Cited by 492Biofuel production and bioconversionAdvanced Cellulose Research StudiesIonic liquids properties and applications

Regenerating cellulose from ionic liquids for an accelerated enzymatic hydrolysis

Zhao, Hua, Jones, Cecil L., Baker, Gary A., Xia, Shuqian, Olubajo, Olarongbe, Person, Vernecia N.·2009·Journal of Biotechnology

Abstract

The efficient conversion of lignocellulosic materials into fuel ethanol has become a research priority in producing affordable and renewable energy. The pretreatment of lignocelluloses is known to be key to the fast enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Recently, certain ionic liquids (ILs) were found capable of dissolving more than 10wt% cellulose. Preliminary investigations [Dadi, A.P., Varanasi, S., Schall, C.A., 2006. Enhancement of cellulose saccharification kinetics using an ionic liquid pretreatment step. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 95, 904-910; Liu, L., Chen, H., 2006. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose materials treated with ionic liquid [BMIM]Cl. Chin. Sci. Bull. 51, 2432-2436; Dadi, A.P., Schall, C.A., Varanasi, S., 2007. Mitigation of cellulose recalcitrance to enzymatic hydrolysis by ionic liquid pretreatment. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 137-140, 407-421] suggest that celluloses regenerated from IL solutions are subject to faster saccharification than untreated substrates. These encouraging results offer the possibility of using ILs as alternative and non-volatile solvents for cellulose pretreatment. However, these studies are limited to two chloride-based ILs: (a) 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ([BMIM]Cl), which is a corrosive, toxic and extremely hygroscopic solid (m.p. approximately 70 degrees C), and (b) 1-allyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ([AMIM]Cl), which is viscous and has a reactive side-chain. Therefore, more in-depth research involving other ILs is much needed to explore this promising pretreatment route. For this reason, we studied a number of chloride- and acetate-based ILs for cellulose regeneration, including several ILs newly developed in our laboratory. This will enable us to select inexpensive, efficient and environmentally benign solvents for processing cellulosic biomass. Our data confirm that all regenerated celluloses are less crystalline (58-75% lower) and more accessible to cellulase (>2 times) than untreated substrates. As a result, regenerated Avicel((R)) cellulose, filter paper and cotton were hydrolyzed 2-10 times faster than the respective untreated celluloses. A complete hydrolysis of Avicel((R)) cellulose could be achieved in 6h given the Trichoderma reesei cellulase/substrate ratio (w/w) of 3:20 at 50 degrees C. In addition, we observed that cellulase is more thermally stable (up to 60 degrees C) in the presence of regenerated cellulose. Furthermore, our systematic studies suggest that the presence of various ILs during the hydrolysis induced different degrees of cellulase inactivation. Therefore, a thorough removal of IL residues after cellulose regeneration is highly recommended, and a systematic investigation on this subject is much needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.08.009

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several empirical and semi-empirical polarity scales have been used to explain and predict solubility of biomolecules and biopolymers in solvents, for example Hansen solubility parameters, COSMO-RS and Kamlet-Taft polarity parameters.

    “Several empirical and semi-empirical polarity scales have been used to explain and predict solubility of biomolecules and biopolymers in solvents, for example the Hansen solubility parameters, 21,85 COSMO-RS 86 and the Kamlet-Taft polarity parameters.87”

    From Deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass with ionic liquids (2013) · cites this paper as [87]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, H., Jones, C. L., Baker, G. A., Xia, S., Olubajo, O., & Person, V. N.
Affiliations
  • Savannah State University (US)
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
  • Tianjin University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhao, Hua
Venue
Journal of Biotechnology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
139
Issue
1
Pages
47-54
ISSN
0168-1656 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988081630
Cited by
492
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 60
FWCI
25.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund (46776-GB1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Ionic liquids properties and applications
Keywords
regenerated cellulose, ionic liquids, enzymatic hydrolysis, cellulose pretreatment, lignocellulosic biomass, cellulase accessibility, cellulose crystallinity, saccharification, cellulose recalcitrance, Avicel, filter paper, cotton, ethanol production, non-volatile solvents, cellulose dissolution
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Cellulase, Cellulose, Crystallization, Kinetics, Temperature, Trichoderma, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared, Ionic Liquids, Protein Stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review