The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reconceptualizing Collective Action in the Contemporary Media Environment
Abstract
Collective action theory, which is widely applied to explain human phenomena in which public goods are at stake, traditionally rests on at least two main tenets: that individuals confront discrete decisions about free riding and that formal organization is central to locating and contacting potential participants in collective action, motivating them, and coordinating their actions. Recent uses of technologies of information and communication for collective action appear in some instances to violate these two tenets. In order to explain these, we reconceptualize collective action as a phenomenon of boundary crossing between private and public domains. We show how a reconceptualized theory of collective action can better account for certain contemporary phenomena, and we situate traditional collective action theory as a special case of our expanded theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Olson, M. (1965) · doi:10.4159/9780674041660 · Cited by 14,191
The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure
Samuelson, P. A. (1954) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/1925895 · Cited by 7,458
Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age
Melucci, A. (1996) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511520891 · Cited by 1,976
Information and American Democracy: Technology in the Evolution of Political Power
Bimber, B. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615573 · Cited by 526
Self-citationConnective and Communal Public Goods in Interactive Communication Systems
Fulk, J., Flanagin, A. J., Kalman, M. E., Monge, P. R., & Ryan, T. (1996) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00120.x · Cited by 260
Self-citation
Cited by
THE LOGIC OF CONNECTIVE ACTION: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.670661 · Cited by 3,116
Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects
Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654311404435 · Cited by 2,361
Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth
(2009) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684520910969998 · Cited by 522
Theocharis, Y., Lowe, W., van Deth, J. W., & García-Albacete, G. (2015) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2014.948035 · Cited by 504
Youmans, W. L., & York, J. C. (2012) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01636.x · Cited by 376
Metadata
- Authors
- Bimber, B.
- Venue
- Communication Theory
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-11-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 365-388
- ISSN
- 1050-3293 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2885
- OpenAlex
- W2149215949
- Cited by
- 597
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 28.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reconceptualizing Collective Action in the Contemporary Media Environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ct/15.4.365
- The paper
- Bimber, B. (2005). Reconceptualizing Collective Action in the Contemporary Media Environment. Communication Theory. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/15.4.365
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.