper as Mokyr et al., 2015
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0174 · Cited by 2,732 · see citing works
Braganza, A., Chen, W., Canhoto, A., & Sap, S. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.018 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Coombs, C., Hislop, D., Taneva, S. K., & Barnard, S. (2020) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101600 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Man Versus Machine: Resisting Automation in Identity-Based Consumer Behavior
Leung, E., Paolacci, G., & Puntoni, S. (2018) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/0022243718818423 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Hui, X., Reshef, O., & Zhou, L. (2024) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2023.18441 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Working Algorithms: Software Automation and the Future of Work
Shestakofsky, B. (2017) · Work and Occupations · doi:10.1177/0730888417726119 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Applying AI to Rebuild Middle Class Jobs
Autor, D. (2024) · doi:10.3386/w32140 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
“Why Is Labor Receiving a Smaller Share of Global Income? Theory and Empirical Evidence”
Dao, M., Das, M., Koczan, Z., & Lian, W. (2017) · IMF Working Papers · doi:10.5089/9781484311042.001 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Synergy Between AI and Robotics: A Comprehensive Integration
Ness, S., Shepherd, N. J., & Xuan, T. R. (2023) · Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science · doi:10.9734/ajrcos/2023/v16i4372 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
No automation please, we’re British: technology and the prospects for work
Spencer, D., & Slater, G. (2020) · Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society · doi:10.1093/cjres/rsaa003 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Cukier, W. (2019) · Journal of Global Responsibility · doi:10.1108/jgr-11-2018-0079 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mokyr, J., Vickers, C., & Ziebarth, N. L.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Auburn University (US)
- University of Iowa (US)
- ORCID
- Vickers, Chris
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2015-08-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 31-50
- ISSN
- 0895-3309 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1950752004
- Cited by
- 698
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 56 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 144.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Economic Perspectives (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economic Development and Digital Transformation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
- Keywords
- technology anxiety, economic growth, technological unemployment, inequality, dehumanization, Industrial Revolution, history of economic thought, future of work, technological progress
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review