The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase from Leuconostoc mesenteroides in the Hexokinase Method for Determining Glucose in Serum
Abstract
The hexokinase (EC 2.7.1.1)/glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (I) (EC 1.1.1.49) method of glucose analysis is highly accurate, precise, and sensitive when I from Leuconostoc mesenteroides and NAD+ are used. Coefficients of variation ranged from 0.68 to 8.9% for glucose standards between 0.56 and 27.7 mmol/liter. Recovery was 103 ± 10% for glucose standards added to sera of known glucose content. Although no substances investigated interfere with the test system when present at their normal or likely concentrations in serum, final reaction mixtures containing mannose (>0.28 mmol/liter), fructose (3.7 mmol/liter), or 2-deoxy-D-glucose (4.01 mmol/liter) inhibit the analysis. With all constituents lyophilized, the reagent mixture is stable for at least a year at 4 °C and for five days at 40 °C. Within-day reproducibility averaged 0.83%; day-to-day precision was 1.3%. We compared results of hexokinase/glucose procedures by using I from yeast (with NADP+) and from L. mesenteroides (with either NAD+ or NADP+ as coenzyme); there was complete correlation over a serum glucose range of 4 to 12 mmol/liter (72 to 217 mg/dl). Use of NAD+ with I from L. mesenteroides is advantageous because of the decreased cost and greater stability of the coenzyme.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Brown, T. T. (2005) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.165.10.1179 · Cited by 851
Enhancement of cellulose saccharification kinetics using an ionic liquid pretreatment step
Dadi, A. P., Varanasi, S., & Schall, C. A. (2006) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.21047 · Cited by 574
Regenerating cellulose from ionic liquids for an accelerated enzymatic hydrolysis
Zhao, H., Jones, C. L., Baker, G. A., Xia, S., Olubajo, O., & Person, V. N. (2009) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.08.009 · Cited by 492
A prospective evaluation of the directionality of the depression–inflammation relationship
Stewart, J. C., Rand, K. L., Muldoon, M. F., & Kamarck, T. W. (2009) · Brain, Behavior, and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2009.04.011 · Cited by 390
“Standard assays were performed to assess high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (Warnick and Albers, 1978) and triglycerides (Bucolo and David, 1973), and fasting serum glucose and insulin were measured by standard colorimetry (Bondar and Mead, 1974) and radioimmunoassay, respectively.”
MethodGrompe, M., al-Dhalimy, M., Finegold, M., Ou, C. N., Burlingame, T., Kennaway, N. G., & Soriano, P. (1993) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.7.12a.2298 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Bondar, R. J. L., & Mead, D. C.
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1974-05-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 586-590
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W1955042231
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase from Leuconostoc mesenteroides in the Hexokinase Method for Determining Glucose in Serum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/clinchem/20.5.586
- The paper
- Bondar, R. J. L., & Mead, D. C. (1974). Evaluation of Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase from Leuconostoc mesenteroides in the Hexokinase Method for Determining Glucose in Serum. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/20.5.586
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.