Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 351

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Blood-Processing Protocols on Fetal and Total DNA Quantification in Maternal Plasma

Chiu, Rossa W K, Poon, Leo L M, Lau, Tze K, Leung, Tse N, Wong, Eric M C, Lo, Y M Dennis·2001·Clinical Chemistry

Abstract

Background: Recently, apoptotic cells have been found in plasma obtained by centrifugation of blood from pregnant women, raising the question of what constitutes plasma and whether plasma is truly cell free. We compared the effects of different blood-processing protocols on the quantification, DNA composition, and day-to-day fluctuation of fetal and total DNA in maternal plasma. Methods: Blood samples were collected from healthy pregnant women. The blood sample from each individual was simultaneously processed by different means, including the following: Percoll separation, centrifugation, microcentrifugation, and filtration. The resulting plasma aliquots were subjected to real-time quantitative amplification of the β-globin (for total DNA) and SRY (for fetal DNA) genes. The differences in the β-globin and SRY DNA concentrations and the degree of variation between the various plasma aliquots were assessed statistically. Results: Different protocols of blood processing significantly affected the quantification and the day-to-day fluctuation of total (P <0.001), but not fetal (quantification, P = 0.336; fluctuation, P = 0.206), DNA in maternal plasma. The quantitative difference could be attributed to the fact that efficacies of different protocols for generating cell-free plasma vary. Processing blood samples by centrifugation followed by filtration or microcentrifugation is effective in producing cell-free plasma. Conclusions: Standardization in plasma-processing protocols is needed for maternal plasma DNA analysis, especially for quantification of total DNA in maternal plasma. Such preanalytic factors may also affect other applications of plasma DNA analysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/clinchem/47.9.1607

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 351

Metadata

Authors
Chiu, R. W. K., Poon, L. L. M., Lau, T. K., Leung, T. N., Wong, E. M. C., & Lo, Y. M. D.
Venue
Clinical Chemistry
Published
2001-09-01
Volume
47
Issue
9
Pages
1607-1613
ISSN
  • 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8561
OpenAlex
W2108546855
Cited by
351
References
25
FWCI
18.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Blood-Processing Protocols on Fetal and Total DNA Quantification in Maternal Plasma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/clinchem/47.9.1607
The paper
Chiu, R. W. K., Poon, L. L. M., Lau, T. K., Leung, T. N., Wong, E. M. C., & Lo, Y. M. D. (2001). Effects of Blood-Processing Protocols on Fetal and Total DNA Quantification in Maternal Plasma. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/47.9.1607

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.